--- description: Boxを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Boxとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [デジタルサイネージソフト](/directory/10055/digital-signage/software) > [Box](/software/148766/box) # Box Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/148766/box ページ：1 / 227\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/148766/box?page=2) > Boxを使用することで、チームは、コンテンツのライフサイクル全体をサポートするためにつくられた、セキュアな単一コラボレーション・プラットフォームで、どこからでも作業することが可能になります。 > > 評価：5637人のユーザーによる評価は**4.4/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Boxの対象ユーザー Boxは、中小企業からグローバル企業まで、あらゆる業界とビジネス・サイズ向けのワークプレイス・ソリューションです。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.4/5** | 5637 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.5/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 80% | (8/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Box - **設立**: 2005 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $20.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ）, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: イタリア語, オランダ語, スウェーデン語, スペイン語, デンマーク語, トルコ語, ドイツ語, ヒンディー語, フィンランド語, フランス語, ポルトガル語, ポーランド語, ロシア語, 中国語, 日本語, 繁体中国語, 英語, 韓国語 - **利用可能な国**: アメリカ合衆国, イギリス, インド, オーストラリア, カナダ, ドイツ, 中国, 日本 ## 機能 - @メンション - Real-Time Monitoring - Subcontractor Monitoring - Task Editing - アクセス制御・許可 - アクティビティの追跡 - アクティビティ・ダッシュボード - コメント、メモ - コラボレーションツール - コンテンツライブラリ - コンテンツ公開オプション - コンテンツ管理 - ステータス追跡 - セキュア・データストレージ - セキュア・ファイルビューア - タグ付け - タスク管理 - テキスト編集 - テンプレートのカスタマイズ - テンプレート管理 - データのインポート／エクスポート - データストレージ管理 - データセキュリティ - データ同期 - ドキュメント・キャプチャ - ドキュメント・ストレージ - ドキュメント分類 - ドキュメント管理 - ドラッグ・アンド・ドロップ - バックアップ、修復 - ファイル転送 - フルテキスト検索 - ブランディングのカスタマイズ - プロジェクト追跡 - ミーティング管理 - メタデータ管理 - メッセージング - モバイル・アクセス - リアルタイム同期 - リモートアクセス／コントロール - リモートサポート - 優先順位付け - 割り当て管理 - 原価見積もり - 暗号化 - 監査証跡 - 納期管理 - 認証 - 資産分類 - 電子署名 ... さらに16件の機能 ## 統合 (合計76件) - Adobe Workfront - Airtable - AppOmni - AppSheet - Asana - Benchling - Bluebeam Revu - CI HUB Connector - ChatGPT - Claris Connect - Claude - CloudSign（クラウドサイン） - Darktrace - Device Magic - Docusign ... さらに61件の統合 ## サポートのオプション - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [デジタルサイネージソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10055/digital-signage/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [デジタルサイネージソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10055/digital-signage/software) - [文書管理システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30063/document-management/software) - [グループウェア](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [CMS（コンテンツ管理システム）](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10007/content-management/software) - [DAM（デジタルアセットマネジメント）](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30203/digital-asset-management/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Google Drive](https://www.capterra.jp/software/161425/drive) — 4.8/5 (28542 reviews) 2. [Google Workspace](https://www.capterra.jp/software/168389/google-workspace) — 4.7/5 (17618 reviews) 3. [OneDrive](https://www.capterra.jp/software/161304/onedrive) — 4.5/5 (12768 reviews) 4. [Microsoft 365](https://www.capterra.jp/software/58688/microsoft-365) — 4.6/5 (14116 reviews) 5. [Microsoft SharePoint](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1167/sharepoint) — 4.4/5 (5446 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Handy instrument for content collaboration" — 4.0/5 > **Maria** | *2026年4月22日* | 薬品 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: It is easy to collaborate on documents. I can leave comments or propose changes in the text - it is very handy for articles and other documents, because we have a lot of people involved in the content creation and coordination. > > **改善点**: The interface might be confusing for less technically sophisticated people. I had to create a video tutorial on commenting because some colleagues couldn't figure out how to open the document and leave their notes. > > As an editor, I work with articles from multiple authors and collaborate in a box with authors, medical reviewers, and other stakeholders. We collect all the comments for materials and work on them together before we reach an agreement, and the document is accepted. Box helps keep all the history of comments and changes, and it also helps avoid the situation where someone has the wrong or outdated version of the article for review. ----- ### "Heavy File go easy" — 5.0/5 > **Vertika** | *2026年3月1日* | 医療機器 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: It has the feature to upload and keep very heavy files any excel, documents, which is not possible to share and access on outlook > > **改善点**: Ask for access for logging in, like there are two access window to acknowledge either own company or outside the company, the consent and login to be provided , if outside ethe company, email is required to access the file. This step is mandatory to work every time on same file - box feature > > Perfect so far, it allows excel sheet to be linked with salesforce as well, live fresh up to date data is refreshed and can be access with multiple team members ----- ### "CLOUD STORAGE" — 4.0/5 > **Andrea** | *2025年10月17日* | 機械・産業工学 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: As a consultant working with sensitive and complex engineering data, security and controlled access are my top priorities. What I appreciate most about Box is its robust set of security and administrative features. The ability to create secure folders for each project and invite clients or team members with granular permissions (e.g., view-only, uploader, editor) is invaluable. This ensures that valuable intellectual property, like proprietary CAD designs for motorsport applications, is protected. Furthermore, the version control system is excellent. In mechanical design, we go through countless iterations. Box automatically saves previous versions of a file, allowing me to track changes or revert to an earlier design if necessary. This provides a clear audit trail and prevents the common issue of team members working off of outdated files. The platform serves as a reliable single source of truth for all project-related documentation. > > **改善点**: While Box is great for general file management, its performance and features lag when handling the specific demands of heavy 3D CAD files and complex assemblies. Syncing very large files (often several gigabytes) through the desktop client can be slow and resource-intensive, interrupting workflow. More importantly, Box lacks the specialized tools I rely on in dedicated Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems like Teamcenter or Windchill. It doesn't have an integrated 3D viewer that can properly render complex assemblies, check for interferences, or manage part dependencies and Bills of Materials (BOMs). This means I always have to download the files locally to do any meaningful engineering review, which adds an extra, inefficient step to the process. > > My overall experience with Box is positive, with the understanding that it is a tool for secure file sharing and collaboration, not a replacement for a dedicated engineering PLM solution. It excels at centralizing project documents, managing client deliverables, and facilitating communication around non-CAD files like specifications, reports, and presentations. The security infrastructure gives me confidence when sharing sensitive information with external partners. However, for the core task of collaborative mechanical design, it serves more as a secure repository than an active workspace. It's an excellent complementary tool in my digital toolkit for managing the business side of engineering projects, but it falls short of handling the high-performance demands and intricacies of iterative 3D design work. ----- ### "Stay away from these crooks" — 1.0/5 > **Anne** | *2025年7月25日* | 金融サービス | おすすめ評価：0.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: It works well as long as you don't have a security breach and need support. If you try contacting them, they are resistant and angry, which on top of ignorance is hard to take. > > **改善点**: TERRIBLE customer service. Huge overcharges that they refuse to even acknowledge much less credit back. NEVER give this company a credit card. > > I tried to reduce the number of seats we are charged for with their online tool and they charged for double the number of seats. After a week, the only response to multiple inquiries is "You have to call on the phone," but their site provides no phone number. But I'm not offended: they also refuse to respond to the credit card company and the Better Business Bureau. Either Box is terribly managed or they actually care more about a few thousand dollars than about their reputation as corporate pirates. This company has deteriorated in the last few years and now Dropbox is far better. ----- ### "Secure, Reliable Document Management Built for Enterprise" — 5.0/5 > **Radha** | *2026年4月23日* | 法律サービス | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: What I liked most about Box was its strong focus on secure, enterprise‑grade file storage and collaboration, combined with ease of use. In particular: Robust security and compliance – Box excels at protecting sensitive information with granular permission controls, encryption, and compliance features, making it especially well‑suited for organizations handling confidential documents. Easy, intuitive file sharing – Sharing files and folders—internally or externally—is simple and user‑friendly, with clear control over access levels and expiration settings. Strong collaboration features – Real‑time comments, version history, and file previews made collaboration straightforward without needing to download files. Excellent Microsoft integration – Seamless integration with tools like Microsoft 365 (Word, Excel, Outlook) made it easy to edit and collaborate on documents without leaving Box. Centralized document management – Box did a great job of keeping documents organized and accessible, reducing version confusion and scattered file storage. Overall, what stood out most was Box’s ability to balance security with usability. It felt reliable and professional while still being easy for users to collaborate efficiently—particularly valuable for teams or organizations with strict data protection requirements. > > **改善点**: What I liked least about Box was that, while it’s very strong on security and compliance, it can sometimes feel heavy and less flexible for everyday use. In particular: Interface can feel cluttered – With many enterprise features layered in, the user experience isn’t always as clean or intuitive as some lighter file‑sharing tools. Performance with large folders – Navigating or syncing folders with many large files could occasionally feel slow. Offline access limitations – Working with files offline wasn’t always as seamless, especially compared to native desktop file systems. Administrative complexity – Managing permissions, policies, and settings requires careful attention, which can be time‑consuming for administrators. Cost for advanced features – Pricing can add up, particularly when advanced security, collaboration, or compliance features are required. Overall, the main drawback was that Box sometimes felt overbuilt for simpler needs. It’s excellent for regulated or security‑focused environments, but for teams looking for speed and simplicity first, it can feel more complex than necessary. > > My overall experience with Box was reliable and professional, particularly in environments where security, compliance, and document control are priorities. Box performed very well as a centralized document management and collaboration platform. It provided strong confidence that files were stored securely, with clear version history, access controls, and auditability. Sharing documents—both internally and with external parties—was straightforward, and the ability to manage permissions at a granular level was especially valuable when working with sensitive or confidential information. Collaboration features such as file previews, comments, and real‑time editing worked smoothly and reduced the need to download documents or rely on multiple versions. Integration with Microsoft 365 was a notable strength, allowing documents to be edited and co‑authored efficiently while remaining within Box’s secure environment. That said, the experience sometimes felt heavy for everyday use. The interface can feel busy, especially for users who only need basic file storage and sharing. Performance occasionally slowed when working with large folders or many files, and offline access was less intuitive than native desktop file systems. From an administrative perspective, managing settings and permissions required careful oversight, which added complexity. Overall, I found Box to be a strong, enterprise‑grade solution that excels in security and governance. While it may feel overbuilt for simple file sharing needs, it delivers significant value for organizations that require structured document management, compliance, and controlled collaboration. ----- ページ：1 / 227\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/148766/box?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/148766/box) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## 構造化データ