--- description: Microsoft Azureを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Microsoft Azureとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [アプリ開発ツール](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [Microsoft Azure](/software/16365/azure) # Microsoft Azure Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/16365/azure ページ：1 / 79\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/16365/azure?page=2) > 仮想マシン (VM) 作成、Webベースのアプリケーションの構築と実行、スマート・クライアント・アプリケーション、XML Webサービスのためのクラウド・コンピューティング・プラットフォームです。 > > 評価：1955人のユーザーによる評価は**4.6/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Microsoft Azureの対象ユーザー クラウドが実現した成果には、大小、新旧を問わず、あらゆる企業や組織がアクセス可能であるべきです。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.6/5** | 1955 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 80% | (8/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Microsoft - **ロケーション**: Redmond, アメリカ - **設立**: 1975 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $31.39 - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Windows（デスクトップ）, Linux（デスクトップ）, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: イタリア語, オランダ語, スウェーデン語, スペイン語, デンマーク語, トルコ語, ドイツ語, フランス語, ポルトガル語, ポーランド語, ロシア語, 中国語, 英語, 韓国語 - **利用可能な国**: アメリカ合衆国, イギリス, インド, オーストラリア, カナダ, ドイツ, 中国, 日本 ## 機能 - API - APIライフサイクル管理 - API設計 - BYOL管理 - Scalability - Third-Party Integrations - アクセス制御・許可 - グラフィカル・ユーザーインタフェース - コラボレーションツール - サービス水準合意 (SLA) 管理 - ダッシュボード - テスト管理 - デスクトップ仮想化 - デバイス管理 - デバッグ - デプロイ管理 - データセキュリティ - データ移行 - ネットワーク・モニタリング - バックアップ、修復 - パフォーマンス・モニタリング - ポリシー管理 - ユーザー・プロビジョニング - リモートアクセス／コントロール - レポート／分析 - ログアクセス - 互換性テスト - 仮想サーバ - 仮想マシン・モニタリング - 多要素認証 - 応募管理 - 統合型開発環境 - 設定の管理 - 負荷分散 ## 統合 (合計6件) - Citrix Workspace - GitHub - Microsoft 365 - Nerdio - Retrace by Netreo - Visual Studio Code ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [アプリ開発ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [アプリ開発ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [API管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31065/api-management/software) - [仮想マシンソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31078/virtual-machine/software) - [仮想デスクトップソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31996/vdi/software) - [IaaSソリューション](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/32015/infrastructure-as-a-service-solutions/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Essential Studio](https://www.capterra.jp/software/32602/essential-studio) — 4.5/5 (924 reviews) 2. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.jp/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6170 reviews) 3. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.capterra.jp/software/101288/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3006 reviews) 4. [Jira](https://www.capterra.jp/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15367 reviews) 5. [IntelliJ IDEA](https://www.capterra.jp/software/136010/intellij-idea) — 4.7/5 (1257 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Powerful cloud platform but a bit complex to learn" — 4.0/5 > **Harshul** | *2026年4月15日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: What I like most about Azure is how many services it gives in one place. At work we use it for VMs, storage and some app hosting, and it’s pretty reliable once everything is set up right. The dashboard is clean and I can find most things without digging too much. Scaling resources is easy, I can bump things up or down without restarting whole systems. The monitoring tools help a lot when something is acting weird. I also like that it connects well with other Microsoft tools we already use, so it fits into our workflow without extra steps. > > **改善点**: Some parts of Azure feel confusing, especially when you’re trying to set up something new. There are too many menus and sometimes I forget where a setting is. Pricing can get tricky too, because small things add up fast if you don’t watch usage. A few times deployments failed for no clear reason and I had to redo them. Debugging errors isn’t always straightforward, the messages can be vague. Also the portal can be slow at times, especially when switching between services. > > Overall my experience with Azure has been good for day‑to‑day work. We use it for hosting apps, running VMs and storing data, and it handles most tasks without issues. Once things are configured properly it runs stable, but the setup part can take time and patience. I like the flexibility and the amount of tools available, but sometimes it feels like too much to learn at once. Still, it saves us time compared to managing everything on‑prem. For cloud work it’s been reliable and gets the job done. ----- ### "A natural cloud extension to the Microsoft stack" — 4.0/5 > **connor** | *2026年4月16日* | メディア制作 | おすすめ評価：6.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Azure fits comfortably into environments that are already ebedded into the Microsoft ecosystem, with Active Directory etc - especially through Entra and hybrid setups. It allows easier extension to existing authentication and permissions, and policies can be remodeled into the cloud rather than recreating entirely from scratch. As a cloud provider it is quite mature and broad, so once the foundations are in place it can cover the vast majority of infrastructure needs within their ecosystem. > > **改善点**: Azure can often feel like an extension of the on-premise microsoft stack rather than a standalone addition, which in some cases is good but in others restrictive. If you are used to ADDS on-prem, many features and interactions will feel familiar, but added cloud services and policy layers, joined with pricing models, can add a lot of extra complexity. > > Overall, Azure is at its strongest when integrated alongside existing Microsoft infrastructure. Its similarities to Active Directory provide a real advantage for organisations that already leverage or are familiar with microsoft tools, helping to soften any move towards cloud operations. With that in mind however, as with all of the major cloud providers, its ecosystem is vast and easy to mismanage if you don't keep a strict eye on resource cost and configurations. ----- ### "Wasn’t able to use it to its fullest." — 3.0/5 > **Teresa** | *2026年3月26日* | 建設 | おすすめ評価：7.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I really like the idea of Microsoft Azzure and that it would work with all My Microsoft products that we use in the business. > > **改善点**: It was difficult to learn how to use and with little extra time in a busy business I didn’t have the opportunity to work with it to the best of its ability. > > After making attempts of trying to learn the program to see if it was a good fit for the company I decided it wasn’t for us. ----- ### "Azure - Engi" — 5.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2026年4月17日* | コンピュータ、ネットワーク・セキュリティ | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I enjoy using Azure to stand up and host infrastructure because it provides a flexible and scalable platform that aligns well with modern cloud design principles. The integration of RBAC with Entra ID makes access control seamless, allowing me to manage permissions in a centralized and secure way. I also appreciate how easy it is to deploy and manage resources using Infrastructure as Code, which helps ensure consistency and repeatability across environments. Overall, Azure simplifies both the deployment and governance of infrastructure, making it a reliable choice for building robust systems. > > **改善点**: While I do occasionally run into bugs or platform quirks, the overall experience and capabilities Azure provides still make it a strong choice for building and managing infrastructure. Microsoft's support can sometimes be slow to resolve issues. This is dependent on your support plan. > > Overall, my experience using Azure to build and host infrastructure has been very positive due to its strong balance of scalability, security, and ease of management. The seamless integration of RBAC with Entra ID simplifies identity and access control, making it easier to enforce least-privilege principles across environments. I’ve found that deploying resources through Infrastructure as Code is straightforward and efficient, which helps streamline workflows and maintain consistency. While there are occasional bugs or unexpected issues, they are typically manageable and outweighed by the platform’s robust capabilities and continuous improvements. ----- ### "Great Product for Enterprise Environments" — 5.0/5 > **Clyde** | *2026年5月19日* | 食品、飲料 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Microsoft Azure gives us the ability to manage devices (corporate or BYOD), utilize Conditional Access Policies, and also provide other security measures in order to provide and sustain a stable work and network environment. > > **改善点**: Microsoft Azure can be slow to provide certain information or details in real time. The reporting for devices and apps takes quite some time to provide info such as the sync time for a device and also if a Conditional Access Policy was successfully added to the device. > > I use Microsoft Azure daily to provide administrative tasks, monitor and configure Conditional Access Policies, monitor firewall rules Risky Users report. Overall, it provides a great service and value. ----- ページ：1 / 79\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/16365/azure?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/16365/azure) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## 構造化データ