--- description: InsightVMを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: InsightVMとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [脆弱性管理ツール](/directory/31062/vulnerability-management/software) > [InsightVM](/software/169723/insightvm) # InsightVM Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/169723/insightvm ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/169723/insightvm?page=2) > データ収集、優先順位付け、改善報告などを通じて、企業によるリスク査定を支援する脆弱性管理ツール。 > > 評価：18人のユーザーによる評価は**4.3/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### InsightVMの対象ユーザー 仮想インフラの評価、ライブダッシュボード、改善レポート、リスクの優先順位付け、脅威フィードなどを使用して、セキュリティチームを支援するクラウドベースの脆弱性管理ソリューション。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.3/5** | 18 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 3.8/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 3.7/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 3.9/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 80% | (8/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Rapid7 - **ロケーション**: Boston, アメリカ - **設立**: 2000 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格モデル**: (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アメリカ合衆国 ## 機能 - パッチ管理 - ポリシー管理 - リスク・マネジメント - 脆弱性評価 - 資産発見 ## サポートのオプション - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [脆弱性管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31062/vulnerability-management/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Action1](https://www.capterra.jp/software/180609/action1-rmm) — 4.9/5 (237 reviews) 2. [ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus](https://www.capterra.jp/software/185510/manageengine-vulnerability-manager-plus) — 4.6/5 (32 reviews) 3. [Orca Security](https://www.capterra.jp/software/188445/orca-security) — 4.8/5 (60 reviews) 4. [Heimdal Patch & Asset Management](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1013928/heimdal-patch--asset-management) — 4.7/5 (63 reviews) 5. [vRx](https://www.capterra.jp/software/201047/topia) — 4.9/5 (22 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Manage your Vulnerabilities better using InsightVM" — 4.0/5 > **Gaurav** | *2024年7月12日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Console, ease of setup , ease of policy creation , scanner configurations. > > **改善点**: Reporting , Sometimes latency in scanning but thats due to your network congestion. > > Awesome . Superb product. Lots of capabilities ----- ### "InsightVM review - Analyst perspective" — 5.0/5 > **Suchibrato** | *2020年10月8日* | 半導体 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The tool is relatively easy to pickup, is feature-rich and is a leader in its category. > > **改善点**: Scan templates creation and management is a bit difficult for first time users. Interface isnt that user-friendly. ----- ### "Bloated NMAP scanner" — 1.0/5 > **Ron** | *2017年1月26日* | おすすめ評価：0.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Absolutely nothing at this point. > > **改善点**: Doesn't work. Tech support horrible. Accessing logs horrible. Just overall terrible software. > > 1\. Tech support is awful. Just god awful. I installed their appliance OVF's. They also have direct Linux and Windows installers if you prefer to load your own OVF's. Every single case I submit, I say I am running the Nexpose Appliance. Every single time they ask me what I am running (Windows or Linux). Are they just that dumb over there? 2. Scans die. I did my initial discovery scans. Worked OK at most sites except a couple which kept dying. I ran them a couple times and they finally finished. I didn't bother calling support. See \#1 above for why. I then tried to run initial Full Audit scans. Only one of my 8 sites completed. I can't wait to call tech support to find out\!\! LOL This is not a cheap product. It works so poorly that it is quite disgusting. It is VERY obvious that the internal processes at Rapid7 are horrible at best. I'm going to ask for my money back and go with another product. Note: Too bad I couldn't demo this product firsthand (try before you buy) but Rapid7 is very inflexible in that manner. ----- ### "One of th best VM tools in the market" — 4.0/5 > **Tushar** | *2023年1月13日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: InsightVM has good asset discover and management modules along with vulnerability scanning , management, exception modules and integration with different ticketing tools make it one of the best tools for VM. > > **改善点**: Reporting features needs to be improved along with the removal of false positives. For Cisco devices, we faced a long line of false positives which even when contacted support team was not fixed. ----- ### "Excellent product by an excellent company" — 5.0/5 > **Simon** | *2019年3月22日* | 金融サービス | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Easy to install, intuitive UI, integration with cloud portal, agent (that feeds data to the cloud analytics portal), multi-platform. > > **改善点**: Nothing -- Rapid7 is KILLING it. Since this field has a minimum length: maybe the only downside is that the security console requires a decent bit of RAM? I had to give it 8 GB to ensure stability. That said, it's running a web-based management interface, and the scan runtime is far faster and more reliable than our previous solution. > > I trialed Nexpose Community when our company started moving to a cloud hosting provider. I was very impressed. We ended up going with another provider, but when that contract expired, I proposed that we give InsightVM a shot instead of a renewal, remembering how much of a pleasure it was to use. Now, we're customers, and I don't regret my suggestion at all. I deployed a security console within an hour, and had it ingesting an inventory of every host in our cloud environment, whether Active Directory knew about it or not. Everyone from Compliance to IT speaks positively about it. They like the intuitive UI, the ability to get actionable data the moment the dashboard loads, and the fact that it's fully aware of both Microsoft and third-party vulnerabilities. I like the "risk score," a practical alternative to the typical CVSS rating. While the CVSS score is important, Rapid7 weights their score on factors such as practicality of exploitation and active targeting in the wild. I've suggested that we prioritize remediation based on the Rapid7 risk score rather than the CVSS score. I installed the Insight agent on a majority of our workstations, which sends data about any published vulnerability to the portal, whether in a Docker image, a third-party application, or the underlying OS. A couple customizations of the dashboard, and now we see comprehensive overview of the week's priorities at logon. It's great to have one dashboard for every environment\! ----- ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/169723/insightvm?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/169723/insightvm) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | ja | | ----- ## 構造化データ