--- description: Wrikeを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Wrikeとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [プロジェクト管理ツール](/directory/30002/project-management/software) > [Wrike](/software/76113/wrike) # Wrike Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/76113/wrike ページ：1 / 123\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/76113/wrike?page=2) > Wrikeは、テンプレート、タイムトラッキング、ガントチャート、カンバン、レポートなどを備えた企業向けプロジェクト管理ソフトです。 > > 評価：3038人のユーザーによる評価は**4.4/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Wrikeの対象ユーザー チームワークを採用し、複数のプロジェクトやクライアントを扱う中規模および大規模の企業に最適です。カスタム・ワークフロー、フィールド、レポートを使用して、ニーズに合わせてWrikeをカスタマイズできます。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.4/5** | 3038 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 80% | (8/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Wrike - **ロケーション**: San Jose, アメリカ - **設立**: 2007 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $10.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ）, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: イタリア語, インドネシア語, ウクライナ語, オランダ語, スウェーデン語, スペイン語, デンマーク語, ドイツ語, ノルウェー語, フランス語, ポルトガル語, ポーランド語, ロシア語, 中国語, 日本語, 繁体中国語, 英語, 韓国語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アイルランド, アゼルバイジャン, アメリカ合衆国, アラブ首長国連邦, アルジェリア, アルゼンチン, アルバ, アルバニア, アルメニア, アンギラ, アンゴラ, アンティグア・バーブーダ, アンドラ, イエメン, イギリス, イスラエル, イタリア, インド, インドネシア さらに202件 ## 機能 - Asset Lifecycle Management - Goal Setting/Tracking - ITレポート - ROI Tracking - Workflow Automation - アクティビティ計画 - インタラクション追跡 - カレンダー管理 - カレンダー／リマインダー・システム - キャパシティ・プランニング - キャパシティ管理 - キャンペーン管理 - キャンペーン計画 - コミュニケーション管理 - コンテンツ公開オプション - スケジューリング - スプリント計画 - セキュア・データストレージ - チャット、メッセージング - チャンネル管理 - ドキュメント・キャプチャ - ドキュメント・レビュー - ドキュメント管理 - パフォーマンス・レビュー管理 - フォーム作成・デザイン - フルテキスト検索 - ブランド・ガイドライン - プロジェクト・スケジューリング - プロジェクト追跡 - プロセスのモデリング・設計 - マルチキャンペーン - マルチチャネル・キャンペーン - マーケティングの自動化 - マーケティング・カレンダー - リソース・スケジューリング - レポート／分析 - ログ収集 - ワークフロー構成 - 可用性管理 - 従業員ディレクトリ - 戦略的計画 - 支出分析 - 目標管理 - 経費精算 - 統合型ビジネス運営 - 製品ロードマッピング - 財務分析 - 財務報告 - 連絡先データベース - 顧客管理 ... さらに209件の機能 ## 統合 (合計138件) - AWS Lambda - Adobe Campaign - Adobe Creative Cloud - Airbrake - Airtable - Amazon Cognito - Amazon Lex - Amazon S3 - Anaplan - Apache Kafka - Asana - Ascent ERP - BambooHR - Basecamp - BigCommerce ... さらに123件の統合 ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [プロジェクト管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30002/project-management/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [プロジェクト管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [グループウェア](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [PSAシステム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/16/professional-services-automation/software) - [タスク管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [BPMツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30010/business-process-management/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Clockify](https://www.capterra.jp/software/169607/clockify) — 4.8/5 (9259 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.jp/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15460 reviews) 3. [Asana](https://www.capterra.jp/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13652 reviews) 4. [monday.com AI Work Platform](https://www.capterra.jp/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6097 reviews) 5. [Trello](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23595 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Very user-friendly" — 5.0/5 > **Federico** | *2024年11月21日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Wrike is very easy to use and it helps me manage my projects effectively. I can create custom workflows and track my progress. It also integrates with other tools that I use. > > **改善点**: Nothing really bad\! Wrike is a great tool for software development. ----- ### "Great for Managing Product Initiatives" — 5.0/5 > **suman** | *2026年7月3日* | 教育管理 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Wrike provides fantastic workflow customization, clear dashboard visibility, and strong reporting capabilities-enabling us to see where features are developing, and what's most important. Their collaborative features are fantastic for directly linking conversations and activity back to the right tasks. Wrike's other productivity tool integrations keep our product development moving. > > **改善点**: Initial setup for this platform is a time-consuming process, and users need adequate training to maximize its functionality. The interface can get cluttered, and several customization options, and advanced reporting features are only available on premium plans. > > The experience overall for myself on Wrike has been really great. I use it for task coordination with product engineering feature developemnet, organize the product road map and with many other people. All of the tasks and timelines and updates with the product development on one platform simplifies me managing the whole process. ----- ### "An Excellent Platform for Managing Campaigns and Cross-Functional Projects" — 5.0/5 > **Ojas** | *2026年7月30日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Wrike's intuitive project management capabilities and customizable dashboards made it easy to track tasks, manage campaigns, and collaborate across teams. The real-time visibility into project status, timelines, and dependencies helped improve efficiency and kept stakeholders aligned. I also appreciated the reporting features, which made performance tracking and resource planning much easier.Its task tracking, collaboration tools, and customizable workflows helped my team stay on schedule and communicate effectively. The platform provided excellent visibility into ongoing work and reduced the need for constant follow-ups.I found the customizable workflows, dashboards, and reporting tools particularly useful for managing complex campaigns and tracking progress in real time. It helped improve accountability, streamline communication, and ensure deadlines were met efficiently. The user-friendly interface also made adoption easy for different teams.Wrike significantly improved team collaboration, project visibility, and campaign execution efficiency, making it an essential tool for managing complex workflow. > > **改善点**: There isn't much to dislike, but the platform can feel overwhelming initially due to the number of features available. A simpler onboarding experience and more intuitive navigation for new users would make adoption easier. The platform has a learning curve, especially for new users. Some advanced features and customization options can feel overwhelming at first, and it can take time for teams to fully adopt and optimize the tool > > My overall experience with Wrike has been very positive. It is a robust and reliable project management platform that helps teams stay organized, collaborate effectively, and maintain visibility across projects. The ability to customize workflows, dashboards, and reports made it easy to adapt the tool to our team's specific needs. Wrike streamlined task management, improved communication among stakeholders, and provided real-time insights into project progress, helping us meet deadlines more consistently. While there is a learning curve for some of the advanced features, the benefits in terms of productivity, accountability, and project transparency far outweigh the initial setup effort. Overall, Wrike has been a valuable tool for managing complex projects and enhancing team efficiency. ----- ### "Wrike Review" — 3.0/5 > **Hannah** | *2026年6月8日* | 病院、ヘルスケア | おすすめ評価：4.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I like that we are able to hold team members accountable, the reporting helps make it easy to see the types of projects worked on, and that we can have other teams within the Wrike platform but they dont have access to our marketing spaces. > > **改善点**: They make a lot of changes with 0 to little notice. And when the changes are made the training isnt great and when we worked with our Rep she gives us incorrect information (on more than one occasion). This is why when anyone on our team has Wrike issues we submit a ticket vs reaching out to the people on our account. > > Its been fine. We enjoy the platform but have been very upset with things being discontinued, items being changed, and our representatives. We will probably reevalute the platform at the end of our contract to see if there is another one we can use. ----- ### "Our team runs on Wrike now and we have almost no issues with it" — 5.0/5 > **Anastasia** | *2026年5月26日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The cross-tagging is literally the first real game-changer for how our team works and so instead of having to create and maintain two separate versions of the same task/project, when something impacts both marketing and ops teams, you don’t have to duplicate anything or follow-up on multiple teams. I am beat from today and needed to write this down before i forgot about what i was saying. The Gantt view in Wrike is probably one of the better views i’ve used. The ability to drag dependencies around and have everything flow without breaking (this seems like a no-brainer), has been a pain point for many other platforms. Blueprints will likely also reduce your overall setup time if you’re creating similar types of projects, as once you get your blueprint set up correctly; you won’t be building from scratch every single time. > > **改善点**: I find that the dashboard builder is somewhat underwhelming relative to the power of the rest of the application. While you’ll be able to get very basic widgets into the dashboard, most of the more detailed reporting capabilities require far too much clicking and sometimes the data just doesn’t report out in the manner that you’d expect. Request forms work fine, however new users often need to be walked through where their submissions end up post-submission, as it’s not clear. It may seem minor, but the notification section becomes cluttered quickly and i haven’t found a good way to clean it out without getting into settings and adjusting the noise levels. In terms of cost structure – there isn’t a lot of flexibility with the pricing tiers. Some of the really valuable features such as time-tracking reports and automated trigger functionality are restricted by higher tier plans. > > Prior to using Wrike, we were updating project status via email chains, keeping track of tasks via spreadsheets and checking-in on project status via Slack messages — none of which were connected. Thus, each question received approximately 4 different answers in 4 different places. Now all of these questions have a central location to receive an answer and because they’re tied together (contextually) including comments, files, and historical status updates – they get completed much faster and more accurately than when they existed in someone’s email box. ----- ページ：1 / 123\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/76113/wrike?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/76113/wrike) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## 構造化データ