--- description: Kickbox Email Verificationを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Kickbox Email Verificationとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [メール配信システム](/directory/30013/email-marketing/software) > [Kickbox Email Verification](/software/175436/kickbox) # Kickbox Email Verification Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/175436/kickbox ページ：1 / 4\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/175436/kickbox?page=2) > メール・アドレスの性質 (配信可能、配信不能、すべて受け入れ、破棄、および役割) をリスト内で識別することや、キャプチャ時にリアルタイムで識別することが可能。 > > 評価：70人のユーザーによる評価は**4.4/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.4/5** | 70 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 80% | (8/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Kickbox - **ロケーション**: Dallas, アメリカ ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $5.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アイルランド, アゼルバイジャン, アフガニスタン, アメリカ合衆国, アラブ首長国連邦, アルジェリア, アルゼンチン, アルバ, アルバニア, アルメニア, アンギラ, アンゴラ, アンティグア・バーブーダ, アンドラ, イエメン, イギリス, イスラエル, イタリア, イラク さらに209件 ## 機能 - イベントによるアクション - キャッチ・オール・サーバ検出 - キャンペーン分析 - シンタックス・チェック - ドメイン確認 - メール管理 - メール追跡 - レポート／分析 - 使い捨てメールアドレス検知 ## 統合 (合計25件) - AWeber - Act-On - ActiveCampaign - BenchmarkONE - Campaign Monitor by Marigold - Cordial - Dotdigital - Drip - Emarsys - GetResponse - Google Sheets - HubSpot Marketing Hub - Intercom - Iterable - Klaviyo ... さらに10件の統合 ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート - チャット対応有 ## Category - [メール配信システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30013/email-marketing/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [メール配信システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30013/email-marketing/software) - [メール検証ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31341/email-verification-tools/software) - [メールトラッキングツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31325/email-tracking/software) ## 代替製品 1. [ZeroBounce](https://www.capterra.jp/software/169340/zerobounce) — 4.8/5 (580 reviews) 2. [Bouncer](https://www.capterra.jp/software/178464/bouncer) — 4.9/5 (318 reviews) 3. [Reoon Email Verifier](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1033680/reoon-email-verifier) — 4.9/5 (198 reviews) 4. [SendGrid](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1004681/sendgrid) — 4.2/5 (753 reviews) 5. [Selzy](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1032858/selzy) — 4.8/5 (116 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Amazing tool to validate your Accounts/Leads Emails" — 5.0/5 > **Arman** | *2021年5月4日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I have been using Kickbox from last 6 months and this is one of the best tools which I have used so far to validate the emails of the leads and previous accounts/business data. Previously I have been using sales navigator which was a kind of manual process however it automated my email verification and made the things easier for me and my team members. I was also able to integrate it with my campaign tools and team was very supportive within this process now. > > **改善点**: To be very frank on this part, I personally did not face any issues while using this. However few of my team members found that the pricing part could be relaxed a bit as the platform grows up as it will help startups to go for. > > With the use of Kickbox, now I and my complete team is able to validate all of email addresses before sending final mail to the customers. Somewhere it is saving us to get spammed and blocked on other campaigns platforms. This is a kind of toll which we have been searching and finally we are satisfied with it. ----- ### "Kickbox has been a fantastic tool for us" — 5.0/5 > **Steve** | *2021年6月29日* | 政府機関 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: It was incredibly easy to use, the functions were obvious and loading my file took only a minute. The great part is how fast the tool works, even when I upload a large list it takes only minutes for the list to be verified. Also, the quality of results is better than other tools that i have used. > > **改善点**: there were very few cons about the software, I've used 3 or 4 services prior to this and so far this has been the best performing of the tools I used. > > Kickbox took me only minutes to set up and get my first list on through. Compared to other tools it was much easier to set up. Also, other tools for email verification would get me bad bounce rates of up to 10% even after verifying, kickbox is much more accurate as they've had a bad bounce rate of less than .5 percent after verifying. So it's outperformed other tools I've tried. ----- ### "Overpriced, and not the best for disposable or accept-all" — 3.0/5 > **Diana** | *2024年11月14日* | マーケティング、広告 | おすすめ評価：4.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I like how simple the platform is to use. It's a pure email verification service that doesn't try to feature stuff like Zerobounce and AtData. It's great for beginners who want a no-fuss platform with a simple API. > > **改善点**: It seems to struggle with accurately detecting disposable and accept all emails. For me, that's a deal breaker as someone screening services for clients. It also took quite a long time to clean lists with bad emails inside when compared to other services like Bouncer who is one of the slower ones. Lastly, it's priced quite higher than most email verification services. > > The platform works for cleaning emails, but I'm not wowed by it. I think the UI needs a refresh if they're going to charge the prices they do. That or maybe more dedicated or proactive service. ----- ### "Professional email verification to boost your list health" — 5.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2021年9月3日* | マーケティング、広告 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I like the clean interface for starters. This cloud-based tool is easy to use and all the important info and settings are presented in a clean way. One of the things that I like is that Kickbox gives each lead a score, based on a few criteria. You can also quickly see what your overall list health is. It's good to monitor this regularly. I found Kickbox to be very accurate when I tested a few of my email lists, including a large list with 'old' email addresses. This is one of the leading tools out there. I recommend trying it to see how it compares with the others. > > **改善点**: Pricing structure changed a bit, making it more expensive than before. Still reasonable pricing in my opinion, especially since a healthy email list will give you a good return if you're good at email marketing. That being said, new features were introduced over the years, and that's also included in the new pricing. > > This is one of the leading email verification tools on the market. It's been a rising force so to speak and is one of my favorite tools. I like the modern look and how stable this is. You also get accurate results within reasonable time (I prefer accuracy over speed). It's actually quite fast for the number of checks that are performed. I have recommended Kickbox to business partners before and will continue to do so. You'll also find that there's plenty of information on their site to learn about email verification and email marketing. The knowledge you can gather as a user is something you can use in your business, especially if you're responsible for keeping track of the email marketing performance (and risks). ----- ### "Highly recommended" — 5.0/5 > **James** | *2021年6月25日* | 情報サービス | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Provides more than just a yes/no response Is pretty quick I prefer the credit approach vs paying individually after each batc > > **改善点**: There is nothing fundamentally lacking in this tool. It does the job I need to do it. > > I began looking for a new tool after our previous tool did something I considered dishonest/underhanded. I was introduced to people who worked there and they gave me 1,000 free credits. I used those credits to test 1,000 records through Kickbox (A) vs 1,000 records through our existing vendor (B). I took the results from our existing vendor, suppressed the ones they said were bad and sent the rest. After the send, I looked at: - records (B) had said were OK but actually did bounce - records (B) had said were not OK but (A) said were OK Many of the records (B) said were OK but did bounce were marked as NOT OK by (A), to a statistically significant variance. I did not test records that (B) had said were not OK but (A) said were OK, but I felt like I had been leaving money on the table. With any of these tools, there is always a margin of "unknown" - they can't predict if it's going to be good or not. Kickbox will do a little more with examining addresses \[SENSITIVE CONTENT\] to try to estimate the quality (called a SendEx Score) and will also return columns for "Free" and "Disposable" or "Role" addresses. Kickbox will not charge you for ones it can't predict. The other vendor did charge. Kickbox also charged on a sliding scale - the more credits you bought up front, the cheaper they were, compared to the other vendor always having a set amount. Kickbox's API also returns that same larger dataset, compared to the competitor's "yes/no" response. ----- ページ：1 / 4\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/175436/kickbox?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/175436/kickbox) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## 構造化データ