--- description: Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suiteを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suiteとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [EDCシステム](/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) > [Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite](/software/192454/research-manager) # Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/192454/research-manager ページ：1 / 6\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/192454/research-manager?page=2) > データに付加価値を提供します。Reseach Managerは、プロセス管理とデータ収集が統合された調査プラットフォームです。 > > 評価：118人のユーザーによる評価は**4.2/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suiteの対象ユーザー 医療機器、製薬／バイオテクノロジー、CROや投資家、学術機関、医療、医療倫理委員会など、さまざまな分野での実績があります。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.2/5** | 118 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.0/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.0/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.1/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.0/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 80% | (8/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Cloud9-Software - **ロケーション**: Deventer, オランダ - **設立**: 2013 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース - **サポートされる言語**: オランダ語, ドイツ語, 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アイルランド, アゼルバイジャン, アフガニスタン, アメリカ合衆国, アラブ首長国連邦, アルジェリア, アルゼンチン, アルバ, アルバニア, アルメニア, アンギラ, アンゴラ, アンティグア・バーブーダ, アンドラ, イエメン, イギリス, イスラエル, イタリア, イラク さらに204件 ## 機能 - 21 CFR Part 11準拠 - HIPAA準拠 - Third-Party Integrations - コンプライアンス管理 - スケジューリング - データのインポート／エクスポート - トライアル・デザイン - ドキュメント分類 - ドキュメント画像化 - ドキュメント管理 - フォーム管理 - リモート・データ・キャプチャ - レポート／分析 - ワークフロー管理 - 分散キャプチャ - 在庫管理 - 患者モニタリング - 患者リクルートメント - 患者管理 - 画像キャプチャ - 監査証跡 - 財務管理 - 電子データキャプチャ - 電子医療記録・電子カルテ ## 統合 (合計10件) - AFAS Software - Clue - ExactSpent - Fitbit - Freestyle Solutions - Polar - Samsung SDS - Wahoo Trace - Whoop - Zwift ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [EDCシステム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [EDCシステム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) - [臨床試験管理システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) - [データ入力ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30543/data-entry/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Castor EDC](https://www.capterra.jp/software/143532/castor-edc) — 4.7/5 (204 reviews) 2. [Florence eBinders](https://www.capterra.jp/software/200364/florence-ebinders) — 4.5/5 (83 reviews) 3. [Flex Databases platform](https://www.capterra.jp/software/124010/flex-databases-platform) — 4.5/5 (13 reviews) 4. [TrialKit](https://www.capterra.jp/software/149821/clinical-studio) — 4.5/5 (35 reviews) 5. [CRIO](https://www.capterra.jp/software/166083/clinical-research-io) — 4.5/5 (21 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Excellent software" — 5.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2023年9月2日* | 病院、ヘルスケア | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Can exchange data with other research teams, even those working on projects at different trial sites.Provides the ability for electronic signatures, making it simpler to get informed approval from study participants and record it. > > **改善点**: Time consuming when transferring large data set from the application ----- ### "Descent EDC" — 4.0/5 > **Noudjoum** | *2026年6月24日* | 薬品 | おすすめ評価：6.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I liked the ease of use of it, the validation steps were easy and not too much complainte from the sites about data entry. The reporting is good. > > **改善点**: The roles \! They are all prédéfined in the system and cannot be customized, the query management is not convenient, and the customer service is in Rurope which made it difficult for urgent matters. > > I run three studies on it and the three of them run smoothly. Data entry was easy, data validation was easy too. The lock and data extraction were also straight forward. ----- ### "User-friendly system with potential for improvement" — 3.0/5 > **Marta** | *2026年6月25日* | 病院、ヘルスケア | おすすめ評価：5.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: What I liked most about ResearchManager is that, from a monitor’s perspective, the system is quite intuitive and easy to navigate. The layout is clear and logical, which makes it relatively easy to find the necessary information. > > **改善点**: From a monitor’s perspective, the weakest point is that SDV can only be performed for closed visits, and only at the page level rather than for individual data points. In other systems, I have seen a more practical solution where each data point has a default status of “SDV not performed”, which can then be changed to “SDV performed” or “SDV not OK”. If “SDV performed” is selected and the site subsequently changes the entered data, the status automatically changes to “Data changed after SDV”. In my opinion, this functionality greatly facilitates monitoring and the tracking of all data changes. Another problematic aspect is the lack of possibility to raise queries in empty visits. In such cases, I have to contact the site separately by email and provide screenshots from the eCRF to indicate the missing data. It would also be very helpful if the query status were clearly visible, i.e. whether a query has already been addressed and closed or whether it still requires action. Currently, it is only visible that a query has been raised for a given parameter, but the actual status is not clear. In addition, in the query list, it would be very useful to see the specific queries linked to specific parameters, rather than only the sections in which the queries were raised. If there are many parameters and several queries, it is easy to overlook one of them. > > Overall, my experience has been positive. I find the system quite intuitive and easy to work with, but I think some improvements, especially in SDV and query management, could make it even better :) ----- ### "Easy of use in multicenter trials" — 5.0/5 > **Mikko** | *2026年6月24日* | 病院、ヘルスケア | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Everything in order and in the same place. Easy to access form anywhere and esay to learn how to use. Makes performing a trial a lot easier. > > **改善点**: The automatic query, when missed filling a required field- would be nicer to remind that nort all required fields are filled yet, do you really want to "save as complete"? > > I use it regularly in a multicenter- trial as a head of corelab. Although all the parties involved are located in different countries, this no longer makes any difference. ----- ### "Efficient Clinical Research Management Platform with Strong Workflow Capabilities" — 4.0/5 > **Mateusz** | *2026年6月11日* | 研究 | おすすめ評価：6.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The platform helps centralize study management activities in one place, improving collaboration between research teams. I particularly appreciated the document management functionality, workflow support, and the ability to track study progress efficiently. The system promotes better organization and transparency across research projects. > > **改善点**: The user interface can feel somewhat complex for first-time users, and some advanced functions are not immediately intuitive. Additional customization options for reports and dashboards would be beneficial. The initial setup and onboarding process may require dedicated training. > > Overall, my experience with Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite has been positive. The platform provides a comprehensive environment for managing research activities and helps streamline administrative and operational tasks. While there is a learning curve, the benefits in terms of organization, compliance support, and workflow efficiency outweigh the challenges. It is a valuable solution for research organizations seeking to improve study management processes. ----- ページ：1 / 6\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/192454/research-manager?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/192454/research-manager) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## 構造化データ