キャプテラ - 日本企業の最適な
ソフトウェア選びをサポートし18年

IntegrityNextとは?

IntegrityNextを使用すれば、組織は規制要件を満たすために、すべてのサプライヤーについて持続可能性とコンプライアンスを監視することができます。IntegrityNextプラットフォームは、サプライヤーの自己評価と証明書を自動的に取得し、ソーシャル・メディアの不正行為と評判リスクをモニタリングします。IntegrityNextは、贈収賄防止および腐敗防止、環境保護、人権および労働、健康および安全、サイバー・セキュリティ、事業継続性を取り扱っています。

IntegrityNextの対象ユーザー

汚職、制裁、環境保護、健康および安全、人権、労働、紛争鉱物などに関して、サプライチェーンを精査する必要がある小規模、中規模、大規模の組織。

IntegrityNextソフトウェア - 1
IntegrityNextソフトウェア - 2
IntegrityNextソフトウェア - 3

IntegrityNextをご存知でしょうか? 別の人気製品との比較

IntegrityNext

IntegrityNext

4.4 (41)
€9,800.00
無料バージョン
無料トライアル
26
2
4.7 (41)
3.9 (41)
4.5 (41)
VS.
価格プラン
価格オプション
機能
連携サービス
使いやすさ
価格の妥当性
カスタマーサービス
価格情報が見つかりません
無料バージョン
無料トライアル
165
連携サービスが見つかりません
4.4 (22)
4.6 (22)
4.7 (22)
緑色の評価バーは、平均評価とレビュー数に基づいて高評価の製品を表しています。

IntegrityNextの他のおすすめ代替製品

LogicManager
高評価の機能
ダッシュボード
ドキュメント管理
リスク評価
Wrike
高評価の機能
ダッシュボード作成
残業計算
設定可能ワークフロー
Onspring
高評価の機能
コンプライアンス管理
セキュア・データストレージ
リスク評価
A1 Tracker
高評価の機能
Claims Settlement
アラート/通知
請求追跡
VelocityEHS
高評価の機能
アクセス制御・許可
コンプライアンス管理
是正措置・予防措置 (CAPA)
Cority
高評価の機能
OSHA記録保持
ドキュメント管理
ワークフロー管理
HSI Donesafe
高評価の機能
インシデント管理
コースの追跡
コース管理
Centralpoint
高評価の機能
この製品の機能は、まだレビュアーから評価されていません。
Benchmark Gensuite EHS
高評価の機能
OSHA記録保持
インシデント管理
コンプライアンス管理

IntegrityNextの評判・レビュー

評価ポイント

総合評価
4.4
使いやすさ
4.7
カスタマーサービス
4.5
機能
4.1
価格の妥当性
3.9

企業規模(従業員数)別レビュー数

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1,000
  • >1,001

評価別レビュー

5
51%
4
41%
3
5%
1
2%
Lena
Lena
ドイツのDirector Sales and Marketing
認証済みLinkedInユーザー
メディア制作, 501~1,000人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

A very efficient platform for compliance review

5.0 6 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: A successful experience for me as a user - a very good and intuitive functionality which makes the platform easy to use

良いポイント:

It is very simple to use, nice UI, comfortable use

改善してほしい点:

Nothing to complain about, overall satisfied.

Melissa
アメリカのHR Generalist
金融サービス, 11~50人規模の会社
使用期間: 1年以上
投稿経路

Access all company sustainability info in one place

4.0 昨年

製品を使ってみた感想: Seemless!

良いポイント:

Find what you're looking for in seconds. Well categorized. Can easily retreive prior assessments as well to compare & contrast.

改善してほしい点:

Nothing yet, as it has been seemless thus far.

Steffen
ドイツのLegal Compliance Manager
機械・産業工学, 201~500人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

First use due to customer request

3.0 6 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: Another declaration platform in the jungle of information exchange platforms. Another login and account data. Another system, which requires going to your office cabinet to read your hand-written manual ...
For me it is the first contact with this system. We did not buy this software, we are information supplier for FläktGroup in this case.

良いポイント:

Basically it is easy to use. Guiding through the different sections seems to work.

改善してほしい点:

Upload of CMRT form has been refused by the system! No option to get help or information how to solve the problem. I sent the CMRT directly to [email protected] (sender address of the demand for FläktGroup) since there was no instruction what to do in this case. I received no feedback - don't know, if the information has reached the right recipient...

Rowena
ドイツのKey Account & Project Coordinator
電気・電子機器製造, 10,000+人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Fair Portal - Supplier Qualification Program

4.0 4 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: I was impressed about how integrity next handled questions relating to SAQ modules that were now straight forward to answer. They took the matter seriously and discussed it with the contracting customer. Well done. As an admin from the supplier side, this is a much appreciated and needed response.

良いポイント:

Rather than the software, I really appreciate the support provided by the portal provider - this is very untypical, yet highly valuable coming from the supplier side. Some of the questions could not be answered as proposed by the platform, as our products are engineered to order and not catalogue ware. My feedback was taken as an incentive to improve future Supplier Qualification Questionnaires, taking supplier portfolios into account, rather than force suppliers to answer as expected or else be penalized.

改善してほしい点:

The software is not really an issue, as I only worked with the SAQ to date. In general, many SAQ's don't take supplier type, size and complexity into account, or the questions are so general, that a clear answer is not possible (e.g. regarding Conflict of Interests: can we confirm that no family member or close relative of our executive board member is involved in any conflict of interest….for a privately owned customer this would been interviewing cousins, in-laws, partners, children….even parents of executives. This in my opinion is not feasible.

Jonathan
オーストリアのProduct Manager
経営コンサルティング, 11~50人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Easy to use, though the rating logic needs to be improved

4.0 6 年前

良いポイント:

The software is easy to use and comprehensive.

改善してほしい点:

Focus on the rating systems relies heavily on certifications, which are not relevant to all types of businesses. Hence the software is pretty much focused on production suppliers and less on service suppliers. The GDPR and Data Protection rating is nonsense in the way it is implemented as it basically gives a green light for European only data processing and a red light for everything else. This does not reflect by any means what GDPR requires and how a Data Protection analysis is assessed.

Integrity Nextからの返信

6 年前

Hi Jonathan, thank you for reviewing IntegrityNext. We are working on a way to better specify between company sizes/ industries.

Artur
スイスのRisk Manager
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

It is good, I see potential in this tool, and how it can support our actions.

4.0 7 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: Tail-end spend suppliers self assesment and bse to store basic information of vendors, online live tracking of progress, social media monitoring.

良いポイント:

Relatively easy in use, Customer oriented, delevelopment plan with solid roadmap, valuable for onbaording purpose, support from the IN side is profssional and proactively supports

改善してほしい点:

Still needs improvmenets, sometimes loading screen is milling too long, lack of customization for cusotmer needs.

Georg
Georg
オーストリアのDeputy Head of Prequalification
認証済みLinkedInユーザー
土木工学, 10,000+人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Review

5.0 6 年前

良いポイント:

Uploading the certificates was easy. The optical appearance is nice

改善してほしい点:

I wasn't able to formate the appearance on the profil page

Integrity Nextからの返信

6 年前

Hi Georg, thank you for reviewing. I will pass on your feedback to our support team.

MaryJo
アメリカのSales Representative
通信, 51~200人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

IntegrityNext Review

5.0 6 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: Simple to adapt to our processing methods.

良いポイント:

Easy to use and adapt for use with our internal processes.

改善してほしい点:

I have not found a con, using this software.

Integrity Nextからの返信

6 年前

Hi Maryjo, many thanks for the positive feedback.

Corey
アメリカのBDM
人材派遣、人材紹介, 51~200人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Vendor Review

5.0 6 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: We used this program as a vendor to submit information about our company to a client. This was simple to use and organized in a way that was super effective at getting the information needed.

良いポイント:

Visually easy to read and use. Direct and seamless work flow.

改善してほしい点:

The initial communication that we were required to complete the survey did not come from the direct end-client, which caused a delay in our response. An area of improvement would be for the end client that maintains the relationship with vendor advise that IntegrityNext would be sending the survey.

James
James
ルーマニアのDirector
認証済みLinkedInユーザー
石油、エネルギー, 11~50人規模の会社
使用期間: 無料トライアル
投稿経路

Great option for bidding on contracts and procurement

5.0 4 年前

良いポイント:

Great to keep all info in one place with regards to certifications to pass onto your client

改善してほしい点:

Validation of data uploaded should exist - third party

Jeniffer
ブラジルのAux. Comercial
運輸、トラック、鉄道, 51~200人規模の会社
使用期間: 6~12か月
投稿経路

Positive Software

4.0 6 年前

良いポイント:

Easy to interact with digital platforms; Has adequate support for doubts and step by step access; Modern aesthetic structure.

改善してほしい点:

Do not have translation options. Moreover, as every structure is always good to go through evolutionary processes.

Neena
アメリカのAssociate Director Operations & HR
バイオテクノロジー, 51~200人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Easy to use!

5.0 4 年前

良いポイント:

This software was very easy to use all around. It was very user friendly and had a great interface. I had to add two of my colleagues to the project and it was very easy to do so.

改善してほしい点:

I wasn't sure of there was some kind of submit button once we wrapped up the sections we needed to fill out. There wasn't which I found out when I talked to support (who were very helpful).

JD
アメリカのPrincipal
機械工業, 自営業
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Used it as a 3rd party

5.0 5 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: It was good but a lot of questions or considerations didn't really apply to small or single person companies.

良いポイント:

The software was fairly easy to use. I like that it displayed all the different categories on the main page and your progress

改善してほしい点:

A lot of things didn't apply to me. Maybe for small business there might be a more simplified workflow.

Saskia
ドイツのJunior Quality- and Environmental Manager
工業オートメーション, 201~500人規模の会社
使用期間: 無料トライアル
投稿経路

Easy to handle and good visualization of results

5.0 5 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: Easy going

良いポイント:

Easy handling. Mostly quick and easy to answer Yes / No questions. Clear and expressive presentation of the results at the end of the survey.

改善してほしい点:

The overall result and evaluation can only be presented and viewed at the end of the year (according to information of the IntegrityNext Support team).

Martin
スイスのOwner
経営コンサルティング, 2~10人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Content is nor relevant

1.0 4 年前

良いポイント:

Overview to complete the forms and easyness to use is really excellent.

改善してほしい点:

The content is not acurate. I'm a SME and just because I do have < 10 staff some of the options were simply not realistic to fullfill. But this gives my SME a really bad rating and does not reflect the trouth.

Thierry
ベルギーのSales Operations Manager
バイオテクノロジー, 201~500人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Every platform should be as simple and easy to use as this one

5.0 5 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: Really more funny to use as usual documents.
Good idea :)

良いポイント:

Smooth design, user friendly and intuitive

改善してほしい点:

Not related to the software since all requested information are not always find inside the company. Just show us that this approach is great in order to centralize all necessary informations

Roman
オーストリアのOperational Excellence Manager
電気・電子機器製造, 201~500人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Creating a sustainability Report

4.0 6 年前

良いポイント:

It is very simple to use. The main menu is structured very clear.

改善してほしい点:

At 2 points i had the possibility to answer the questions with "keine Angaben" or like this. The answer that i get, was that i can`t choose this specific answer because the question could not be evaluated.

Sashidhar
英国のSr.Manager - Contract , Commercials & Business Planning
情報技術、情報サービス, 10,000+人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Perfect Digital Solution for CSR and Sustainability Requirements

5.0 5 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: IntegrityNext helped us assess CSR and sustainability compliance requirements with such an ease that multiple stakeholders & dispersed teams inputs could be collated and presented in a seamless manner in a single dashboard.

良いポイント:

Ease of use and overall design is very good.

改善してほしい点:

None to specifically mention as everything is seamless

Ian
英国のSales
ワイヤレス, 11~50人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Simple but efective

4.0 6 年前

良いポイント:

Easy to use and navigate. Also I found it simple to add additional compliance sections.

改善してほしい点:

Only used it once as requested by one of my customer for compliance issues so nothing not to like so far.

Integrity Nextからの返信

6 年前

Hi Ian, thank you for your positive feedback!

Carsten
ドイツのSenior Consultant
市場調査, 51~200人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Simple handling; partly difficult questions

4.0 6 年前

良いポイント:

Simplicity of handling and clarity of use

改善してほしい点:

Questions sometimes difficult to answer and not relevant for our company

Integrity Nextからの返信

6 年前

Hi Carsten, many thanks for your feedback. We are working on a way to specify between company sizes and industries.

NAYAN
インドのCEO
電気・電子機器製造, 11~50人規模の会社
使用期間: 無料トライアル
投稿経路

EASY SOFTWARE FOR ORGNISATION STATUS UPDATE

5.0 6 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: GREAT

良いポイント:

EASE OF WORKING WITH THIS SOFTWARE AND PLATFORM

改善してほしい点:

THE LINK TO THE SCORING IS ABSOLUTELY STRAIGHT IN SOME ISSUES THE WEIGHTAGE SYSTEM SHOULD BE USED AS PER THE USERS IMPORTANCE OF PARTICULAR ACTIVITY

GRAHAM
英国のCompliance Manager
建設, 11~50人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

IntegrityNext ideal for company accreditations

5.0 4 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: It was pleasant.

良いポイント:

It was very intuitive to start using and easy to upload items.

改善してほしい点:

There was no user control for resizing or other manipulation of images uploaded.

Ana
ポルトガルのOperations Manager
情報技術、情報サービス, 501~1,000人規模の会社
使用期間: 6~12か月
投稿経路

Easy to use

4.0 6 年前

良いポイント:

Was easy to use and navigate around, a way to quickly control suppliers, secure

改善してほしい点:

I do not have anything to point out.....

Mike
アメリカのCorp EHS Manager
医療機器, 1,001~5,000人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Easy to use!

4.0 5 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: Good product

良いポイント:

easy to use software and beneficial to my business

改善してほしい点:

Nothing, all was good and to our expectations. It was straight forward and easy to navigate.

Kai
ドイツのGeschäftsführer
機械工業, 11~50人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Product Review

4.0 5 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: Fast and easy to use

良いポイント:

Easy to use and fast to fill out.

改善してほしい点:

no special items for german company Some questions are senseless or not for german company relevant