--- description: CardBoardを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: CardBoardとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [製品管理システム](/directory/30865/product-management/software) > [CardBoard](/software/176690/cardboard) # CardBoard Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/176690/cardboard ページ：1 / 8\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/176690/cardboard?page=2) > CardBoardは、チームが協力して製品アイデア、ユーザー体験、カスタマー・ジャーニーなどを探索して視覚化する際に役に立ちます。 > > 評価：170人のユーザーによる評価は**4.2/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### CardBoardの対象ユーザー リアルタイムのコラボレーション、追跡ツールとの統合、ビジュアル・ダッシュボードを通じて、事業者がプロジェクト、招待、ユーザー・ストーリー・マッピングなどを管理する際に役に立つクラウド・ベースのプロジェクト・プランニング・ソリューションです。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.2/5** | 170 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.0/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 3.9/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 80% | (8/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: CardBoard - **ロケーション**: Carmel, アメリカ - **設立**: 2016 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $10.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ） - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アメリカ合衆国, インド, オーストラリア, カナダ, 日本 ## 機能 - アイデア管理 - アラート／通知 - コメント、メモ - コラボレーションツール - コンテンツ管理 - スプリント計画 - タスク管理 - タスク進捗追跡 - チャット、メッセージング - テンプレートのカスタマイズ - データのインポート／エクスポート - ドラッグ・アンド・ドロップ - バックログ管理 - プロジェクト計画 - モバイル・アクセス - リリース計画 - レポートと統計 - ロードマッピング - ワークフロー管理 - 優先順位付け - 製品ロードマッピング - 要件管理 - 進捗の追跡 - 顧客プロフィール ## 統合 (合計3件) - Confluence - Jira - Pivotal Tracker ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - 電話サポート - チャット対応有 ## Category - [製品管理システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30865/product-management/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [製品管理システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30865/product-management/software) - [カスタマージャーニーマップツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31537/customer-journey-mapping-tools/software) - [カンバンツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31580/kanban-tools/software) - [スクラムツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31581/scrum/software) - [グループウェア](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/15/collaboration/software) ## 代替製品 1. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.jp/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6037 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.jp/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15371 reviews) 3. [Aha\!](https://www.capterra.jp/software/144020/aha) — 4.7/5 (561 reviews) 4. [Trello](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23533 reviews) 5. [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.jp/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4584 reviews) ## レビュー ### "CardBoard" — 4.0/5 > **Peter** | *2018年7月27日* | 金融サービス | おすすめ評価：7.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The simplicity of the tool, it provided me with what I wanted and did not over complicate it with features I did not need. > > **改善点**: The export to excel option was pretty messy, but then again why export it? What I wanted was a way to capture the full board visually to put into a document or communication, to show the overall Story Map (which I could not get in screen shots) I realize I could provide a link to the board for people to access and see the actual Map, but sometimes you just want a picture of it to support a communication. > > I stumbled upon CardBoard a long time ago (2011) when I wanted an easy way to capture a Story Map. I really liked how easy it was to drop cards, move them around, and add some comments. The Team really enjoyed the look and feel of it. It did what we wanted and nothing more. I'm not a heavy user of it, but when I do need to put together a Story Map, CardBoard is what I turn to. ----- ### "Cardboardit for developing roadmaps and communicating with stakeholders" — 4.0/5 > **Sean** | *2018年7月27日* | 小売 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The application is intuitive and it's very easy to demonstrate the importance of technical debt to stakeholders. > > **改善点**: The export capability is limited. The description of the cards can not be exported without printing each card individually. The board view PDF export is not as user friendly/aesthetically pleasing as the actual application. Stakeholders are asking for PDF exports, however, I hesitate to share due to the aforementioned reasons. > > The tool is great for presenting the roadmap to leadership, stakeholders, and Engineers. I would highly recommend it, however, would also suggest getting enough licences for all folks on your team due to the limited export capabilities. ----- ### "A great product if it's the only thing you were using." — 3.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2018年7月27日* | コンピュータ・ソフトウェア | おすすめ評価：6.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I liked that it was very easy to use. Almost everything was very click and drag, which made it really easy to onboard new users who were new to story mapping. I also really appreciated that it let me share a story map across multiple locations. I work with teams in SF and Seattle. A physical board is a nice idea but just not possible with the way that we are distributed. > > **改善点**: I had some challenges with user management. I work in a large enterprise so adding users individually was a bit of a pain and it was challenge to move users from regular viewer to user or admin roles on multiple boards. I also found that bulk moves of cards was difficult. If I wanted to pick up several cards and put them between two existing rows that wasn't really possible without spending 8 or 10 minutes rearranging the other cards around it to keep the map coherent. Also our org runs on-prem JIRA and I had no way to connect JIRA and confluence together, which made it nearly impossible to keep the two in sync. This is ultimately why I stopped using the product. > > I was attempting to bootstrap some existing teams so that they could start doing more end to end thinking about their products as we were designing and building them. ----- ### "Good but with some hiccups" — 4.0/5 > **Mark** | *2018年7月27日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：7.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I quite liked the intuitive interface and ease of storyboarding things. > > **改善点**: The JIRA integration left something to be desired. The software did not do a good job of informing me of what it would do when I synced the two. It was also not clear to me that this was not a constant sync. Changes in one product were not automatically migrated over to the other. This was especially problematic because later syncs of the stories and epics caused duplicates of the previously synchronized items to appear because the system did not identify previously sync'd stories. > > I found the software quite useful for basic storyboarding and brainstorming new projects. Unfortunately, due to the limitations of the JIRA integration and the nature of the work I'm doing, it just wasn't useful for anything other than large/complicated projects that need a fair amount of planning and it could only be used in the initial stages. Once I had the list of story "slugs" it was better to manually migrate the list over to JIRA and cease using Cardboard. ----- ### "The easy way to Story Mapping" — 5.0/5 > **Veselin** | *2018年8月2日* | コンピュータ・ソフトウェア | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: While working with paper and stickies is the most quick tool to adopt, sometimes a digital one is required, as it provides certain benefits (quick editing; sharing; remote collaboration). I liked that it required zero learning for the basics. I just did the storymaps without a hitch, no wondering how I can do this or that. Of course, it provides some advanced functionality, but for the pure, basic, stickies-on-the-wall, experience, you there isn't a learning curve. Just plug and do. > > **改善点**: The free version is said to work like the GitHub model - all boards are public. Everyone can see them and browse them. So far so good. However, unlike GitHub where you can use one of several ways to get your repository to other people (sharing a link, inviting them, telling them the name of the repo...) I didn't find any of it here. I could not share the free board to my colleagues (even for viewing). There is a workaround with exporting, which can get the job done. I understand this is their business model, but then the site should not describe it working as GitHub's public repos, as it, in practice, differs as an end result. > > It's a useful tool which gets the job done. You sign up, and create a board without even thinking about the functions. It's that easy. Especially after they updated the interface. Keep in mind the tool is more in the freeform category - you can place anything anywhere in a grid - it won't require you to put specific things in specific slots. The drawback of it is that while it is comfortable, it can't fully integrate with task/issue tracking tools. ----- ページ：1 / 8\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/176690/cardboard?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/176690/cardboard) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## 構造化データ