--- description: SciSureを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: SciSureとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [ラボラトリー情報管理システム (LIMS)](/directory/31523/laboratory-information-management-system/software) > [SciSure](/software/180309/elabjournal) # SciSure Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/180309/elabjournal ページ：1 / 5\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/180309/elabjournal?page=2) > eLabJournalは、安全で完全にカスタマイズ可能な法令遵守のオールインワンELNです。ライフ・サイエンス研究開発所に適しています。 > > 評価：100人のユーザーによる評価は**4.3/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### SciSureの対象ユーザー \- どのような規模の研究所にも適しています。円滑に導入できるようにサポートします。 - 厳格なポリシーを遵守する必要がある組織向けです。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.3/5** | 100 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.5/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.1/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 80% | (8/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: eLabNext - **設立**: 2010 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格モデル**: (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ）, Windows（オンプレミス）, Linux（オンプレミス）, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: ドイツ語, フランス語, 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アイルランド, アゼルバイジャン, アフガニスタン, アメリカ合衆国, アラブ首長国連邦, アルジェリア, アルゼンチン, アルバ, アルバニア, アルメニア, アンギラ, アンゴラ, アンティグア・バーブーダ, アンドラ, イエメン, イギリス, イスラエル, イタリア, イラク さらに205件 ## 機能 - Barcode/Ticket Scanning - EDI - Protocol/SOP Management - アクセス制御・許可 - コラボレーションツール - コンプライアンス管理 - コンプライアンス追跡 - サンプル管理 - タスク管理 - データのインポート／エクスポート - データの取得と転送 - データストレージ管理 - データ同期 - プロジェクト管理 - レポート／分析 - ワークフロー管理 - 在庫管理 - 在庫管理 - 情報ガバナンス - 注文管理 ## 統合 (合計7件) - Calira - Google Drive - Mendeley - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft PowerPoint - Microsoft Word - Mobile App ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート - チャット対応有 ## Category - [ラボラトリー情報管理システム (LIMS)](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31523/laboratory-information-management-system/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [ラボラトリー情報管理システム (LIMS)](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31523/laboratory-information-management-system/software) - [電子実験ノートソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/33055/electronic-lab-notebook/software) - [データ管理ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31003/data-management/software) - [在庫管理システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30006/inventory-management/software) - [メディカルラボソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/20043/medical-lab/software) ## 代替製品 1. [LabCollector LIMS](https://www.capterra.jp/software/94168/labcollector-lims) — 4.2/5 (24 reviews) 2. [CDD Vault](https://www.capterra.jp/software/171280/cdd-vault) — 4.9/5 (23 reviews) 3. [SciNote](https://www.capterra.jp/software/156310/scinote-electronic-lab-notebook) — 4.5/5 (62 reviews) 4. [STARLIMS](https://www.capterra.jp/software/8940/starlims) — 4.2/5 (17 reviews) 5. [Xybion LIMS](https://www.capterra.jp/software/135242/labwise) — 5.0/5 (1 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Functionality and Superb Customer Support" — 5.0/5 > **Maura** | *2021年10月8日* | 高等教育 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Working with the team at eLab Journal to implement our LIMS and make enhancements as our laboratory has grown has been a wonderful experience. Everyone we have worked with is responsive and collaborative. The software itself has amazing functionality and provides the features we need to act as an efficient, high throughput testing laboratory. > > **改善点**: When we implemented the software in 2020, some of the menu items and navigation seemed disjointed and not exceptionally intuitive. eLab Journal has evolved since then and we have seen improvements. The team is also open to our feedback as system users. > > Our overall experience with eLab Journal has been exceptional. We are glad we chose to partner with them because they were definitely the right choice\! They have helped us immensely and we would not have achieved a successful project outcome without them. ----- ### "eLabNext recommendation" — 5.0/5 > **Helene** | *2024年11月1日* | バイオテクノロジー | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Easy to use, modular, everything is tracable > > **改善点**: Takes some time to set it up at first, but then you quickly get a lot of benefits > > Userfriendly. Very helpful customer support ----- ### "Bioraft / SciShield is a Chemical Compliance Software That Fails to Deliver" — 1.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2024年12月26日* | 化学 | おすすめ評価：0.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Lightweight Basic Functionality (very basic) Ability to upload training data > > **改善点**: Bioraft - Scishield is a low-quality system for chemical inventory management required by laboratories, industries, and organizations that deal with hazardous materials and will need to rely on accurate chemical tracking, hazards, and safety. Cons: The software 1) Bioraft - SciShield is one of the lowest-quality chemical inventory management systems on the market. 2) Bioraft - SciShield does not facilitate regulatory compliance due to inability to generate detailed reports, track expiration dates, and ensure proper storage. It lacks integration with other essential systems and safety compliance databases. 3) Bioraft - SciShield has poorly designed menus and unintuitive controls and is outdated and clunky. 4) Bioraft - Scishield has no link to safety data sheets other than a link to Google search, no SDS library management, and offers a simple downloaded CSV of what each lab manually entered. 5) Bioraft - Scishield provides no information in database format to download a list of your chemicals, with corresponding hazard classes, GSH codes, pictograms, proper cabinet container storage, or sortable queries based on any criteria. 6) Bioraft- Scishield, has bugs, fails to save data, often can not add chemicals due some type of error, and it is very clear the developers care very little about delivering a functional product offering insufficient customer support. Cons: Customer Support A frustrating software often comes with poor customer support. Here concerns are not taken seriously, and suggestions are not welcome. The technical representative was dismissive, unhelpful, and he lacked basic knowledge about the issue and its software. To make matters worse, no return phone calls, menu options on call in , etc etc. Universities should invest in systems that are essential for ensuring accuracy, safety, and long-term efficiency. This is not one of them. > > Bioraft - Scishield is a very low-quality system with no SDS libraries, no real-time inventory tracking, no automated GSH, haz class reporting, and poor customer technical support. Offering a simple download of an Excel spreadsheet that the user enters with no function defeats the purpose of having software in the first place. ----- ### "A useful everyday tool." — 5.0/5 > **Angela** | *2023年8月10日* | バイオテクノロジー | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Easy to use, traceable and auditable. Helps planning, organisation and tracking of work. > > **改善点**: Labelling of images, gel images for example, is tricky and much easier to do in other packages and bring in the images already labelled. > > Would never go back to a paper based system now. ----- ### "eLab Protocols offers a great all-in-one solution to protocol development and refinement" — 5.0/5 > **Austin** | *2023年10月26日* | バイオテクノロジー | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The template generation and easy iteration of commonly used protocols in the lab has and will continue to be invaluable for our operations across our two sites. > > **改善点**: The slow adoption of the protocols function within the eLab protocol may be attributed to some of the clunky nature of generating a protocol from scratch in eLab, which can be challenging from a format perspective. However, generating the outline in a 3rd party platform such as Microsoft Word and then utilizing the import function has been great for generating rapid protocol skeletons that can then be populated/fine-tuned based on the user. Also the lack of a spell-check function makes 3rd party platforms more effecitive for generating error-free templates. > > So far my experience with eLab Protocols has been great and has offered an easy and streamlined means for communicating methologies that have worked well and for iterating on as these methods improve. I am excited to utilize the AI-based protocol generator function in this step of the process as well since it showed some promising outputs on some preliminary demos I performed. It still generates/hallucinates citations and can provide . ----- ページ：1 / 5\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/180309/elabjournal?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/180309/elabjournal) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## 構造化データ