キャプテラ - 日本企業の最適な
ソフトウェア選びをサポートし17年

QuickBooks Enterpriseとは?

QuickBooks Desktop Enterprise (最大55%割引) は、中小規模の製品をベースとしたビジネスのために作られた、非常に強力な会計およびビジネス管理ソリューションです。在庫管理、カスタマイズ可能なレポート作成、受注処理、個別原価計算、高度な価格管理、リアルタイムのファイナンシャルダッシュボード、従業員や支払いを管理するための高度なツールといった機能があります。最大40名までのユーザーに対応可能で、有意義な追加機能を提供する200以上のサードパーティと統合することができます。

QuickBooks Enterpriseの対象ユーザー

請負業者、製造および卸売業者、非営利団体、小売業者などに特化したエディションです。

QuickBooks Enterpriseソフトウェア - 1
QuickBooks Enterpriseソフトウェア - 2

QuickBooks Enterpriseをご存知でしょうか? 別の人気製品との比較

QuickBooks Enterprise

QuickBooks Enterprise

4.5 (20,431)
$1,922.00
無料バージョン
無料トライアル
213
7
4.3 (20,431)
4.3 (20,431)
4.1 (20,431)
VS.
価格プラン
価格オプション
機能
連携サービス
使いやすさ
価格の妥当性
カスタマーサービス
¥66,249
無料バージョン
無料トライアル
350
13
3.9 (1,593)
3.8 (1,593)
3.7 (1,593)
緑色の評価バーは、平均評価とレビュー数に基づいて高評価の製品を表しています。

QuickBooks Enterpriseの他のおすすめ代替製品

NetSuite
高評価の機能
アクティビティ・ダッシュボード
二重払いアラート
利益/損失ステートメント
Zoho Books
高評価の機能
収入、バランスシート
請求、インボイス
請求書作成
Zoho Desk
高評価の機能
CRM
タスク管理
チケット管理
Dynamics 365
高評価の機能
レポート/分析
請求書作成
連絡先データベース
Sage 100
高評価の機能
総勘定元帳
請求、インボイス
財務報告
SAP Concur
高評価の機能
払い戻し管理
経費精算
経費請求
ADP Workforce Now
高評価の機能
口座振込
給与明細
給与管理
QuickBooks Desktop
高評価の機能
経費精算
総勘定元帳
請求、インボイス
Square Point of Sale
高評価の機能
オンライン決済
データセキュリティ
決済処理

QuickBooks Enterpriseの評判・レビュー

評価ポイント

総合評価
4.5
使いやすさ
4.3
カスタマーサービス
4.1
機能
4.4
価格の妥当性
4.3

企業規模(従業員数)別レビュー数

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1,000
  • >1,001
Angela Anne
Volunteer
認証済みLinkedInユーザー
宗教団体, 11~50人規模の会社
使用期間: 6~12か月
投稿経路

Well... It is what it is?

3.0 2 年前
動画プレイヤーで日本語字幕を表示できます
Esther
Esther
ケニアのJournalist
認証済みLinkedInユーザー
放送メディア, 2~10人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Most efficient accountable tool.

5.0 2 か月前

製品を使ってみた感想: We are still in it's first stage using it in our company and the experience is good baring in mind that all of us can access it because we are not very many in our organisation.

良いポイント:

QuickBooks enterprise is much affordable and it has a free trial for beginners meaning there's a room to learn and quit if need be. Also it's easy to learn for new users considering the features offered. Finally this tool has a higher user limit meaning more people can access it at once.

改善してほしい点:

Just one thing, handling the projects at times is a bit slow.

Jackie
アメリカのHR Manager and Controller
自動車, 11~50人規模の会社
使用期間: 2年以上
投稿経路

検討した類似製品:

Quickbooks

4.0 3 週間前 新着

製品を使ってみた感想: Overall, Quickbooks works great and is one of the best options out there. However, there are definitely some downsides and things they really need to work on, especially given that it is one of the higher priced options.

良いポイント:

For the most part, it is pretty straightforward. QuickBooks is one of the most widely-used software, and it gives the option for an accountant to collaborate with you, making end-of-year, quarterly, etc. tax preparation more simple. It does take a little bit of research and practice to get used to, but it isn't much of a challenge. One could reasonably and comprehensively run a small business just using Quickbooks, which makes it a pretty valuable software.

改善してほしい点:

It can be glitchy, and especially so if you don't want to use the automations. For instance, if you don't use the AI tax and payroll payments, it is constantly telling you that you haven't accomplished these 'tasks,' and when they are marked complete, it informs you that there is no task. If you pay overtime, you can't use the automated payroll or taxes, so there isn't much of a way to get around this, and it's frustrating. They try to push you towards these automations, but issues like these prevent it and don't allow you to double-check to make sure all of the numbers are in correctly. Additionally, Quickbooks tries to push you towards AI-assisted answers and chatbots, even when they cannot offer you solutions. Sometimes Quickbooks reps can be helpful and sometimes not at all.

Bill
Bill
アメリカのPresident
認証済みLinkedInユーザー
機械工業, 2~10人規模の会社
使用期間: 2年以上
投稿経路

Quickbooks and lost functionality

1.0 2 週間前 新着

製品を使ってみた感想: Decreased functionality in the software has lead to hours each month additional accounting time. I'm a small business. I'm who Their target should. Making my job easier, not harder should be their goal. They seem to have lost sight of that. Bringing in Melio and disrupting my interface with my bank is a prime example of of this. It adds a layer of complication to the bill paying process that is time consuming and unnecessary in order for Me, the customer, to be able to quickly and easily pay my bills. I'm sure quickbooks gets a kick back of some sort from Melio but that doesn't get passed on to me because Quickbooks has raised their rate again. I would never recommend Quickbooks to anyone starting a new business. There are alternatives out there. For me to change would be a monumental undertaking so I'm left dealing with the annoyances and confusion with little to no customer support.

良いポイント:

I use the Manufacturing edition. The inventory management features are fairly easy to use and understand. Reporting is straight forward with summary and detailed financials.

改善してほしい点:

Loss of functionality. First thing they took away was the loan manager. Next was interfacing with with my bank directly for bill pay. Instead they added a third party Melio to administer the bill pay through either paper checks or ACH transfers. ACH transfers work relatively well except for the occasional cancelled payment without explanation. Checks can only be written for one invoice and each check costs $1.50. So, for example, if I have a vendor with net 10th terms and 5 invoices from that vendor over a month's time, then Melio can only write 5 checks all to be delivered on the 10th at a cost of $1.50 per check. They also take my money 10 days before the payment is made effectively floating my cash for 10 days. I know these are complaints about Melio but Intuit made the decision to bring them in and it has been a disaster for me. Quickbooks could care less.

Suhail
アラブ首長国連邦のSenior Accountant
教育管理, 501~1,000人規模の会社
使用期間: 2年以上
投稿経路

Quickbooks Reiew

4.0 2 か月前 新着

製品を使ってみた感想: I tracked down it an extraordinary decision for fair size and enormous organizations particularly those with huge inventories yet it's excessively costly and complex for private companies.

良いポイント:

The accompanying 3 cool highlights of QuickBooks Venture are invigorating. Client prepayments: Here we can undoubtedly record and track client prepayments and stores on deals orders. Then consequently apply the installments when deals orders are switched over completely to a receipt. Thing classification upgrades: we can oversee stock all the more actually with far reaching staggered order. We can now set granular estimating rules by classifications in Cutting edge valuing to assist with working on the primary concern. Simpler HR organization: Directors get proactive notices that let them know when a profile is deficient, empowering quick development and further developed efficiency.

改善してほしい点:

Despite the fact that Quickbooks is a main ERP on the lookout, I tracked down following not many drawbacks to the product. Far less computerization apparatuses than cloud bookkeeping programming like Oracle Fusion or net suite. Reports could be more straightforward to channel and sort. Receipt structures could be more adaptable. Matching up credits in Cover Bills can be testing, particularly on the off chance that you commit an error.

Laura
英国のGrant Compliance Officer
教育管理, 1,001~5,000人規模の会社
使用期間: 2年以上
投稿経路

Enhancing our Campus Finances.

5.0 2 週間前 新着

製品を使ってみた感想: QuickBooks Enterprise has transformed our university into a financial hub where budgets balance automatically, and receipts organise themselves. Our users quickly create cost-benefit analysis for their research ideas, while department heads use interactive dashboards to guide the institution's financial decisions.

良いポイント:

QuickBooks Enterprise centralises financial management for all departments, from research labs to student organisations, creating a unified system that simplifies auditing and reporting. The platform is scalable, adjusting to changes in grant funding and student enrollment throughout the academic year. Moreover, it offers advanced tracking that provides new insights into how resources are allocated, which could lead to competition between departments over funding.

改善してほしい点:

It may sometime have difficulty handling the complex financial setups, like managing endowments or allocating specialised research funds.