--- description: Codemagicを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Codemagicとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [アプリ開発ツール](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [Codemagic](/software/152573/nevercode) # Codemagic Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/152573/nevercode ページ：1 / 6\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/152573/nevercode?page=2) > Android、iOS、Cordova、Ionic、React Native、およびFlutterプロジェクト向けのCI/CD。 > > 評価：125人のユーザーによる評価は**4.7/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Codemagicの対象ユーザー トヨタ、Hootsuite、シュナイダーエレクトリック、InvoiceNinjaといった企業が、エンジニアリング・チームの時間を節約し、より迅速に市場に投入するためにCodemagic利用しています。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.7/5** | 125 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Nevercode - **設立**: 2017 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $0.04 - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000 - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ）, Linux（デスクトップ）, Chromebook（デスクトップ）, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アイルランド, アゼルバイジャン, アフガニスタン, アメリカ合衆国, アラブ首長国連邦, アルゼンチン, アルバニア, アルメニア, アンドラ, イエメン, イギリス, イスラエル, イタリア, イラク, イラン, インド, インドネシア, ウクライナ, ウズベキスタン さらに102件 ## 機能 - API - Automated Testing - グラフィカル・ユーザーインタフェース - コラボレーションツール - デバッグ - バージョン管理 - パイプライン管理 - マルチユーザー・コラボレーション - ワークフロー管理 - 互換性テスト - 統合型開発環境 - 継続的デプロイ - 継続的デリバリ ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [アプリ開発ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [アプリ開発ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [テスト自動化ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [CIツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) ## 代替製品 1. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.jp/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6206 reviews) 2. [Essential Studio](https://www.capterra.jp/software/32602/essential-studio) — 4.6/5 (950 reviews) 3. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.capterra.jp/software/101288/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3017 reviews) 4. [Jira](https://www.capterra.jp/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15498 reviews) 5. [IntelliJ IDEA](https://www.capterra.jp/software/136010/intellij-idea) — 4.7/5 (1262 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Overall Good CI/CD for Flutter" — 5.0/5 > **Ivo** | *2021年7月1日* | 金融サービス | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Good integration with Bitbucket, easy to use UI to set up CI jobs. Mac machines with everything preinstalled to do Flutter testing, build and releases. Allows auto-cancelling of previous builds if new commits are pushed. Especially App Store Connect helpers were very welcome since we didn't have much experience with publishing iOS apps. Newer Yaml configuration option also works well and can of course be versioned with the rest of the app. > > **改善点**: Lately webhook events are sometimes processed out of order when you have multiple coming in (for example you push to a branch with an open PR, which triggers a hook for both the push and the P{R update). That can lead to the wrong builds being auto-cancelled and a bit of confusion as to whats happening. Sometime issues with retrieving build logs. Dark mode could use more contrast. Linux machines still lack cache support. All in all only minor issues though. > > We needed a CI to build and publish a Flutter app for Android and iOS to both stores as well as Firebase App Distribution. Bitbucket Pipelines doesn't offer Mac machines so we chose something Flutter-specific to not have to worry about Flutter setup in CI. The good pre-configuration of the build machines as well as publishing tools saved us a lot of time in setting up the CI. ----- ### "Unity CI/CD" — 5.0/5 > **Enes** | *2022年6月1日* | コンピュータ・ゲーム | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: We were having a hard time building our games on Jenkins and codemagic came to the rescue. We can take concurrent builds at the same time for iOS, since it's a SaaS we don't have to manage the platform. It's very easy to use and set up. Pretty cheap when you compare it with the other platforms. > > **改善点**: You can store your codemagic.yaml file on the website so you always have to have it on your repository. > > We have faster build times. It is more secure than Jenkins. Very easy to setup for developers and other team members. ----- ### "Give your review a title Excellent Flutter CI/CD platform for iOS and Android" — 5.0/5 > **Khaled** | *2026年8月23日* | 健康、ウェルネス、フィットネス | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Codemagic makes building Flutter apps for both iOS and Android incredibly simple. The interface is clean, the workflow editor is easy to understand, and setting up code signing and building IPA and AAB files is much faster than doing everything manually. I especially like being able to build both platforms from one place using a Mac build machine. > > **改善点**: Some of the advanced settings can be a little confusing the first time, especially options such as Shorebird, code signing, and distribution. A few more beginner-friendly explanations directly inside the workflow editor would make the setup even easier. > > My overall experience has been excellent. I was able to connect my private GitHub repository, configure my Flutter project, set up Android and iOS signing, and start a release build very quickly. The platform saves a huge amount of time compared with managing separate build environments manually. The UI is also very polished and makes the whole process feel professional. Definitely one of the best tools I have used for Flutter CI/CD. ----- ### "Mobile app hardware limitation" — 3.0/5 > **Mahendra** | *2021年7月3日* | 翻訳、ローカライゼーション | おすすめ評価：6.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The service of auto code signing and build triggers upon the commits with conditional triggers > > **改善点**: IOs code signing and slack support. the codemagic have very poor documentation for code signing they should given more example and help in code signing process . like i use gaming laptop i dont have ios and now i need ios app ipa file not to upload on appstore but for me to check max size before deliver. i should not need developer account for this . i can do it with xcode and so i can do it with mac cli rather then doing changes every time i can automate it but no help for that while there is appcircle ci/cd which provide their code. > > i Had made atleast 250+ build request and no doubt for time management this is unbeatable you do not need to wait in queue for long even you have free tier . Codemagic gives default installations of jq like tools which help us to save time in installing it every time plus cache service for add more option in default tools. ----- ### "Magic bullet for mobile CI/CD" — 4.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2021年7月3日* | コンピュータ・ソフトウェア | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The UI configuration wizard is one of the coolest thing of the whole system. Also, 1st class Flutter projects support is something I was looking for. > > **改善点**: There is no way to easily do a feature request or contact support, since Codemagic pushes users to their Slack community instead of giving a chance to just contact the right person. Also, after using Bitrise for quite some time it feels like Codemagic misses some additional predefined steps for configuration. ----- ページ：1 / 6\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/152573/nevercode?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/152573/nevercode) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | tr | | ----- ## 構造化データ