--- description: Bryntumを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Bryntumとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [ガントチャートツール](/directory/31582/gantt-chart/software) > [Bryntum](/software/176261/bryntum) # Bryntum Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/176261/bryntum ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/176261/bryntum?page=2) > あらゆるWebアプリケーションでプロジェクトを簡単に管理できるようにする優れたJavaScriptベースのガント・チャート・コンポーネント。 > > 評価：25人のユーザーによる評価は**4.8/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Bryntumの対象ユーザー エンタープライズ・ソフトウェア・ベンダー、 SaaSプロジェクト管理アプリケーション、 製造実行システム (MES) アプリ。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.8/5** | 25 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.5/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.8/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Bryntum - **設立**: 2009 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $950.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース - **サポートされる言語**: オランダ語, スウェーデン語, ロシア語, 日本語, 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アメリカ合衆国, イギリス, インド, オーストラリア, カナダ, スウェーデン, ドイツ, ブラジル, メキシコ, 中国, 日本 ## 機能 - API - Third-Party Integrations - イベント管理 - オンライン予約 - カラーコード、カラーアイコン - カレンダー管理 - カンバンボード - ガントチャート、タイムラインビュー - キャパシティ管理 - グラフィカル・ユーザーインタフェース - コラボレーションツール - スケジューリング - セルフサービスポータル - タスク・スケジューリング - タスク管理 - テンプレート - ドラッグ・アンド・ドロップ - プロジェクト管理 - プロジェクト計画 - マイルストーン追跡 - リアルタイム・スケジューリング - リソース・スケジューリング - リソース管理 - ワークフロー管理 - 予約管理 - 依存関係追跡 - 優先順位付け - 可用性管理 ## 統合 (合計1件) - Microsoft Excel ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - 電話サポート ## Category - [ガントチャートツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31582/gantt-chart/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [ガントチャートツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31582/gantt-chart/software) - [リソース管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30859/resource-management/software) - [カンバンツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31580/kanban-tools/software) - [カレンダーツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/32297/calendar/software) - [アプリ開発ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Google Calendar](https://www.capterra.jp/software/213340/google-calendar) — 4.8/5 (4022 reviews) 2. [Connecteam](https://www.capterra.jp/software/153140/connecteam) — 4.6/5 (5059 reviews) 3. [Google Workspace](https://www.capterra.jp/software/168389/google-workspace) — 4.7/5 (17484 reviews) 4. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.jp/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2887 reviews) 5. [Calendly](https://www.capterra.jp/software/148036/calendly) — 4.7/5 (4084 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Excellent UI Components with Great Documentation and Support" — 5.0/5 > **Thomas** | *2025年8月11日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Bryntum is very easy to implement, well-documented, and offers many well-thought-out features that integrate seamlessly. Good structure of code. Support via the forum works very well in most cases and provides helpful answers. We are using Scheduler Pro / Calendar and the Grid. > > **改善点**: Upgrading to new versions can sometimes be a bit more involved, but in most cases, it works without major issues. > > Overall, an excellent experience – Bryntum has significantly accelerated our development and improved the quality of our application. The combination of great documentation, solid architecture, and reliable support makes it a clear recommendation. ----- ### "Flexible, high-quality OEM components with excellent partnership support" — 5.0/5 > **John** | *2025年10月24日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The Bryntum team has been excellent to work with. They were highly flexible during our contracting process, allowing us to customize how we structured our license agreements and bundle multiple components rather than being limited to individual list-price items. This flexibility made the partnership feel very collaborative. From a technical standpoint, the first product we’ve implemented has been extremely customizable and aligned well with our product’s look and feel—exactly what we want from OEM software. It met nearly all of our functional requirements and was straightforward to adapt into our existing environment. > > **改善点**: Our engineering team noted that the documentation could be more extensive to support deeper self-service and faster onboarding. While this wasn’t a blocker, having more examples and usage details would be helpful. That said, the Bryntum team was very accessible and quick to respond to our questions, which helped offset the documentation gaps during our initial implementation. > > Our overall experience has been very positive. We were able to get our component built, integrated, and deployed quickly, and the support we received from the Bryntum team was excellent throughout. They were responsive, accommodating, and clearly invested in helping us succeed. The software itself performed as expected, was highly adaptable, and integrated smoothly with our product. We’re looking forward to expanding our use of Bryntum components in future iterations. ----- ### "Great tool - very bad use/pricing model for internal company use" — 5.0/5 > **Craig** | *2022年4月8日* | 航空会社/航空産業 | おすすめ評価：0.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Ease of use (both from a development and end-user perspective) > > **改善点**: No true pricing model for internal company use. > > Seemed good at first (tech support, sales), however - once we purchased the recommended license (i.e. license recommended at the outset of our testing period), the sales person insisted we needed to purchase the license that was 3x more expensive. This would have eliminated the tool as a viable solution - so we have wasted several months and lots of developer time getting their tool integrated. ----- ### "A powerful, high-performance Gantt chart" — 5.0/5 > **Hank** | *2025年12月23日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Honestly, it’s super fast. Even when we’re dealing with thousands of tasks, the scrolling and dragging still very smooth. Also, it’s flexible so we could customize to make it works perfectly with our AI production scheduling applications for SME manufacturers. > > **改善点**: The biggest challenge is the learning curve. It has several modules that take some time to figure out how everything works. It’s also not the cheapest option but we think it’s worth the investment. > > Bryntum makes our SARA AI production scheduling system look professional and easy to use. It turns complex data into something our users can easily understand. It’s helped us deliver a top-tier experience to our customers. ----- ### "Bryntum Gantt + Scheduler Pro, great tools for demanding clients" — 5.0/5 > **Hrvoje** | *2024年10月9日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Performant. Rich set of features especially resource management. Flexible. Visually pleasing. > > **改善点**: At the moment we have no issues at all. > > We started application development with another component that did not fully meet the needs of our clients, as it has some limitations in performance and scalability. Change was needed and Bryntum Gantt + Scheduler Pro came just in time to quickly replace initial component. What we got with Bryntum Gantt and Scheduler Pro are robust, high performant components that offer a clear visual representation of tasks, dependencies, and timelines together with insights into resource availability and workload. Both components, with their rich set of features are significantly improving and accelerating our development process. ----- ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/176261/bryntum?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/176261/bryntum) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## 構造化データ