--- description: GitLabを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitLabとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [アプリ開発ツール](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [GitLab](/software/159806/gitlab) # GitLab Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/159806/gitlab ページ：1 / 50\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/159806/gitlab?page=2) > 時間追跡を使用したワークフロープロセスの改善や、規制遵守などを実現するクラウドベースのDevOpsソリューション。 > > 評価：1223人のユーザーによる評価は**4.6/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### GitLabの対象ユーザー クラウドベースのDevOpsプラットフォームで、中小企業から大企業まで、時間追跡を使用したビジネス運営の改善、インシデント管理、コードレビュー、規制遵守などを支援することができます。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.6/5** | 1223 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.5/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: GitLab - **設立**: 2011 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $29.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Windows（オンプレミス）, Linux（オンプレミス） - **サポートされる言語**: ドイツ語, フランス語, 中国語, 日本語, 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アイルランド, アゼルバイジャン, アフガニスタン, アメリカ合衆国, アラブ首長国連邦, アルジェリア, アルゼンチン, アルバ, アルバニア, アルメニア, アンギラ, アンゴラ, アンティグア・バーブーダ, アンドラ, イエメン, イギリス, イスラエル, イタリア, イラク さらに205件 ## 機能 - API - Automated Testing - ITレポート - Real-Time Analytics - アクセス制御・許可 - アプリケーション・セキュリティ - アラート／通知 - グラフィカル・ユーザーインタフェース - コラボレーションツール - コンプライアンス管理 - コードレポジトリ統合 - コード点検 - タスク管理 - テスト管理 - テンプレートのカスタマイズ - デバッグ - ドラッグ・アンド・ドロップ - バグ追跡 - バージョン管理 - プロジェクト計画 - プロジェクト追跡 - ポートフォリオ管理 - マイルストーン追跡 - モニタリング - リソース管理 - リリース管理 - レポジトリ管理 - ワークフロー管理 - 優先順位付け - 品質保証 - 報告、プロジェクト追跡 - 変更管理 - 承認プロセス管理 - 承認ワークフロー - 統合型開発環境 - 継続的インテグレーション - 継続的デプロイ - 継続的デリバリ - 脆弱性診断 - 設定の管理 - 課題管理 ## 統合 (合計39件) - Akismet - Anchore - Asana - Assembla - Bamboo - Beyond Identity - Bitbucket - Bridgecrew - Bugzilla - Buildkite - Campfire Blaze - Checkmarx One - Datadog - Deepfactor - Discord ... さらに24件の統合 ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [アプリ開発ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [アプリ開発ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [非営利プロジェクト管理ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) - [CIツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) - [DevOpsツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31120/devops/software) - [アジャイルプロジェクト管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31556/agile-project-management-tools/software) ## 代替製品 1. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.jp/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6187 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.jp/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15417 reviews) 3. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.capterra.jp/software/101288/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3007 reviews) 4. [Airtable](https://www.capterra.jp/software/146652/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2238 reviews) 5. [Bitbucket](https://www.capterra.jp/software/157785/bitbucket) — 4.6/5 (1346 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Very Easy To Use" — 4.0/5 > **Federico** | *2025年1月9日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: GitLab is very easy to use and it has everything I need for software development. I can manage my code, collaborate with my colleagues, and automate my workflow > > **改善点**: Nothing really bad, except it can be a bit slow sometimes. But overall, it's a great tool for developers\! ----- ### "Provides everything required for a DevSecOps workflow" — 4.0/5 > **VENUGOPAL** | *2024年8月10日* | コンピュータ・ソフトウェア | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: 1. Integrated platform for all my CI/CD needs 2. Great to options for runner, one of the only platforms to provide native kubernetes runner support. 3. Robust options in terms of pipeline flexibility. You can have parent and child pipeline models for complex pipelines > > **改善点**: 1. Because of native support, its flexibility highly depends upon bug fixes done by gitlab team 2. Support on forums is difficult to get unless you have purchased a support package. 3. Newer runners such as kubernetes are yet to get matured. In my personal experience the feature additions are not yet integrated completely but get added as patches on the running pods. This should be a part of config.toml > > Over all, gitlab provides everything thats essential for simple and slightly complex pipeline requirements. But becomes less flexible for more complex application requirements where ML work loads are to be executed. As I see Gitlab team adds features in a commendable frequency, so if anything is unavailable, you can raise a ticket and sit tight till it gets added. ----- ### "The UI is easy for beginners to understand, and pipeline management is convenient." — 5.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2024年7月15日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Having used both GitHub and GitLab, I found that GitLab stands out with its beginner-friendly UI and easy-to-use pipeline management. The reason is that I prioritize how quickly someone can catch up when joining a new project and using a tool. In this aspect, I highly recommend GitLab. > > **改善点**: While this doesn't affect enterprise plans, the free plan has some limitations. Additionally, unlike other software, it lacks substantial community support. > > When undertaking any development project, people generally think of GitLab and GitHub for code management and CI/CD tools. However, considerations regarding UI and the speed of catching up are often overlooked. I would like to share my thoughts on these aspects. ----- ### "A powerful DevOps powerhouse with a dense but complete interface" — 5.0/5 > **Enguerran** | *2026年5月18日* | スポーツ用品 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: GitLab has this biggest edge, like it really leans into a full, everything-in-one DevOps platform kind of approach. You get source code management, issue tracking, and CI/CD pipelines that are built in, all tied together inside one single interface, and yeah it feels like a huge productivity push. Setting up pipeline stuff through .gitlab-ci.yml is pretty direct, plus the native Container Registry makes it genuinely easy to roll out Docker images, especially during our day to day development sprints. > > **改善点**: The user interface can feel kind of overwhelming and cluttered, especially when you’re trying to move through those deeply nested settings or while reviewing a complex Merge Request. For non-technical folks, like Product Owners who are tracking issues day to day the initial learning curve is pretty steep. On top of that, the self-hosted instance can get resource-heavy and it tends to need regular maintenance so runner performances stay optimal or at least not degrade to much. > > We use GitLab as our main repository hosting and deployment server, it kinda bridges the gap between engineering and QA workflows. It works well, it links things up without too much friction and honestly it feels solid. Being able to lock down branches, spin up runners to automate code quality checks , and then track deployments automatically, gives us huge security and that calm peace of mind. Overall it is an indispensable, sturdy tool for modern team collaboration and DevOps orchestration, even when things get messy, we still stay on track. ----- ### "The Best All-in-One DevOps Platform, Especially for CI/CD" — 5.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2025年12月15日* | 政府機関 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I really appreciate GitLab’s single-application approach—it’s become the backbone of our entire DevOps workflow. The built-in CI/CD pipelines are a game-changer; being able to define the entire build, test, and deployment process in a single .gitlab-ci.yml file right in the repository is so much more efficient than juggling separate tools like Jenkins. We rely heavily on merge requests, and the integrated security scanning (SAST/DAST) is a huge plus—it gives developers immediate feedback during the merge process, which helps us catch issues early and maintain quality without slowing down delivery. > > **改善点**: From my experience, GitLab can feel quite resource-intensive, especially when we’re running a self-hosted instance or dealing with pipelines that include complex jobs. I’ve noticed performance slowdowns when navigating large project backlogs or loading detailed merge request diffs, which can be frustrating during critical reviews. While the UI is generally intuitive, the sheer breadth of features—issues, boards, CI/CD, security—can make the initial setup and configuration overwhelming for new team members. It takes some time and guidance before they feel comfortable. > > In my experience, GitLab has truly streamlined our journey from idea to deployment. As a DevOps Engineer, I rely heavily on its seamless integration of source control, issue tracking, and CI/CD automation to keep our delivery pipeline moving at a high velocity. While I’ve noticed a slight learning curve and occasional performance hiccups at scale, the depth of features—especially the native GitOps capabilities—has made it my go-to platform for modern software development and deployment. It’s a solution that genuinely supports the way we work. ----- ページ：1 / 50\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/159806/gitlab?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/159806/gitlab) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## 構造化データ