キャプテラ - 日本企業の最適な
ソフトウェア選びをサポートし18年
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
ManageEngine Endpoint Centralとは？
Desktop Centralは、サーバ、ノートパソコン、デスクトップ、スマートフォン、タブレットの一元管理に役立つ統合エンドポイント管理ソリューションです。オンプレミスまたはクラウドベースの統合エンドポイント管理 (UEM) を使用すると、パッチのインストール、ソフトウェアの導入、OSイメージングの導入、モバイルおよびBring Your Own Device (BYOD) デバイスの管理、リモート・トラブルシューティング、最新管理など、定期的なエンドポイント管理ルーチンを自動化することができます。また、時間と場所に制限されることなくエンドポイントを管理できるモバイル・アプリも搭載しています。
ManageEngine Endpoint Centralの対象ユーザー
あらゆる企業。
ManageEngine Endpoint Centralをご存知でしょうか？
別の人気製品との比較
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
ManageEngine Endpoint Centralの他のおすすめ代替製品
ManageEngine Endpoint Centralの評判・レビュー
検討した類似製品：
Great Patching Tool
製品を使ってみた感想： The product has consistently proven to be reliable, offering an array of features that become even more valuable with deeper exploration. In the three years I've used this product, it has delivered 100% performance without fail, every single day.
良いポイント:
Platform is user friendly, easy to navigate and makes patching Fun.
改善してほしい点:
Unable to Deploy Windows Feature Versions without ISOs
検討した類似製品：
Unified Endpoint Management Solution
製品を使ってみた感想： Endpoint Central is a powerful tool for IT administrators looking to streamline endpoint management and enhance security across the organization. I appreciate the wide range of features that cover almost all aspect of the endpoint management including patch management, software deployment, asset management, remote control and mobile device management.
良いポイント:
Endpoint Central allows us to manage servers, laptops, desktops, smartphones and tablets from a single console which is highly efficient for organizations with diverse device ecosystems. Endpoint Central offers platforms for managing legacy and modern devices.
改善してほしい点:
Due to macOS's high level of security, Endpoint Central is not entirely capable of managing MacBook Pro and iMac devices. Lack of historical reports that provide information about configurations that we have defined and deployed to the devices via Endpoint Central.
Updated Review after 7 mo We won’t renew annual subscription
製品を使ってみた感想：
Not extremely pleased with Endpoint Central Cloud UEM. For what we ultimately use in the suite we could’ve saved money and used either a different ManageEngine / ZoHo product or a different software altogether.
I’m not meaning to sound so hard on them, but I’m just not happy with what we got for the cost. We won’t be renewing the annual subscription.
良いポイント:
Documentation is very helpful, customer service is generally very good and prompt at answering. There are a lot of included features in endpoint central uem edition (we used endpoint central uem cloud). Windows OS features work often. Remote access feature is good. Patch management works.
改善してほしい点:
Limited features for MacOS and extremely few for Linux although some problems may be limited by the OS. Enrollment was a pain for Mac and Linux and provided few benefits. (No MdM for Linux. MDM required and included for macOS, but provided few benefits.) Advertising on the ManageEngine website and Endpoint Central website promised way more than it delivers. Especially for multi OS features. Very windows-centric.
Manager Engine Endpoint Central
製品を使ってみた感想： Overall I am happy with the product because OS Deployer works great.
良いポイント:
We mainly use it for patch management and OS Deployment.
改善してほしい点:
Patching process can be a bit flaky sometimes and hard to know why it failed on a certain computer
Solid Endpoint Management platform
製品を使ってみた感想： So far, so good. Be very careful to enable tampering protection on agents, because if anything goes south with the server and you are not able to restart from a backup, you will have to engage with the support in order to correctly register agents.
良いポイント:
Its extensive range of features, which may also be confusing at first, but definitely a plus when it comes to a fully-integrated solution. It's apowerful tool for inventoring, patching, deploying software, and includes remote control features to support users. Cheaper than Intune which in turn requires the expensive Premium license.
改善してほしい点:
Probably the flaky Mac and Linux integration. Could not get patching to work with these OSes, and given the large number of Linux servers on my network, this is less than ideal.
