--- description: Basecampを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Basecampとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [グループウェア](/directory/15/collaboration/software) > [Basecamp](/software/56808/basecamp) # Basecamp Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/56808/basecamp ページ：1 / 578\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/56808/basecamp?page=2) > 何百万人もの人々に信頼されているBasecampは、業務の遂行に必要なあらゆることを1か所にまとめています。 > > 評価：14411人のユーザーによる評価は**4.3/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Basecampの対象ユーザー 起業家、フリーランサー、小企業、大規模組織内のグループ。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.3/5** | 14411 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 80% | (8/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Basecamp - **ロケーション**: Chicago, アメリカ - **設立**: 1999 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $15.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ）, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アイルランド, アゼルバイジャン, アフガニスタン, アメリカ合衆国, アラブ首長国連邦, アルジェリア, アルゼンチン, アルバ, アルバニア, アルメニア, アンギラ, アンゴラ, アンティグア・バーブーダ, アンドラ, イエメン, イギリス, イスラエル, イタリア, イラク さらに207件 ## 機能 - @メンション - Discussions/Forums - Sub-Task Management - Task Editing - Third-Party Integrations - アイデア管理 - アクセス制御・許可 - アクティビティ・ダッシュボード - アクティビティ・ニュースフィード - アラート／通知 - アンケートおよびフィードバック - カレンダー管理 - コミュニケーション管理 - コメント、メモ - コラボレーションツール - タスク管理 - タスク進捗追跡 - チャット、メッセージング - テンプレートのカスタマイズ - ドキュメント管理 - ドラッグ・アンド・ドロップ - ファイル共有 - プロジェクト計画／スケジューリング - プロジェクト追跡 - マイルストーン追跡 - メッセージング - モバイル・アクセス - ライブチャット - リアルタイム・チャット - レポートと統計 - ワークフロー構成 - ワークフロー管理 - 優先順位付け - 割り当て管理 - 報告、プロジェクト追跡 - 役割ベース許可 - 時間追跡 - 検索／フィルター - 納期管理 - 製品ロードマッピング - 進捗の追跡 ## 統合 (合計93件) - AgencyDots - Akita - Apideck - Asana - AssessTEAM - Bridge24 - BrightGauge - Calamari - Centreli - Claritee - ClicData - ClickUp - Clockify - CoSchedule Marketing Suite - Cyfe ... さらに78件の統合 ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [グループウェア](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/15/collaboration/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [グループウェア](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [プロジェクト管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [タスク管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [チーム コミュニケーション ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31033/team-communication/software) - [非営利プロジェクト管理ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) ## 代替製品 1. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.jp/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6024 reviews) 2. [Clockify](https://www.capterra.jp/software/169607/clockify) — 4.8/5 (9241 reviews) 3. [Jira](https://www.capterra.jp/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15358 reviews) 4. [Asana](https://www.capterra.jp/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13565 reviews) 5. [Trello](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23523 reviews) ## レビュー ### "A Clear and Simple Way to Manage Work" — 4.0/5 > **Abby** | *2025年9月24日* | マーケティング、広告 | おすすめ評価：7.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Here are the top reasons Basecamp works well for our team: • Somewhat intuitive and easy to onboard new team members. • Centralizes communication: message boards, chat, automatic check-ins that we can house with designated project spaces. • Encourages organized structure – for each project, you can keep tasks, files, discussions all in context, reducing emails or other project management tools. > > **改善点**: Some challenges we've had: • There are some missing advanced project management features like task dependencies, subtasks and more robust reporting. • Limited flexibility/customization: our workflow is complex (multiple phases, branching, conditional flows), Basecamp has felt restrictive at times. • Notifications are sometimes overwhelming with the amount of to-dos we input. Sometimes we miss or lose track of important alerts. • We have found issues with inconsistency between desktop app notifications and the web version. The desktop app works better for me. • No built-in time tracking, which would be nice given we have to submit timesheets. > > We've used Basecamp for over a year across our 10-person marketing team. Overall, it’s been valuable for keeping communication, project tasks, and file management in one place. It's especially helpful given most of our team is remote. However, there are trade-offs. There are things that work well and what could be improved, from my perspective. If your team values simplicity, clarity and housing discussions/tasks/files in one unified workspace, Basecamp is a strong tool. For organizations pursuing highly detailed project planning, deep customization or advanced analytics, you may find there are limitations. ----- ### "It is ok for managing everything mostly" — 4.0/5 > **Keir** | *2026年1月24日* | コンピュータ・ソフトウェア | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: My coffee has gone cold and this desk is to small for 2 monitors but Basecamp manages the sprint without blowing up. I was pleasantly surprised the AI formatted my notes correctly, unlike other programs that create chaos with them. We do all our frontend and QA ticketing thru Basecamp, it is nice that they do not vanish into thin air. They also provide us with an additional view of the board and calendar, which is whatever. > > **改善点**: The most frustrating thing about Basecamp is sometimes it seems like they put to much emphasis on features and I lose track of where things are located, especially finding the CRM section. The largest pain point is I am unable to enable my camera when I am creating a video clip for the team, which makes zero sense. > > The first thing I used was Trello, but it broke pretty soon at more than a couple of employees and I had to buy Basecamp. This system provides the client with an opportunity to see their own, proof and marketing schedule, taking out a lot of phone calls. Less usage of Slack as well, since comments are related directly to each task. ----- ### "Not the most user-friendly app" — 3.0/5 > **Caitie** | *2026年3月27日* | 健康、ウェルネス、フィットネス | おすすめ評価：6.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I didn't find basecamp to be very user friendly, the interface is a bit scattered and confusing, and I didn't like the way it was organized. > > **改善点**: The interface, the difficulty of finding where things were, and the constant confusion when trying to navigate within the app. > > I wasn't impressed with basecamp overall. As mentioned I had a tough time finding where things were and staying organized in the app. ----- ### "Excellent PM tool" — 5.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2026年1月12日* | グラフィックデザイン | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: It keeps my freelance work organized and clutter-free. Everything lives in one place and the design is super intuitive. > > **改善点**: There really isn’t much to dislike as a solo freelancer. Advanced task features like dependencies would be nice to have. > > Basecamp is a fantastic project management hub for me as a freelancer. It keeps work moving and helps me stay on top of my work/schedule. ----- ### "Basecamp: Clarity and Communication Over Complexity" — 5.0/5 > **Radha** | *2026年4月23日* | 法律サービス | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: What I liked most about Basecamp was its simplicity and clarity. It’s designed to help teams stay organized without feeling overwhelmed. In particular: Clean, user‑friendly interface – Basecamp is easy to navigate, even for new users. Everything is laid out clearly, which reduces confusion and onboarding time. Focused approach to project management – Instead of endless features, Basecamp sticks to core tools like to‑do lists, message boards, schedules, and file sharing. This keeps teams focused on actual work. Strong communication structure – Centralized message boards and comment threads cut down on scattered emails and make it easier to follow conversations over time. Transparency and accountability – Everyone can see what’s happening, who’s responsible for what, and what’s coming next, which supports collaboration and ownership. Minimal setup and maintenance – Projects can be created and managed quickly without complex configuration or customization. Overall, the biggest strength of Basecamp is how it reduces noise and complexity, making it especially effective for teams that value clear communication and straightforward project tracking over heavy customization or advanced workflows. > > **改善点**: What I liked least about Basecamp was that its simplicity can also feel limiting, especially for more complex or fast‑moving teams. In particular: Limited advanced features – Basecamp intentionally avoids things like custom workflows, detailed task dependencies, or advanced reporting, which can make it feel restrictive for larger or more structured projects. Not ideal for complex project tracking – There’s no native support for things like Gantt charts, workload planning, or time tracking, which some teams rely on for visibility and deadlines. Flat structure can feel rigid – Since all projects follow the same basic setup, it’s harder to adapt Basecamp to different project types or processes. Fewer automation options – Compared to other project management tools, automation and integrations are relatively minimal, which can mean more manual follow‑up. Scaling challenges – As the number of projects and conversations grows, it can become harder to manage or surface priorities quickly. Overall, what I liked least wasn’t a flaw so much as a trade‑off: Basecamp prioritizes simplicity over flexibility. That works well for straightforward collaboration but can feel limiting for teams that need more structure, customization, or advanced tracking tools. > > My overall experience with Basecamp was positive and refreshing, especially for teams that value clarity, communication, and simplicity over complex project management frameworks. Basecamp excelled at keeping work organized and easy to follow. Its clean interface and straightforward structure made it easy for everyone on the team to understand where discussions were happening, what tasks were assigned, and what deadlines were coming up—without needing formal training or ongoing system management. Communication felt more intentional and less fragmented thanks to centralized message boards and discussion threads, which significantly reduced email back‑and‑forth. The platform encouraged a calmer, more focused way of working. By limiting features to the essentials, Basecamp helped prevent over‑planning and micromanagement. For smaller teams or projects with well‑defined goals, this approach supported collaboration and accountability without adding unnecessary overhead. However, the experience became less ideal as project complexity increased. The lack of advanced task dependencies, customization, reporting, or automation meant that more structured teams or deadline‑driven projects sometimes needed workarounds or supplementary tools. In those cases, Basecamp felt more suited to coordination and communication than detailed project tracking. Overall, I found Basecamp to be a strong collaboration tool that works best for teams seeking simplicity, transparency, and reduced noise. While it’s not built for highly complex project management, it delivers a smooth, user‑friendly experience that supports effective teamwork and clear communication. ----- ページ：1 / 578\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/56808/basecamp?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/56808/basecamp) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## 構造化データ