--- description: Microsoft Azureを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Microsoft Azureとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [アプリ開発ツール](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [Microsoft Azure](/software/16365/azure) # Microsoft Azure Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/16365/azure ページ：1 / 80\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/16365/azure?page=2) > 仮想マシン (VM) 作成、Webベースのアプリケーションの構築と実行、スマート・クライアント・アプリケーション、XML Webサービスのためのクラウド・コンピューティング・プラットフォームです。 > > 評価：1962人のユーザーによる評価は**4.6/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Microsoft Azureの対象ユーザー クラウドが実現した成果には、大小、新旧を問わず、あらゆる企業や組織がアクセス可能であるべきです。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.6/5** | 1962 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 80% | (8/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Microsoft - **ロケーション**: Redmond, アメリカ - **設立**: 1975 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $31.39 - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Windows（デスクトップ）, Linux（デスクトップ）, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: イタリア語, オランダ語, スウェーデン語, スペイン語, デンマーク語, トルコ語, ドイツ語, フランス語, ポルトガル語, ポーランド語, ロシア語, 中国語, 英語, 韓国語 - **利用可能な国**: アメリカ合衆国, イギリス, インド, オーストラリア, カナダ, ドイツ, 中国, 日本 ## 機能 - API - APIライフサイクル管理 - API設計 - BYOL管理 - Scalability - Third-Party Integrations - アクセス制御・許可 - グラフィカル・ユーザーインタフェース - コラボレーションツール - サービス水準合意 (SLA) 管理 - ダッシュボード - テスト管理 - デスクトップ仮想化 - デバイス管理 - デバッグ - デプロイ管理 - データセキュリティ - データ移行 - ネットワーク・モニタリング - バックアップ、修復 - パフォーマンス・モニタリング - ポリシー管理 - ユーザー・プロビジョニング - リモートアクセス／コントロール - レポート／分析 - ログアクセス - 互換性テスト - 仮想サーバ - 仮想マシン・モニタリング - 多要素認証 - 応募管理 - 統合型開発環境 - 設定の管理 - 負荷分散 ## 統合 (合計6件) - Citrix Workspace - GitHub - Microsoft 365 - Nerdio - Retrace by Netreo - Visual Studio Code ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [アプリ開発ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [アプリ開発ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [API管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31065/api-management/software) - [仮想マシンソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31078/virtual-machine/software) - [仮想デスクトップソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31996/vdi/software) - [IaaSソリューション](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/32015/infrastructure-as-a-service-solutions/software) ## 代替製品 1. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.jp/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6187 reviews) 2. [Essential Studio](https://www.capterra.jp/software/32602/essential-studio) — 4.5/5 (935 reviews) 3. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.capterra.jp/software/101288/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3007 reviews) 4. [Jira](https://www.capterra.jp/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15417 reviews) 5. [IntelliJ IDEA](https://www.capterra.jp/software/136010/intellij-idea) — 4.7/5 (1259 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Great Product for Enterprise Environments" — 5.0/5 > **Clyde** | *2026年5月19日* | 食品、飲料 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Microsoft Azure gives us the ability to manage devices (corporate or BYOD), utilize Conditional Access Policies, and also provide other security measures in order to provide and sustain a stable work and network environment. > > **改善点**: Microsoft Azure can be slow to provide certain information or details in real time. The reporting for devices and apps takes quite some time to provide info such as the sync time for a device and also if a Conditional Access Policy was successfully added to the device. > > I use Microsoft Azure daily to provide administrative tasks, monitor and configure Conditional Access Policies, monitor firewall rules Risky Users report. Overall, it provides a great service and value. ----- ### "Title: Powerful platform, but plan for a real learning curve" — 4.0/5 > **Blake** | *2026年6月9日* | 小売 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure Active Directory has been the biggest win for us. Managing user identities, conditional access policies, and device enrollment all from one portal has made life a lot easier from an IT standpoint. Once everything is configured correctly, it's pretty reliable, and having cloud-based identity management means we're not dependent on an on-prem domain controller for everything. For a nonprofit organization, it's been a solid foundation to build our endpoint management on. > > **改善点**: The learning curve is steep and the Azure portal has a habit of moving things around or renaming features without much warning. More than once I've gone looking for something and had to re-learn where it lives. Token caching and SSO behavior on shared workstations has also caused some headaches that took a while to dig into and weren't well documented. Support resources are extensive but actually getting useful help for specific edge case issues can feel like searching for a needle in a haystack. > > ai insights icon chrome icon google docs icon Azure is one of those platforms where the depth of what it can do is both its biggest strength and its biggest challenge. There's almost nothing it can't handle, but getting it configured just right takes real time and patience. For our IT team it's become a core part of how we manage users and devices across the organization, and for the most part it delivers. Just expect to spend some quality time in documentation and community forums before everything clicks. ----- ### "Azure review" — 3.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2026年3月13日* | コンピュータ、ネットワーク・セキュリティ | おすすめ評価：6.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Extremely powerful and flexible cloud platform. Strong security and infrastructure options and scales well for complex or enterprise‑level environments. Integrates well with other Microsoft products. > > **改善点**: Pricing is complex and can escalate quickly, making budgeting difficult. Frequent platform changes increase the administrative burden thus requires significant technical expertise to manage properly. Overkill for organizations that don’t need enterprise‑level cloud services. > > Microsoft Azure is a very powerful cloud platform, but it was more than we needed and became difficult and expensive to manage over time. We ultimately moved off Azure to a private hosting cloud solution because costs were hard to predict and the platform changed frequently, making administration challenging. ----- ### "A natural cloud extension to the Microsoft stack" — 4.0/5 > **connor** | *2026年4月16日* | メディア制作 | おすすめ評価：6.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Azure fits comfortably into environments that are already ebedded into the Microsoft ecosystem, with Active Directory etc - especially through Entra and hybrid setups. It allows easier extension to existing authentication and permissions, and policies can be remodeled into the cloud rather than recreating entirely from scratch. As a cloud provider it is quite mature and broad, so once the foundations are in place it can cover the vast majority of infrastructure needs within their ecosystem. > > **改善点**: Azure can often feel like an extension of the on-premise microsoft stack rather than a standalone addition, which in some cases is good but in others restrictive. If you are used to ADDS on-prem, many features and interactions will feel familiar, but added cloud services and policy layers, joined with pricing models, can add a lot of extra complexity. > > Overall, Azure is at its strongest when integrated alongside existing Microsoft infrastructure. Its similarities to Active Directory provide a real advantage for organisations that already leverage or are familiar with microsoft tools, helping to soften any move towards cloud operations. With that in mind however, as with all of the major cloud providers, its ecosystem is vast and easy to mismanage if you don't keep a strict eye on resource cost and configurations. ----- ### "Our Real-World Experience Running a Charity CRM on Azure" — 5.0/5 > **Mark** | *2026年6月6日* | 美術館、博物館 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: We use it for our charity's CRM as it gives us enterprise-level cloud infrastructure, reliability and scalability, plus we get charity pricing and credits that make technology we'd normally never be able to afford for a 100% non-profit organisation like ours. > > **改善点**: We were nearly caught out by the costs escalating too quickly, even with the charity discounts we had from MS, when we started adding services we thought we needed\! With its complexity, If not carefully managed, it means smaller charities can need more technical IT knowledge and ongoing administration than originally expected, which we did, so we needed our IT volunteers and the CRM programmers to put their heads together and optimise for what we actually needed. > > We were nearly caught out by the costs escalating too quickly, even with the charity discounts from MS, when we started adding services we thought we needed\! With its complexity, if not carefully managed, smaller charities can need more technical IT knowledge and ongoing administration than originally expected, which we did, so we needed our IT volunteers and the CRM programmers to put their heads together and optimise for what we actually required in the real world. ----- ページ：1 / 80\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/16365/azure?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/16365/azure) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## 構造化データ