--- description: Revitを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Revitとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [建設エンジニアリングプロジェクト管理ツール](/directory/20002/architecture/software) > [Revit](/software/183122/revit) # Revit Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/183122/revit ページ：1 / 21\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/183122/revit?page=2) > Revit BIMソフトウェアには、建築設計、機械・電気・配管 (MEP)、構造エンジニアリング、建設用の各種機能が含まれています。 > > 評価：484人のユーザーによる評価は**4.6/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Revitの対象ユーザー 建築・建設会社がコラボレーションを通じてフロア・プランを作成し、モデルをレンダリングして、設計を共有できるように設計されたBIMソリューション。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.6/5** | 484 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.0/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.1/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Autodesk - **ロケーション**: San Rafael, アメリカ - **設立**: 1982 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $365.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: Windows（デスクトップ）, Windows（オンプレミス） - **サポートされる言語**: イタリア語, スペイン語, チェコ語, ドイツ語, フランス語, ポルトガル語, ポーランド語, ロシア語, 中国語, 日本語, 繁体中国語, 英語, 韓国語 - **利用可能な国**: アイルランド, アメリカ合衆国, アラブ首長国連邦, イギリス, イタリア, インド, オランダ, オーストラリア, オーストリア, カナダ, シンガポール, スイス, スウェーデン, スペイン, デンマーク, トルコ, ドイツ, ニュージーランド, ノルウェー, フィンランド さらに8件 ## 機能 - 2D図面 - 3D画像処理 - 3D設計、モデリング - BIMモデリング - CADツール - Third-Party Integrations - アニメーション - コラボレーションツール - コンポーネント・ライブラリ - スケジューリング - スケッチ、メモツール - データのインポート／エクスポート - ドキュメント管理 - ファイル管理 - プレゼンテーション・ツール - プロジェクト管理 - レンダリング - ワークフロー管理 - 注釈 - 草案作成 - 設計テンプレート - 設計モデリング - 設計管理 ## 統合 (合計5件) - AutoCAD - Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud) - Dynamo Software - Enscape - Navisworks ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート ## Category - [建設エンジニアリングプロジェクト管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/20002/architecture/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [建設エンジニアリングプロジェクト管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/20002/architecture/software) - [BIMソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31000/bim/software) - [建設スケジュールソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31522/construction-scheduling/software) - [Other Construction Software](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/34536/other-construction/software) - [3D CAD ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31236/3d-cad/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud)](https://www.capterra.jp/software/218046/autodesk-construction-cloud) — 4.3/5 (2212 reviews) 2. [ARCHICAD](https://www.capterra.jp/software/2018/archicad) — 4.4/5 (280 reviews) 3. [Procore](https://www.capterra.jp/software/56250/procore) — 4.5/5 (2677 reviews) 4. [AutoCAD](https://www.capterra.jp/software/174021/autocad) — 4.6/5 (3481 reviews) 5. [SketchUp](https://www.capterra.jp/software/211798/sketchup) — 4.5/5 (1047 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Revit best software for AEC industry" — 5.0/5 > **Kevin** | *2025年1月9日* | 建築、設計 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Revit is an all encompassing BIM modeling program. It is great for generating models for a project that also translates to rendering/animation/VR, plans, details, elevations, sections, schedules and sheets. There is so much you can do with Revit and so many add-ons that make this program the premier program for the AEC industry. > > **改善点**: I do not like that you can not go back version of Revit, meaning if a project is started in 2024 year version, you can not open that model in 2023 year version. > > I have been using Revit for over 15 years and have watched how it has grown and mor ----- ### "Efficient and reliable software as an Architect." — 5.0/5 > **Christopher** | *2023年7月12日* | 建築、設計 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Its features and solid layout. It shows that a lot of attention has been given to the development of the software. > > **改善点**: It could be improved upon in the early sketch phase. Its complexity and feature sets also makes it less unobtrusive of the early design stages. > > A solid contender to other Architecture software. Well built up software\! ----- ### "Complicate algorithm lead to lot of problems" — 3.0/5 > **Elias** | *2022年11月28日* | 機械・産業工学 | おすすめ評価：3.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Working without families, has few problems in piping connection especially (as mechanical). I think as from Architectural side few problems we have (such fix the model automatically for epsilon of errors), I create an add-ins using C\# to fix this and find errors of an Architectural model or mechanical spaces. > > **改善点**: The illogical behavior of some functions in families and contradictions, even in 3D presentation with thin metal sheets. > > I have few experience with Architectural model since I am a mechanical engineer. moderate experience in MEP drawing, but enough experience in families which I hate in Revit.Also I have 6 months in programming with Revit using C\#, and I found the object oriented classes and objects are interfered to infinity (as I guess) where it can be in easy way, this core issues lead to the complication in Revit especially as I think, in families the procedures start to solve the parameters in a way lead to unsatisfied solution where it run properly. ----- ### "Forever Revit" — 5.0/5 > **JAZE** | *2021年8月21日* | 建築、設計 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Right away I saw that this tool was more purpose-based than all the other tools I've used before which were more broad-based, so I was really happy with that. Another thing I noticed was that Revit mimics real life building elements in a smart, geometric way, it does automatic calculations and schedules plus it reduces the possibility of creating human errors. Multiple users can use the same file at the same time. This software is just simply GOLDEN\!\! > > **改善点**: I did feel at first like I bit off way more than I could chew on but as the weeks progressed, I couldn't wait to dive in and learn something new about it because when it started to gradually make sense to me, there was no looking back after that. Revit was all I needed from then onwards. > > This was the most fun, it was very enjoyable and I remember asking myself why I didn't just trust my inner hunch and learn how to use this software earlier on in my life? Oh well... better late than never right...lol. ----- ### "Insightful design software" — 4.0/5 > **Chanaka** | *2021年9月2日* | 土木工学 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Another great solution from Autodesk. In Revit, we have the ability to draw, design, and model structures depending on our needs. With tools to draw in 2D and easily model it into 3D, Revit is the solution architectures and civil engineers have been looking for. And especially with modeling and presentation tools Revit is the whole package. This package can be effectively used for architectural, structural, HVAC, and MEP modeling. And with enhanced support from other Autodesk applications, Revit seems like the industry-standard design software. > > **改善点**: The main disadvantage is the higher price value for Revit. So middle and startup companies have to think twice before purchasing Revit. Also somewhat harder to create complex models. And for a beginner, this would be harder to learn and use. > > Considering the compatibility with other Autodesk applications and helpful features such as 2D and 3D drawing, BIM modeling, presentation tools this is a great application to use. But it comes with a larger price tag. Can be used for many purposes and currently, this is the industry standard for designing. Designing complex structures will be harder but considering advantages and disadvantages this is a good application to use. ----- ページ：1 / 21\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/183122/revit?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/183122/revit) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## 構造化データ