--- description: CollaborateMDを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: CollaborateMDとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [医療システム](/directory/20029/medical-practice-management/software) > [CollaborateMD](/software/81299/collaboratemd-pms) # CollaborateMD Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/81299/collaboratemd-pms ページ：1 / 6\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/81299/collaboratemd-pms?page=2) > このクラウド・ベースの診療管理と医療請求ソフトウェアには、診療と収益サイクルの管理に役立つ直感的なツールが搭載されています。 > > 評価：113人のユーザーによる評価は**4.1/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### CollaborateMDの対象ユーザー CollaborateMDの直感的なクラウド・ベースの診療管理と医療請求ソフトウェアは、さまざまな専門分野の小規模から中規模の診療とあらゆる規模の医療請求サービス向けに設計されています。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.1/5** | 113 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.1/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 3.8/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.0/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.0/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 70% | (7/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: CollaborateMD - **ロケーション**: Orlando, アメリカ - **設立**: 1999 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $235.00 - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500 - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ） - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アイルランド, アゼルバイジャン, アフガニスタン, アメリカ合衆国, アラブ首長国連邦, アルジェリア, アルゼンチン, アルバ, アルバニア, アルメニア, アンギラ, アンゴラ, アンティグア・バーブーダ, アンドラ, イエメン, イギリス, イスラエル, イタリア, イラク さらに209件 ## 機能 - Confirmations/Reminders - HIPAA準拠 - Third-Party Integrations - アポイントメントのスケジューリング - アポイントメント管理 - カレンダー管理 - コンプライアンス追跡 - コードとチャージのエントリー - ドキュメント管理 - ヘルスケア・コンプライアンス - レポートと統計 - 医師スケジューリング - 医療費請求 - 医院運営 - 患者スケジューリング - 患者ポータル - 患者記録管理 - 苦情フィルタリング - 苦情管理 - 被保険者資格検証 - 請求、インボイス - 請求書履歴 - 送金アドバイス - 電子医療記録・電子カルテ - 電子決済 ## 統合 (合計12件) - Alleva - Amazing Charts - Elation - Hello Health - Kipu - Medical Mime - Practice Fusion - Praxis EMR - PrognoCIS - Ritten - Sevocity - WebPT ## サポートのオプション - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - チャット対応有 ## Category - [医療システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/20029/medical-practice-management/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [医療システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/20029/medical-practice-management/software) - [医療費請求ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30026/medical-billing/software) - [カイロプラクティックソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30115/chiropractic/software) - [薬物乱用EMR](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/32708/substance-abuse-emr/software) ## 代替製品 1. [athenaOne](https://www.capterra.jp/software/98735/athenaone) — 3.8/5 (911 reviews) 2. [NextGen Office](https://www.capterra.jp/software/31268/nextgen-ambulatory-ehr) — 4.0/5 (1284 reviews) 3. [SimplePractice](https://www.capterra.jp/software/130710/simplepractice) — 4.6/5 (2827 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Excellent customization abilities within Scheduling and Reporting functions" — 5.0/5 > **Gianna** | *2018年3月7日* | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The programming is intuitive and each section of a patient's account, such as patient data and claim data, communicates together (which improves ease of use and decreases labor costs). > > **改善点**: It needs to have bidirectional communication with our EHR, Practice Fusion. Claims are sent from PF to CMD, but patient data is not communicated from CMD to PF, which costs us labor to input the schedule and patient data twice, once in each program. > > It makes it easy for staff to understand billing procedures and therefore they can better explain to patients when balances accrue due to coinsurance/copays/deductibles. ----- ### "Pluses and minuses for sure" — 4.0/5 > **Keli** | *2025年5月27日* | 病院、ヘルスケア | おすすめ評価：6.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: It is user friendly and easy to navigate. I honestly was able to learn more on my own than with assistance. > > **改善点**: The implementation is sloppy and drags out. It should not take over a month to get this started. Extremely disappointing. > > Overall it is a fairly good experience. I was very transparent when we signed up for Collab that this implementation period cannot drag out for a month or two and the Collab rep stated she understood that. Here we are a month later. This is honestly ridiculous to drag it out. ----- ### "Training is taking too long and inadequate" — 1.0/5 > **Annette** | *2025年5月28日* | 医療業務 | おすすめ評価：0.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Ability to enter claims quickly without having to go from platform to platform. Other than that I find it confusing to use. > > **改善点**: I cannot get anyone to answer my emails. I get trained for one hour per week and then I have to struggle alone until the next training. My business is in limbo. I really do not think my trainer has ever entered a claim so they really can't see what I see and do not understand what I am talking about. There was a problem with an ERA last week and I cannot settle the claim because he didn't know how to deal with it. He never followed up with me to let me know how to proceed. > > Supposedly I can reach out to my trainer and my representative. I have called my representative and emailed him several times for help. When I go to the chat or help desk they won't talk to me without going to my trainer who I have also emailed. ----- ### "Very good and simple" — 5.0/5 > **Sherlynn** | *2025年5月29日* | 医療業務 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I like the simplicity of CMD and that if I ever have questions, there is a knowledge center available. If I have more complex questions, I can always reach out to the support chat. I really enjoy the chat feature. > > **改善点**: We operate on Hawaii Standard Time and the support chat is only available until 6PM Eastern Standard Time, there is only a limited window for us to be able to chat. If there were 24/7 support that would be great. > > Overall it has been a very good experience and it is way better than the old system our office used to use. It makes my job way easier than before. ----- ### "Collaborate MD" — 4.0/5 > **SLOAN** | *2021年5月12日* | メンタルヘルスケア | おすすめ評価：5.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The scheduling platform that Collaborate offered was very user friendly and offered a lot of features that helped our practice even when we were bringing on new hires. I liked most that in scheduling/calendar area you could at a very quick glance differentiate between scheduled, checking in, rescheduled, cancelled, and no show appointments. The "appointment box" if you will call it, also provided a glance of "appointment notes" from staff such as "collect $$$ copay" or "get new ins card" etc. That feature was very helpful across our practice since our verification and billing was a separate department than our scheduling and reception. Billing was no complicated and user friendly. Initially when I started using this program I was new to everything and had never even done billing before but due to its simplicity and ease of use it was not complicated for me, a new biller, new to the software, to pick up and start billing with ease. > > **改善点**: There were some gaps that could use some improvements. It lacked a comprehensive referral system, It lacked management access to fine tune the automations of the application such as patient reminders, patient broadcasting, same day appointment broadcasting ex. "the provider had an emergency, pls contact office to reschedule appt" or something of the sorts. Also, pt messaging features were lacking. I could not text a pt, email a pt, or anything like that from within the system. > > Overall, it was pleasant. User friendly. Very easy on the eyes and very easy to train staff on in regards to the front office aspect of the software. ----- ページ：1 / 6\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/81299/collaboratemd-pms?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/81299/collaboratemd-pms) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## 構造化データ