--- description: POEditorを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: POEditorとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [翻訳ツール](/directory/30934/translation-management/software) > [POEditor](/software/179447/poeditor) # POEditor Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/179447/poeditor ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/179447/poeditor?page=2) > あらゆる規模のチームやワークフローに適したオンライン翻訳管理システムおよびローカリゼーション・プラットフォーム。 > > 評価：17人のユーザーによる評価は**4.7/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### POEditorの対象ユーザー アプリ、Webサイト、ゲームなどのソフトウェア製品の翻訳およびローカリゼーション・プロセスの自動化を検討しているユーザー。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.7/5** | 17 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.7/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: CODE WHALE - **ロケーション**: JEFFERSONVILLE, アメリカ ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $20.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アイルランド, アゼルバイジャン, アフガニスタン, アメリカ合衆国, アラブ首長国連邦, アルジェリア, アルゼンチン, アルバ, アルバニア, アルメニア, アンギラ, アンゴラ, アンティグア・バーブーダ, アンドラ, イエメン, イギリス, イスラエル, イタリア, イラク さらに208件 ## 機能 - Translation Memory - アクセス制御・許可 - アラート／通知 - コメント、メモ - コラボレーションツール - コンテンツ管理 - タスク管理 - プロジェクト管理 - プロジェクト追跡 - レポートと統計 - ワークフロー管理 - 多言語 - 機械翻訳 - 用語管理 - 自動ローカライゼーション - 進捗の追跡 ## 統合 (合計18件) - Azure Blob Storage - Azure DevOps - Bitbucket - Claude - DeepL Pro - Figma - Gemini - GitHub - GitLab - Google Cloud Storage - Google翻訳 - Microsoft Entra ID - Microsoft Teams - Okta - OneLogin ... さらに3件の統合 ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - チャット対応有 ## Category - [翻訳ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30934/translation-management/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [翻訳ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30934/translation-management/software) - [ローカライゼーション](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/32975/localization-software/software) - [生産性向上ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30968/productivity/software) - [グループウェア](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/15/collaboration/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Google翻訳](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1013631/google-translate) — 4.5/5 (690 reviews) 2. [Crowdin](https://www.capterra.jp/software/163509/crowdin) — 4.7/5 (177 reviews) 3. [Phrase](https://www.capterra.jp/software/151871/Phrase) — 4.6/5 (274 reviews) 4. [DeepL Pro](https://www.capterra.jp/software/219412/deepl-pro) — 4.7/5 (155 reviews) 5. [Tolgee](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1039225/tolgee) — 4.6/5 (95 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Localization tool that fully meets the localization needs" — 4.0/5 > **Ozan** | *2019年7月18日* | コンピュータ・ソフトウェア | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: POEditor is an easy to use online localization tool for web and mobile projects. We unified all localization terms among web, iOS and Android platforms and manage translations on POEditor platform centrally. Its API gives the opportunity to update the localization content on the fly and updated on the clients instantly. Translators and colleagues should be assigned to the language pairs, so it makes collaboration very easy. > > **改善点**: API data gives lots of information about translated terms. It increases the data transferred for localization and make it difficult to manage translations over API. Price tiers are calculated per added term to languages. If the project has a huge amount of localized text price should be very high. ----- ### "POEditor for Open Source: Budget-Friendly Localization That Works" — 5.0/5 > **Anton** | *2023年12月20日* | コンピュータ・ソフトウェア | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Choosing POEditor for our open-source project has been a game-changer, especially given its generous free access for open-source projects. The platform's user-friendly interface and seamless collaboration tools have made the localization process a breeze for our team and streamlined multilingual content management. One standout feature we absolutely love is the use of tags. The ability to organize localization through tags and export them for use as namespaces with i18n has proven to be a game-changer. It adds a layer of flexibility and granularity to our localization strategy, allowing us to manage and deploy translations with a level of precision that aligns seamlessly with our project's needs. > > **改善点**: One thing that's worth mentioning is the inability to manually order translation keys. While it might not be a dealbreaker for everyone, our project occasionally requires a precise organization of keys, and this limitation has posed a minor challenge. It's a nuance that we've learned to work around, but it's something to consider, especially if your project heavily relies on meticulous key sequencing. ----- ### "Good, easy to use translation management platform, with quite a streep price" — 4.0/5 > **Wilco** | *2019年4月14日* | コンピュータ・ソフトウェア | おすすめ評価：6.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: POEditor is easy to use, gives you translation suggestions and allows others to contribute to translating your app by either an invite based system or just by allowing anyone to edit it. Nice API to use programs that allow you to integrate it with for example Gradle so you can easily update the language translations of your app. You can import and export transitions in many file formats, so they are easy to implement in your product, like Android XML and PO. > > **改善点**: No option as far as I know to, after allowing everyone to translate your project, exclude specific languages from being edited by someone else. For example, I only want to edit the English translation myself and not allow anyone else to change that. It has quite a steep price increase above the free tier, especially if you are using it for relatively small, not very high profit (open source) apps. > > It is a good platform if you can stay within the free tier. After that, it is only a good platform to use if your product has a relatively high profit. ----- ### "How to improve POEditor" — 4.0/5 > **Juan** | *2025年7月5日* | 翻訳、ローカライゼーション | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: How fast it responds to input, that it automatically saves everything you write on it and the search tool with its many options is excellent. > > **改善点**: The most annoying and frustrating part of POEditor is that when I go ahead and highlight a text in the target section to change it or edit it, I can’t, because I have to click on the text first so it gets activated and then you can highlight the part you want to change. This is very odd and quirky because in any other editor (like Travod’s Phrase, Trados Studio) you just directly highlights the text and can change it right away and unfortunately my brain is so used to this mechanic that, even after many months of using POEditor, I struggle to quickly and smoothly edit my work. It would be nice to have an option to show all the segments in a single page, so I can review or see a previous segment without having to go back pages to have a quick look. The segments should all be numbered so when I have to tell an editor about a question or an issue within a specific part of a project, I can direct them to the exact content and where it is. > > POEditor is a great tool however when I'm constantly clashing with remembering that I have to activate the text first, it gets me quite stressed. The good thing is that with the minor but important changes I just mentioned it can become so wonderful. ----- ### "Overall good experience for app texts" — 5.0/5 > **Kira** | *2025年8月25日* | 自動車 | おすすめ評価：7.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I am using POEditor for texts and translations on our application. The site is very easy to use, you set up a project, enter terms (which your programmers will use), and then set the languages you will use. It is very convenient that you have a "major" language, and then when you enter translations, it shows you the reference language on the same page, as well as the term. Also, the AI function on the auto translation has been handy several times. > > **改善点**: The fuzzy option in POEditor wasn't very clear to us. We never used the tagging as we didn't understand why would it be useful. Also not being able to: sort or filter within the project is inconvenient. Another downside is not being able to go directly to a certain page (say page 14 in my project, but I have to click next next next), which is highly time consuming and uncomfortable. I wouldn't create a split in the project either. Can't sort by ABC, it is always presented FIFO which I do find frustrating. > > Overall it is a very useful tool, it has a very good free version, but I do recommend the paid version as it gives a great value for money. I do hope they improve the human interface and work on the UI. ----- ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/179447/poeditor?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/179447/poeditor) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fi | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## 構造化データ