--- description: Jama Connectを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Jama Connectとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [要件管理ツール](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [Jama Connect](/software/80432/jama) # Jama Connect Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/80432/jama ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/80432/jama?page=2) > 要件、リスク、テスト管理を実現する優れたソリューション > > 評価：15人のユーザーによる評価は**4.3/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Jama Connectの対象ユーザー 一貫したトレーサビリティ、共同のレビューとテスト管理に基づいて、製品およびプロジェクト要件を一元的に管理したいと考えているシステムエンジニア、テストエンジニア、製品マネージャー、ビジネスアナリスト。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.3/5** | 15 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.0/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.1/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 3.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 80% | (8/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Jama Software - **ロケーション**: Portland, アメリカ - **設立**: 2006 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格モデル**: (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ）, Windows（オンプレミス）, Linux（オンプレミス） - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイルランド, アメリカ合衆国, イギリス, オランダ, カナダ, スイス, スウェーデン, デンマーク, ドイツ, フランス ## 機能 - アクセス制御・許可 - タスク進捗追跡 - ワークフロー管理 - 優先順位付け - 変更管理 ## 統合 (合計9件) - AWARD - Ansys medini analyze - Azure DevOps Server - Enterprise Architect - GitHub - Jira - Modern Requirements4DevOps - TestRail - Tricentis qTest ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [要件管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.jp/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3665 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.jp/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15324 reviews) 3. [Aha\!](https://www.capterra.jp/software/144020/aha) — 4.7/5 (561 reviews) 4. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.jp/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2888 reviews) 5. [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.jp/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4567 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Jama Connect Review" — 5.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2019年4月30日* | 小売 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Jama provides a very user-friendly interface with a lot of intuitive functionality. Provides requirement traceability and also versioning. The functionality to apply filters has been implemented better than most of its competitors in the market. > > **改善点**: The text editor can be a little difficult for a first time user and can be made more intuitive. Filtering can be made more convenient to use. > > Overall experience using Jama Connect has been really good. I would definitely recommend it to my colleagues. ----- ### "Good choice for requirement management" — 4.0/5 > **Manoj** | *2017年10月12日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：7.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: 1. I have been using Jama for over one and half years. The good thing about JAMA is all the requirements are systematically placed in JAMA. Its search option is good. By typing any keyword, all the related requirements get listed below. 2. I liked the requirement review facility in Jama. All the comments are well preserved. By going through them, I can ensure whether any comments are still open. It helps in tracking the closure of all questions/comments raised during requirement review. 3. Notification service of JAMA is quite good > > **改善点**: 1. I felt that loading and navigation of Jama needs to be improved. Sometimes the delay is quite noticeable. 2. Though the homepage contains all important information, little improvement in look and feel of GUI can make it more attractive. 3. There should be auto login in Jama using windows login password like other software I use. Every time I have to manually give windows login/password to enter Jama > > Good product but loading and navigation issues ----- ### "Jama Connect short comings" — 2.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2026年3月20日* | 航空宇宙産業 | おすすめ評価：0.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: + It uses a tree and list format for accessing requirements and baselines. + It has an API to extend to other tools. > > **改善点**: - Coming on to a large program with Digital Thread needs, I was not impressed by the lack of connectivity to other tools. - When deleting a requirement, it deletes it from previous baselines. - The object limit is not large enough for very large projects. - When reviewing requirements in a Jama review, the screen scrolls back up to the first requirement in the pane after checking the requirement reviewed button. - Trace views don't show all of the requirement text, which requires users to export the data to analyze the requirement trace. - Documentation is management glossy level and lacking details. - The application becomes slow, when the project is very large. > > Not intuitive. It encourages the user to export requirements to spreadsheets for analysis, since formatting trace views is limited to columns and requirements with long text get cut-off. There is no what to view more than two levels simultaneously. I have found that it is easier to export to csv files, and then to run a python script that I wrote to reformat and write a file that can easily be formatted and viewed in Excel. From my current experience with the tool over the last 5 months, I don't trust it to manage requirements and traceability over baselines. ----- ### "I use Jama daility and love it" — 5.0/5 > **Leyna** | *2021年4月7日* | 自動車 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Tracks my requirements, helps collaborate with other engineers on requirements, the Jama Reviews and change process is easy to implement and use. They also added e-signatures for approvers which has been key in baselining requirements. > > **改善点**: Its hard to separate admin access from create access, though recently Jama implemented changes to admin usage and its helped. The baselining feature is not strong either, rather, items are baselined per review regardless of approvals and rejections. > > I am an admin and active user and I love this product\! I cant do my job without it\! ----- ### "A scalable multi-staged product" — 5.0/5 > **Rakesh** | *2022年11月18日* | 鉱業、金属 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Requirements and change management with up and down stream relationships with requirements, use cases, design, tests > > **改善点**: Very expensive for organization to continue. Document export required lot of adjustments to be presentable. > > Good experience if supported by the company. ----- ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/80432/jama?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/80432/jama) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | sv | | ----- ## 構造化データ