--- description: OnBoard Board Management Softwareを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: OnBoard Board Management Softwareとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [会議ツール](/directory/30802/meeting/software) > [OnBoard Board Management Software](/software/179015/onboard-board-portal) # OnBoard Board Management Software Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/179015/onboard-board-portal ページ：1 / 44\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/179015/onboard-board-portal?page=2) > OnBoard取締役会インテリジェンス・プラットフォームでは、複雑な取締役会のプロセスを簡素化して取締役会の効果を高めることができます。今すぐ無料トライアルをお試しください。 > > 評価：1069人のユーザーによる評価は**4.7/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### OnBoard Board Management Softwareの対象ユーザー 取締役会、取締役、取締役会管理者、経営管理者、最高レベルの経営幹部 (CEO、社長、CFO、CIO/CTO、COO、CMO)、ITリーダー、企業秘書。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.7/5** | 1069 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.8/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.5/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: OnBoard - **ロケーション**: Indianapolis, アメリカ ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格モデル**: (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Windows（オンプレミス）, Linux（オンプレミス） - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイルランド, アメリカ合衆国, イギリス, オーストラリア, カナダ, ニュージーランド ## 機能 - アクセス制御・許可 - イベント・スケジューリング - ドキュメント・ストレージ - ドキュメント管理 - 会議メモ - 調査、投票 - 電子署名 ## 統合 (合計3件) - Microsoft Project Server Subscription Edition - Microsoft Teams - Zoom Workplace ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [会議ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30802/meeting/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [会議ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30802/meeting/software) - [取締役会ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30899/board-management/software) - [ポータルツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/14/portal/software) - [グループウェア](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [非営利業務向けソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30805/nonprofit/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Diligent Boards](https://www.capterra.jp/software/149069/diligent-boards) — 4.7/5 (342 reviews) 2. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.jp/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (3042 reviews) 3. [Convene](https://www.capterra.jp/software/133609/convene) — 4.7/5 (152 reviews) 4. [Boardable](https://www.capterra.jp/software/163805/boardable) — 4.7/5 (128 reviews) 5. [Bitrix24](https://www.capterra.jp/software/113540/bitrix24) — 4.2/5 (1005 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Executive Assistant and Board Liaison" — 5.0/5 > **Heather** | *2026年9月11日* | 金融サービス | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: OnBoard has transformed how we prepare for and manage board and committee meetings. The platform is intuitive, easy to navigate, and provides a centralized location for agendas, board books, meeting materials, surveys, and minutes. The ability for board members to access materials from any device, annotate documents, and collaborate securely has significantly improved efficiency and engagement. The customer support team is also responsive, and the ongoing webinars and training resources are very helpful. > > **改善点**: There are a few administrative functions that could be more streamlined. For example, moving agenda items between meetings requires additional manual effort, and there are limited customization options within certain templates. At times, member management can be confusing, particularly when deactivated users continue to appear in certain areas of the platform. Some repetitive setup preferences, such as board book display settings, would benefit from the ability to save default selections. > > Overall, my experience with OnBoard has been extremely positive. The platform has helped modernize our governance processes and has become an essential tool for board administration. It has saved time, improved organization, enhanced communication with directors and committee members, and reduced the administrative burden associated with meeting preparation. The company continues to invest in improvements and provides excellent educational opportunities to help administrators maximize the platform's capabilities. I would highly recommend OnBoard to organizations looking for a comprehensive board management solution. ----- ### "centralized board management in one place" — 4.0/5 > **Athena** | *2026年9月2日* | 高等教育 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: what i liked most about onboard was how easy it made it to organize board materials, manage meetings, and keep everything in one centralized location. the platform is user-friendly, efficient, and makes communication and collaboration with board members much easier. > > **改善点**: what i liked least about onboard was that some features could be a little difficult to navigate at first, and certain processes took more steps than expected. there was also a slight learning curve when getting familiar with all of the platform’s features and settings. > > my overall experience with onboard has been positive. the platform makes it easy to organize board materials, access important documents, and manage meetings in one centralized location. while there is a slight learning curve with some features, overall it has been a useful and efficient tool for supporting board communication and organization. i think once you get the hang of it, its pretty easy. people who has never used onboard might get confused to be honest because there is a certain way to navigate stuff. ----- ### "OnBoard vs. Diligent Boards" — 3.0/5 > **Sara** | *2025年4月14日* | 非営利団体運営 | おすすめ評価：4.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: That is a good program to be a repository for information. > > **改善点**: I did not enjoy the layout and was not worth moving to this program from our current. ----- ### "AGCS Review of OnBoard" — 4.0/5 > **Belinda** | *2026年9月3日* | 非営利団体運営 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: What I like most about OnBoard is the ability to keep all board-related documents and information organized in one centralized location. The platform makes it easy to access meeting materials, reference previous documents, and maintain an organized record of board activities. Its user-friendly design has made managing and retrieving board information much more efficient. > > **改善点**: As a nonprofit organization, we must be intentional about how we allocate our financial resources and ensure that administrative expenses provide sufficient value to the organization. While OnBoard is an effective and valuable platform, the pricing can place additional pressure on a nonprofit’s operating budget. Higher technology and administrative costs can reduce the resources available to support programs, services, and other mission-focused priorities. More flexible nonprofit pricing, discounted rates, or scalable options would help organizations like ours continue to benefit from the platform while maintaining responsible stewardship of limited resources. > > Overall, my experience with OnBoard has been very positive. The platform is user-friendly, well-organized, and provides a convenient centralized location for board documents, meeting materials, and other important information. It has helped streamline our board administration by making materials easier to organize, access, and reference when needed. While pricing can be a challenge for a nonprofit organization operating within a limited budget, I believe OnBoard provides valuable functionality that supports efficient board management and good governance. ----- ### "Intuitive for both admins & end-users" — 5.0/5 > **Kellie** | *2026年9月16日* | 高等教育 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: OnBoard is intuitive, secure, and easy to use for administrators and board members. It streamlines agenda and board-book preparation, keeps meeting materials organized in one location, supports paperless governance, and makes it easy for members to access materials from any device. > > **改善点**: There can be a short learning curve for users transitioning from paper packets or less structured processes, and smaller organizations may need to weigh the subscription cost against their board-management needs. > > We are extremely happy with OnBoard and the value it has brought to our board-management process. The platform is intuitive, reliable, and easy to use for both administrators and board members. For administrators, OnBoard makes it simple to prepare meeting materials, organize agendas, distribute board books, manage updates, and keep everything in one secure, accessible location. It has streamlined many of our processes and reduced the time spent coordinating documents and communications. Our board members have also responded very positively to the experience. They can easily access meeting information, review materials, participate in discussions, and stay organized without needing extensive training or technical support. The interface is clean and user-friendly, which has helped encourage adoption across a range of comfort levels with technology. Overall, OnBoard has made our board operations more efficient, professional, and organized. We would highly recommend it to any organization looking for a dependable and user-friendly board management solution. ----- ページ：1 / 44\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/179015/onboard-board-portal?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/179015/onboard-board-portal) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## 構造化データ