--- description: Open LMSを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Open LMSとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [LMS（学習管理システム）](/directory/30020/learning-management-system/software) > [Open LMS](/software/207738/open-lms) # Open LMS Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/207738/open-lms ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/207738/open-lms?page=2) > 完全に管理されたソリューションを備えたオンライン学習プラットフォームにより、コースの管理や魅力的なコンテンツの提供が容易になります。 > > 評価：10人のユーザーによる評価は**4.7/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Open LMSの対象ユーザー Open LMSは、あらゆる業界や規模の幼稚園、小中学校、高校、単科大学、大学、組織をサポートしています。カスタマイズされた学習エクスペリエンスを創出し、クライアントが独自のビジネス・ニーズを満たすお手伝いをします。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.7/5** | 10 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.9/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Learning Technologies Group - **設立**: 2011 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **対象となる企業**: 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ）, Linux（デスクトップ）, Windows（オンプレミス）, Linux（オンプレミス）, Chromebook（デスクトップ）, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: スペイン語, フランス語, ポルトガル語, 日本語, 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アイルランド, アメリカ合衆国, アルジェリア, アルゼンチン, アルバ, アルバニア, アンギラ, アンゴラ, アンティグア・バーブーダ, アンドラ, イギリス, イタリア, インド, ウォリス・フツナ, ウガンダ, ウクライナ, ウルグアイ, エクアドル, エジプト さらに165件 ## 機能 - SCORM準拠 - ゲーミフィケーション - コンテンツ管理 - コースの追跡 - コース管理 - ソーシャルラーニング - テスト／評価 - ポータルサイト - モバイルラーニング - ラーニングパス／追跡 - 同時学習 - 組み込みのコース作成機能 - 証明書およびライセンス - 進捗の追跡 - 集合研修 - 非同期型eラーニング ## 統合 (合計13件) - Aspire - ChatGPT - Class for Web - Ease - Go1 - Honorlock - IntelliBoard - Kaltura Video Platform - Motrain - OpenSesame - Panopto - SMOWL - Sumadi ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース ## Category - [LMS（学習管理システム）](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30020/learning-management-system/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [LMS（学習管理システム）](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30020/learning-management-system/software) - [モバイル学習ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30954/mobile-learning/software) - [オンライン研修ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10008/training/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Canvas](https://www.capterra.jp/software/127214/canvas) — 4.6/5 (4326 reviews) 2. [Moodle](https://www.capterra.jp/software/80691/moodle) — 4.3/5 (3386 reviews) 3. [Connecteam](https://www.capterra.jp/software/153140/connecteam) — 4.6/5 (5298 reviews) 4. [Absorb LMS](https://www.capterra.jp/software/61763/absorb-lms) — 4.5/5 (349 reviews) 5. [360Learning](https://www.capterra.jp/software/211429/360learning) — 4.7/5 (503 reviews) ## レビュー ### "A solid product only limited by your imagination" — 4.0/5 > **Allison** | *2026年5月4日* | 政府関係 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The system is used by many institutions so courses are transferable. It is logical to use,not always easy though. Course creation can be done by most computer literate people and compared to other LMS', they have commented that Moodle is practical, interactive, and easier to use. As an administration it is good to have the service support just an email away. > > **改善点**: The system is large so all features are not fully used and unless you are dedicated Admin manager of your system, many of the Admin features can be difficult to fully understand. The activities do not present as sexy as they do in other platforms. The Community is hard to search and rarely do I find answers. > > I like Moodle, I like the support, I just don't like the fact that my particular site is not aesthetically pleasing and we lack after course interaction, I lack the knowledge and imagination to improve it and I don't know where to find the inspiration. ----- ### "Solid architecture and managed learning, but with severe operational and integration constraints in the long term." — 5.0/5 > **Carlos Guillermo** | *2026年5月4日* | 教育管理 | おすすめ評価：7.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Personalized Learning Designer (PLD): The capability to automate workflows via conditional rules is solid. However, it presents operational difficulties during course content restoration processes; when restoring a course into a new target environment, the new course frequently struggles to maintain the optimal functionality and execution of these inherited rules. > > **改善点**: 1. Closed Architecture and Integration Friction: Being a highly managed and closed environment, there is a severe backend lockout. There is an inability to perform advanced SQL queries, and when utilizing the ad-hoc reporting module, query execution is sluggish and prone to crashing. Furthermore, delayed-execution reports take an excessive amount of time to generate. Additionally, obtaining robust reporting capabilities requires licensing third-party products at exorbitant costs, often rivaling the core Open LMS licensing fees themselves, rather than providing a native advanced reporting system commensurate with its high pricing tier. 2. Rigidity in Plugin Deployment: The process of incorporating plugins is highly cost-inefficient, as clients are forced to pay for the adaptation of any plugin not already included in their proprietary matrix to ensure compatibility with Open LMS. This directly conflicts with the open-source philosophy of Moodle, which boasts over 2,000 free plugins. It is structurally paradoxical to incur development costs to deploy a plugin that is natively free in standard Moodle environments. 3. Asymmetrical Active User Cost Structure: The pricing model based on active users is disproportionately expensive, as clients inevitably pay for the retention of historical data used strictly for reporting purposes. It is fundamentally illogical to incur the same licensing fee for an alumnus whose data has been dormant for a decade as for a highly active, concurrent user interacting with the platform daily. > > My overall experience following an extended customer lifecycle has been a dichotomy between operational excellence and technological restriction. For years, Open LMS functioned as a flawless learning management engine; its open-source-based core, optimized for cloud architecture, eliminates the friction of server administration and delivers uninterrupted availability, fully justifying its deployment in critical institutional environments. Instructional design tools, such as the PLD, are top-tier for facilitating teacher-student interaction. However, a comprehensive long-term evaluation reveals a distinct technical glass ceiling. As institutional requirements evolve toward advanced data science, the integration of external artificial intelligence models, or the imperative for absolute technological sovereignty over database architectures, the 'sandbox' nature of Open LMS becomes a severe operational bottleneck. The bureaucratic friction required to enable specific extensions and the incremental cost model ultimately lead to technological stagnation. It remains an exceptional product for organizations that prioritize total infrastructure delegation, but it is highly restrictive for institutions demanding architectural flexibility, deep process auditing, and contractual independence over their proprietary information ecosystems. ----- ### "OpenLMS Moodle honest review" — 5.0/5 > **Korab** | *2026年6月11日* | 教育管理 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The OpenLMS team is supportive and helpful when you need them. The platform works well, but it has many settings, so at times you need to contact support and ask for help. They are always helpful. Moodle can do better in the design part to match other LMS's, but with each update, there are some improvements. It is a cheaper platform, and instructors can do all the tasks they need to teach courses. It is good that it's an open-source LMS, so many users can contribute to making Moodle better. OpenLMS carefully adds those features to our Moodle. > > **改善点**: The amount of time it takes to fix some bugs. Depending on the importance, it can take a couple of updates for a bug to get fixed. > > As I listed in the pros, the OpenLMS team is supportive when needed, proactive about cybersecurity, and regularly releases updates. Great experience working with them\! ----- ### "Leave well-enough alone and focus instead on needed improvements" — 4.0/5 > **Kirsten** | *2026年5月5日* | Eラーニング | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I appreciate --the helpful staff --the fact that it is reliable --it's Moodle --we don't need to worry about it --the site is functional > > **改善点**: Things we dislike --the theme (and lack of theme choices) --unnecessary changes, especially when other aspects need more attention --the updates often make the system less usable and user-friendly instead of more usable and user-friendly ----- ### "Interacción de estudiantes e docentes" — 5.0/5 > **匿名ユーザー** | *2025年7月17日* | 教育管理 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Sus opciones de Aprendizaje personalizado, en el tema de integraciones y otros funcionalidades que complementan al moodle nativo. > > **改善点**: En su inicio el tema de tener una matriz de plugin permitidos, no poder agregar mas temas de sitio, formatos de cursos y otros plugin. > > Muy buena, en mi caso a nivel de administrador de sitio, es una plataforma bien trabajada y que ofrecen cambios constantemente. ----- ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/207738/open-lms?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/207738/open-lms) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## 構造化データ