--- description: Cove Data Protectionを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Cove Data Protectionとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [BCP作成支援ツール](/directory/30206/business-continuity/software) > [Cove Data Protection](/software/163343/backup-and-recovery) # Cove Data Protection Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/163343/backup-and-recovery ページ：1 / 16\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/163343/backup-and-recovery?page=2) > N-able Backupは、従来のイメージ・バックアップのコストと複雑さを伴わない、クラウド・ファーストのデータ保護を提供します。 > > 評価：375人のユーザーによる評価は**4.6/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Cove Data Protectionの対象ユーザー 使いやすく、手頃な価格で、多様な環境に対応するクラウド・ファースト型データ保護と復旧を必要とする、マネージド・サービス・プロバイダーや社内のITチームに最適です。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.6/5** | 375 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.7/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.5/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: N-able ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格モデル**: (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ）, Linux（デスクトップ） - **サポートされる言語**: イタリア語, スペイン語, ドイツ語, ポルトガル語, 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイルランド, アメリカ合衆国, アルゼンチン, アンティグア・バーブーダ, イギリス, イタリア, インド, エストニア, オランダ, オーストラリア, オーストリア, カナダ, グリーンランド, コスタリカ, シンガポール, スイス, スウェーデン, スペイン, チェコ, デンマーク さらに24件 ## 機能 - Data Retention Management - Real-Time Monitoring - アクセス制御・許可 - アラート／通知 - クラウド・バックアップ - コンプライアンス管理 - サーバモニタリング - スケジューリング - セキュア・データストレージ - セルフサービスポータル - ダッシュボード - データストレージ管理 - データ同期 - データ複製 - ドキュメント・ストレージ - バックアップ、修復 - バックアップ・スケジューリング - バックアップ・ログ - バージョン管理 - パッチ管理 - パフォーマンス・モニタリング - パフォーマンス測定基準 - ベアメタル回復 - マルチメディア・アーカイブ - リモートでのモニタリングと管理 - レポートと統計 - レポート／分析 - 仮想マシン・バックアップ - 圧縮 - 増分バックアップ - 暗号化 - 検索／フィルター - 災害復興 - 継続的バックアップ - 自動バックアップ - 複数データソース - 複製 - 課題管理 ## 統合 (合計7件) - Bocada - Gradient - Liongard - MSP Manager - N-central - N-sight RMM - ScalePad Backup Radar ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [BCP作成支援ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30206/business-continuity/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [BCP作成支援ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30206/business-continuity/software) - [データセンター管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10054/data-center-management/software) - [アーカイブソフトウェア](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30998/archiving/software) - [バックアップソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31076/backup/software) - [サーバーバックアップソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31098/server-backup/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Atera](https://www.capterra.jp/software/144309/atera) — 4.5/5 (449 reviews) 2. [Comet Backup](https://www.capterra.jp/software/162943/comet-backup) — 4.7/5 (74 reviews) 3. [MSP360 Backup](https://www.capterra.jp/software/143536/msp360-managed-backup) — 4.6/5 (249 reviews) 4. [ManageEngine OpManager MSP](https://www.capterra.jp/software/212602/manageengine-opmanager-msp) — 4.4/5 (73 reviews) 5. [NAKIVO Backup & Replication](https://www.capterra.jp/software/161328/nakivo) — 4.8/5 (461 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Simple, reliable backup tool that just works" — 5.0/5 > **Alex** | *2026年5月4日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Cove is very easy to navigate, plenty of information available to troubleshoot, or just check the health of backups. It's always been extremely reliable for any customers we use it with, and easy to restore when needed. > > **改善点**: For some of our larger clients, we like to be able to spin up VMs of backups to shorten downtime. Cove does have this capability, but it relies on a Hyper-V or ESXi host on-premise. With our setups, we ideally want to have a separate physical host for backups, and doing this requires some extra licensing compared to other backup solutions with appliances (usually using Linux to virtualize) > > Overall, it's a great product. We've been using it for years, before it was even called Cove. Originally, we had it as integrated backup within our N-Able (then SolarWinds MSP) RMM, but switched over to Cove a few years back. Same technology, but it gave us significantly more reporting options, and made it much easier to verify backups are running across all our clients, without having to go and find each machine in the dashboard. If you're looking for a simple, cloud-native backup that you can easily manage across clients, this is it. ----- ### "Reliable and MSP-Friendly Backup Solution with Strong Day-to-Day Management" — 5.0/5 > **Tara** | *2026年5月6日* | コンピュータ、ネットワーク・セキュリティ | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: What I liked most about Cove Data Protection was how well it fit into an MSP environment while still being simple to manage day to day. The platform made it easy to deploy backups quickly across multiple client environments, monitor backup health centrally, and verify successful backups without adding a lot of administrative overhead. A few areas that stood out to me: The cloud-first architecture simplified deployment and reduced dependency on complex on-prem infrastructure. The management console was straightforward and efficient for monitoring multiple clients at scale. Backup verification and alerting helped ensure backups were actually completing successfully, which is critical in managed services environments. Restore options were flexible, whether restoring a single file, mailbox item, or a full system. It integrated well into operational workflows focused on backup success rates, disaster recovery readiness, and compliance-driven environments. From an MSP operations perspective, reliability and visibility are usually the most important factors, and Cove did a good job balancing both without becoming overly complicated. > > **改善点**: What I liked least about Cove Data Protection was that while the platform is very streamlined, some advanced configuration and reporting capabilities felt limited compared to more enterprise-focused backup platforms. A few areas that could be frustrating at times: Reporting customization could feel restrictive, especially when trying to provide highly tailored executive or compliance reporting to clients. Large-scale restore operations could sometimes be slower than expected depending on bandwidth and recovery scope. Troubleshooting certain failed backups occasionally lacked deep enough error detail, requiring additional support engagement or log review. > > My overall experience with Cove Data Protection was positive, particularly from an MSP operations and client management perspective. The platform was reliable, easy to deploy, and efficient to manage across multiple customer environments. ----- ### "Cove Data Protection Review" — 3.0/5 > **zachary** | *2026年5月6日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：4.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The remote access and backup capabilities are generally reliable and easy to use. It’s convenient to manage backups from a centralized dashboard, and restores are fairly straightforward when needed. The system works well enough for standard backup needs without being overly complex. > > **改善点**: Performance can be inconsistent at times, especially during larger restores or initial backups. The interface feels a bit dated and could be more intuitive. There are also occasional delays in syncing or reporting that can make troubleshooting less efficient. > > Overall, Cove Data Protection provides a solid, functional backup solution that gets the job done. It covers the basics well and is dependable for day-to-day use, but it doesn’t stand out in terms of speed or advanced features. It’s a decent mid-tier product that works adequately for typical business needs. ----- ### "Years of use" — 3.0/5 > **Wayne** | *2026年4月30日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：3.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Ease of integration into the hosted platform for N-Able. It is vert easy to enable it and with some learning, the configurations are quite simplistic. > > **改善点**: Management not getting back to you or responding. I literally have a product I wrote that solves the horrible billing you have and cannot get management to respond to anything. > > It was rocky at first and the technical support agents were severely undertrained, but that has gotten better over the years. ----- ### "System Administrator" — 5.0/5 > **Steve** | *2026年6月9日* | 保険 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Top pro is once the service is deployed and working, it works mostly flawlessly. The web-based management is mostly seamless. > > **改善点**: Main con is there should be additional resilience with the app/service on the machines. Sometimes when there is an error the dashboard should have better clarity on what the error is and if it was catastrophic or not. As we know some errors will not prevent restoration from occurring. Also, needing to access the manager from device or remotely can potentially be an issue. > > Overall experience is good. The support representatives always try with good effort on resolving any issue I have. When not able to resolve they do well on escalating the issue to another tech. ----- ページ：1 / 16\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/163343/backup-and-recovery?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/163343/backup-and-recovery) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## 構造化データ