--- description: Cradleを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Cradleとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [要件管理ツール](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [Cradle](/software/78756/cradle) # Cradle Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/78756/cradle ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/78756/cradle?page=2) > システムおよびプロセス・エンジニアリング・プロジェクトのための優れた要件管理ソリューション。 > > 評価：27人のユーザーによる評価は**4.4/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Cradleの対象ユーザー 高い機能性を備えたシステムを開発する企業。 代表的な市場は、航空宇宙、自動車、防衛、金融、政府、製造、原子力、プロセス制御、通信、輸送です。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.4/5** | 27 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 3.8/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.8/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: 3SL - **ロケーション**: Barrow-in-Furness, 英国 - **設立**: 1987 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $449.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Windows（デスクトップ）, Linux（デスクトップ） - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アイルランド, アメリカ合衆国, アルバニア, アンティグア・バーブーダ, アンドラ, イギリス, イスラエル, イタリア, ウクライナ, エストニア, オランダ, オーストラリア, オーストリア, オーランド諸島, カナダ, ガーンジー, キプロス, ギリシャ, クロアチア さらに59件 ## 機能 - アクセス制御・許可 - 優先順位付け - 変更管理 ## 統合 (合計1件) - Microsoft Word ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - 電話サポート - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [要件管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.jp/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3663 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.jp/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15314 reviews) 3. [Aha\!](https://www.capterra.jp/software/144020/aha) — 4.7/5 (561 reviews) 4. [ReqView](https://www.capterra.jp/software/145388/reqview) — 4.6/5 (49 reviews) 5. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.jp/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2887 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Customers In Mind" — 5.0/5 > **Sarah** | *2018年8月30日* | 航空宇宙産業 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The developers kept the customer in mind when creating the tool. The user interface is very accommodating and easy to use. Capability to collaborate with other tools very helpful and a top requirement when choosing the right tool. The customer service is excellent\! Always available and willing to work with the customer to the needs. > > **改善点**: I have not run into any cons. I’m impressed with the tool. > > I’m extremely impressed with the tool. I even enjoy having the capability to work in a sandbox area for practice. Training to excellent\! ----- ### "Requirements Engineering Software - could not manage without it" — 4.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2018年8月30日* | 病院、ヘルスケア | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Designed to manage engineering and operational requirements first. Will handle software requirements as well, but I like the fact that it uses terms recognised by civil, mechanical, electrical, marine, aerospace, automotive, nuclear engineers. Second important plus point is its graphical capability. To be able to show how a requirement links to a process or an organisation brings the whole subject of RE to life making it so much simpler to ensure users can record all their requirements and that they can verify that they have been met. > > **改善点**: The user interface is very traditional and is ready for a facelift. It works well for requirements engineers but is not as intuitive as would be needed for infrequent access and use by business users. > > From the initial engagement with the staff at 3SL through implementation and support we have been well supported. The few gaps we found for our particular use of have been filled as an enhancement, initially for us, but then will become part of the core product. A very responsive organisation. The flexibility of its metamodel (Schema) has allowed us to extend our use well beyond traditional Requirements Engineering. Where will Cradle take us next? ----- ### "Cradle Life" — 3.0/5 > **Thomas** | *2018年8月29日* | エンタテインメント | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Modeling, Requirement Management, Click and Drag objects. Can support almost any SE task. Full SE life-cycle support capabilities. > > **改善点**: Performance, Web Access, Older looking, Proprietary Database, Difficult to integrate with other systems. Sometimes that amount of functionality makes it hard to remember how to use the system unless you are in it every day. > > I have been working with Cradle for the past 12 years and have not found a SE tool with Cradles functionality. Other tools do not allow you to follow the complete System Engineering Process from Modeling all the way to retirement. ----- ### "Usage and Administration of CRADLE" — 5.0/5 > **Frank** | *2018年8月30日* | 電気・電子機器製造 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: It covers almost every task you may encounter during requirements management process. If you get used to the interface it is very flexible and can easily be adopted to specific needs. The text format of the Cradle export files allows a lot of additional (specific) data processing. > > **改善点**: Actually I'm missing privileges to restrict link management (especially deleting a link). For people typically working with Microsoft Office application, the usage of CRADLE requires a change in mindset (but this may also be a 'Pros'). The upgrade process is really challenging for our IT. The direct connection of server and client version leads to a 1-day shutdown of CRADLE and parallel distributing of the clients to a lot of computers. The Document Publisher is really hard to use. Template definition requires a lot of effert and experiments until it is running. The publishing process is too time consuming. > > I think its a perfect tool to implement a process for requirements engineering at least to the level we are using it. (We don't do any modelling os far, also no systems engineering.) ----- ### "A very valuable and customizable RM Tool" — 5.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2018年8月30日* | 石油、エネルギー | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: CRADLE is a very mature solution, pefectly suitable for large scale requirements engineering projects. It can perfectly be adapted to any business model, process, allowing very specific customization (using an API for interface developments interacting with the tools database). Data access control can be tailored to match a projects organization, data configuration management is very precisely ensured. A wide range of file formats is proposed for interfaces with the external world (for imports, exports, or as attachments) 3SL Team offers a very good support and service when required. > > **改善点**: The interface of the client could be considered as a bit stark and old fashioned. (we did not worked with web interfaces) Unfortunately, only one baseline can be open at a time, validated alternatives could only be managed using distinct objects. User experience for Verification \& Validation process (using workflows) could be enhanced (reviews by validator is to be preferably done using XLS exports) Source document import using Doc Loader (Word format) can be a difficult experience for docs with complex structure, and could allow more possibilities (table patterns) ----- ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/78756/cradle?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/78756/cradle) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## 構造化データ