--- description: Ideagen EHSを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Ideagen EHSとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [エネルギーマネジメントシステム](/directory/20018/energy-management/software) > [Ideagen EHS](/software/150019/Ideagen-EHS) # Ideagen EHS Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/150019/Ideagen-EHS ページ：1 / 4\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/150019/Ideagen-EHS?page=2) > ProcessMAPは、環境、健康と安全、リスク・データの管理の複雑さを企業が克服できるよう作成されました。 > > 評価：67人のユーザーによる評価は**4.4/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Ideagen EHSの対象ユーザー 対象市場は、北米、南米、ラテン・アメリカおよびカリブ諸国共同体、ヨーロッパ、中東、アジア太平洋地域と日本およびオセアニア。 対象機能はEHS、持続可能性、環境。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.4/5** | 67 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 80% | (8/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Ideagen - **設立**: 1993 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格モデル**: (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ）, Windows（オンプレミス）, Chromebook（デスクトップ）, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: アイスランド語, アイルランド語, イタリア語, インドネシア語, エストニア語, オランダ語, クロアチア語, スウェーデン語, スペイン語, チェコ語, デンマーク語, トルコ語, ドイツ語, ハンガリー語, フィンランド語, フランス語, ブルガリア語, ベトナム語, ポルトガル語, ポーランド語, マレー語, ルーマニア語, ロシア語, 日本語, 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アメリカ合衆国, イギリス, オーストラリア ## 機能 - Air Emissions Management - Carbon Emissions Calculations - OSHA記録保持 - Risk Analysis - Third-Party Integrations - アクセス制御・許可 - アクティビティ・ダッシュボード - アラート／通知 - インシデント・レポート - インシデント管理 - オンコール・スケジューリング - クレーム管理 - コラボレーションツール - コンプライアンス管理 - コンプライアンス追跡 - ステータス追跡 - ダッシュボード - テンプレートのカスタマイズ - データの可視化 - ドキュメントのコーディングおよび制御 - ドキュメント・キャプチャ - ドキュメント・ストレージ - ドキュメント分類 - バージョン管理 - ファイル共有 - ファイル変換 - フォーム管理 - メンテナンス管理 - モニタリング - リスク評価 - リスク評価 - レポートのカスタマイズ - ワークフロー管理 - 危険物管理 - 変更管理 - 廃棄物管理 - 応答管理 - 持続可能性管理 - 排出モニタリング - 排出削減計画 - 是正措置・予防措置 (CAPA) - 検索／フィルター - 機器管理 - 水管理 - 温室効果ガス追跡 - 点検管理 - 監査管理 - 監査計画 - 達成、リテンション - 電子署名 ... さらに12件の機能 ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [エネルギーマネジメントシステム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/20018/energy-management/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [エネルギーマネジメントシステム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/20018/energy-management/software) - [排出管理ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30554/emissions-management/software) - [環境マネジメントシステム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30662/environmental/software) - [リスクマネジメントシステム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30665/risk-management/software) - [EHSシステム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10015/ehs-management/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Connecteam](https://www.capterra.jp/software/153140/connecteam) — 4.6/5 (5213 reviews) 2. [MasterControl Quality Excellence](https://www.capterra.jp/software/148577/mastercontrol) — 4.5/5 (534 reviews) 3. [SafetyCulture](https://www.capterra.jp/software/141080/iauditor) — 4.6/5 (353 reviews) 4. [SiteDocs](https://www.capterra.jp/software/143579/sitedocs) — 4.8/5 (255 reviews) 5. [Redzone](https://www.capterra.jp/software/176109/redzone-productivity) — 4.9/5 (281 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Finally, a system that delivers at a wonderfully affordable price" — 5.0/5 > **Ian** | *2021年8月22日* | 航空宇宙産業 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: It truly delivers a range of services and features and a wonderfully affordable price. The implementation is simple; the features provide incredible flexibility to configure the system to deliver what I need. I cannot speak highly enough of the product and support. I have now implemented it in 4 different businesses because it is so flexible and cost-effective. > > **改善点**: The system really has little not to like. The key is to think strategically to decide the data hierarchies to limit changes once the system is implemented. > > A simply outstanding product and so cost-effective for the functionality it provides. Not really surprising to see the list of companies it has been implemented in. ----- ### "Good value for money." — 5.0/5 > **Marcia** | *2025年1月22日* | 政府機関 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Intuitive, simple to use and cost effective > > **改善点**: There isn't much that I don't like, Though the risk management module is not intuitive and doesnt flow the way traditional static organisations would use it. It appears to be more focussed on a transitional environment such as construction or project based activities. Also I would suggest a review of the workflow for managing incidents could be better. > > I have nothing but good things to say about Ideagen Lucidity. From their Customer service, which is friendly and efficient, to the system itself. ----- ### "Functional Limitations, Poor Governance, and Administrative Inefficiencies" — 2.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2026年4月23日* | 建設 | おすすめ評価：0.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The platform offers reasonable value for money compared to other products on the market. It is generally user-friendly for end users, with a relatively intuitive interface for day-to-day use. However, this ease of use does not extend to set-up and administration, which are more complex and less intuitive. From a governance perspective, document control is weak, and the overall structure of the platform appears poorly planned and organised. This creates challenges in maintaining consistency, traceability, and confidence in the integrity of records over time. > > **改善点**: We predominantly rely on the InForm and Incident modules, as limitations in the other modules reduce their practicality and tend to complicate, rather than support, our processes. My experience with the InForm and Incident modules has been consistently frustrating. A key issue is the inability to properly preview forms that include conditional logic. Conditional fields do not display in preview mode, meaning administrators are forced to publish forms to validate them. This is not just inconvenient, it introduces real risk, as errors are only identified once the form is live. The suggested workaround of creating new versions to test changes is not practical in a controlled environment, as it disrupts internal reporting, impacts data continuity, and complicates the investigation of historical records. In addition, basic configuration tasks such as bulk editing fields, rearranging table columns, or converting field types require unnecessary rework, making the build process inefficient and time-consuming. The platform also falls short in terms of usability and flexibility when managing more complex forms. There is limited control over layout and structure, such as the inability to easily rearrange sections, minimise them, or apply conditional logic at a section level. Simple improvements, like consistent default radio button configurations or clearer visual distinction between sections, are missing. Administrative inefficiencies are further compounded by poor duplication behaviour, lack of formatting options, and rigid field settings. These issues collectively make it difficult to build structured, user-friendly forms at scale, and increase the likelihood of inconsistencies across projects. From a governance and systems perspective, the most significant concern is the lack of robust document control. There is no visibility over revision history, including who made changes, when they were made, or what was updated. There is also no ability to undo changes. This creates a major gap in traceability and accountability, particularly in environments where compliance and auditability are critical. Broader system issues, such as glitches between mobile and web submissions, poor integration between actions and parent records, limitations in role configuration, and inefficient file upload processes, further reduce confidence in the platform. While it may appear cost-effective at face value, the operational inefficiencies, compliance risks, and administrative burden significantly outweigh any initial savings. > > Not positive. They do not take feedback onboard or feature requests. They have no clear road-map of what is being worked on. In the past two years they have allocated time (and money) to introducing 2 new versions both of which were face-lifts only. ----- ### "Safety safety safety.. Incident reports made easy\!" — 5.0/5 > **Renee** | *2024年12月13日* | 建築資材 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: After utilizing this software multiple times while on-site today, I wanted to leave a review. Consumers tend to leave reviews when a product dissapoints them \& EHS has done nothing but impress me, the more that I utilize it\! The dashboard is what's truly sold me on this software\! It's updated in real time, so there's no waiting around for a list or an email to provide to our safety team about things that need addressed. Nobody has to run around trying to find someone or get the information relayed second hand. > > **改善点**: I had to figure out how to re-size my photos because I sometimes get an error stating the file is too large. (When uploading to a report) Pictures of the injury or areas of concern such as a safety concern are important so luckily it was a simple fix to get my phone to take photos that aren't huge. > > Our business is one of the most dangerous ones in the industry. We make windows \& doors \& as you can imagine, that involves a lot of broken glass which can cause serious injuries. We've finally found the software that works across the board for everyone from the hourly worker to the project managers. EHS is faster, easier \& much more efficient for documenting incidents than the other software we've implemented in the past. They thought of all the important questions to ask in order to collect the critical details to reduce the risk of future accidents from occurring. This software utilizes an exact footprint of our building so employees are able to document exactly where the incident occurred. The best part of this software is that if someone recognizes something that could potentially be an issue in the future, they can simply report it in EHS, without the hassle of trying to track down someone from maintenance or the safety team . We are provided with immediate updates of what we call "hotspots," so they can be addressed right away. We have found that with this software, employees are recording a lot more non-injury incidents than they have in the past. The feedback we've received from our employees about switching to EHS has overall been positive. There's an option to report a non-injury incident, which was not available with our previous software. Our safety team wants every bit of information they can get in order to properly implement risk management \& this software makes that happen. Our company has already seen a decline in incidents by making the necessary changes to prevent them ahead of time. EHS hasn't missed a thing \& I don't imagine we'll be changing to a different program ever again. ----- ### "A great product for those who're looking for more than just compliance management" — 5.0/5 > **Theresa** | *2023年3月2日* | 経営コンサルティング | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: We Initially used Lucidity Software to maintain our Integrated Management System, however, it's now become an integral part of our business. Whilst the system is modular, there are many core features that are common across all modules, meaning our people quickly became familiar with the look and feel of each module. We use the App for all our site work, and it's literally a game changer. > > **改善点**: Not a criticism of Lucidity itself, but working in the construction industry, there are still occasions where we come up against the "what's wrong with a paper form" attitude. Now that Lucidity has introduced the App though, we're hearing this less and less. Inform really makes it so easy to complete site "paperwork" online. > > I've loved using Lucidity, both in my own company and with my clients. Compared to some of the older compliance management options out there, it really is a breath of fresh air. ----- ページ：1 / 4\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/150019/Ideagen-EHS?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/150019/Ideagen-EHS) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | ja | | ----- ## 構造化データ