--- description: Sencha Ext JSを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Sencha Ext JSとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [アプリ開発ツール](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [Sencha Ext JS](/software/148124/sencha-platform) # Sencha Ext JS Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/148124/sencha-platform ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/148124/sencha-platform?page=2) > Sencha Ext JSは、クロスプラットフォームのWebおよびモバイルアプリケーション構築用の構築済みUIコンポーネントを備えたJavaScriptフレームワークです。 > > 評価：23人のユーザーによる評価は**4.2/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Sencha Ext JSの対象ユーザー あらゆる規模のビジネス向けに設計されたフロントエンドフレームワークで、企業、開発者、UI／UXデザイナーなどを対象とし、Senchaツールを使用してクロスプラットフォーム・アプリケーションを構築できます。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.2/5** | 23 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 3.8/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 3.7/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 3.8/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 70% | (7/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Sencha - **設立**: 2007 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $1,499.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ） - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイルランド, アメリカ合衆国, イギリス, イタリア, オランダ, オーストリア, カナダ, クロアチア, シンガポール, スイス, スウェーデン, スペイン, デンマーク, ドイツ, ノルウェー, フィンランド, フランス, ベルギー, ポルトガル, ポーランド さらに5件 ## 機能 - API - グラフィカル・ユーザーインタフェース - デバッグ - 互換性テスト - 統合型開発環境 ## サポートのオプション - チャット対応有 ## Category - [アプリ開発ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## 代替製品 1. [IntelliJ IDEA](https://www.capterra.jp/software/136010/intellij-idea) — 4.7/5 (1256 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.jp/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15312 reviews) 3. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.jp/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6155 reviews) 4. [Essential Studio](https://www.capterra.jp/software/32602/essential-studio) — 4.5/5 (903 reviews) 5. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.capterra.jp/software/101288/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3004 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Sencha controls are good for large applications with less time and more features required." — 4.0/5 > **Saurav** | *2018年7月3日* > > **良いポイント**: Sencha provides with rich UI components covering all major functionalities e.g in sencha grid we have been provided with grouping, sorting, pivoting, filter, buffering etc features. There is less effort required from developer just needs to understand configs and apply it as per requirement. Another fascinating feature is its cross browser compatibility which makes it easy to use it in any browser. > > **改善点**: Too expensive comparing to some other controls available in the market.There is not much support on internet for sencha - EXT JS 6.5.Customer support is not much effective too. Sencha grids with large number of columns are slow. No row spanning feature in sencha grids. ----- ### "Fantastic for grid-heavy business applications" — 5.0/5 > **Richard** | *2025年8月26日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Excellent framework with unparalleled grid functionality and a "one-stop shop" for developers of complex B2B business web apps who need a range of forms, grids, charts, calendars etc. in their apps. > > **改善点**: Steep learning curve for new hires and not as popular as other (free to developer) UX frameworks such as React or Angular. But ExtJs provides more functionality for complex grid-heavy business apps like in accounting, or ERP or logistics, maybe the $5K/developer up-front cost well worth it. > > Very good. Never needed support as there is plenty of online documentation including excellent documentation by Sencha. ----- ### "Built Strong, Maintained Weakly" — 2.0/5 > **Alessandro** | *2025年8月27日* | プログラム開発 | おすすめ評価：7.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: product was and remain a robust framework with complete group of object to manage/create a web business application. > > **改善点**: Customer support is inadequate. Tickets rarely receive thorough investigation, and the burden of proof falls on the reporter—who can spend weeks reproducing and documenting issues. Development also seems stalled: releases now arrive annually, whereas they used to be monthly > > After 10 years of development, we have no choice, we have to continue... or we have to rewrite everything ----- ### "End result is good, but high developer learning curve" — 4.0/5 > **Eric** | *2025年8月26日* | 高等教育 | おすすめ評価：3.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Works well in major browsers. High quality ui for administration panels. Not mobile-friendly, but thats not a requirement for us. > > **改善点**: High developer learning curve. Slow build process with java (error messages shown that according to support should be ignored). Documentation could be better. License pricing is very high. Large json/js arrays with the code can be problematic to work in. > > Quite good but developer learning curve would make us unlikely to adopt it in new projects. End result is good, but high developer learning curve. ----- ### "Very good product, despite a few pain points." — 4.0/5 > **Will** | *2025年5月7日* | 公共施設 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: - MVC paradigm - built in UI themes and ability to bring our own easily - politeness with other runtime packages (D3, etc.) - comprehensive reference docs > > **改善点**: - Design of Ext means that Sencha Test is really required to have good Selenium-style tests. - Difficult to work with individual grid cells, rows, columns; whether addressing, getting, formatting or setting values. - Licensing related bug in Sencha cloud. We have two licenses per team member (Ext and Sencha Test). NPM registry only sees Ext license, so we cannot access Sencha Test packages. - We cannot get the sts executable to work at all on Windows 11. Funny exceptions. - At times there seems to be no way to do something that should be easy. Hard to describe precisely. A solution is always eventually found but not always elegant and sometimes only after painful trial and error. For example enabling/disabling UI actions based on form validation formulas. - Need more maturity on date/time handling. Ext.Date type does not properly support Olson time zones, and serialization for backend integration is a constant headache. > > Overall positive, saves a lot of time versus starting with just Bootstrap and jQuery. MVC paradigm helps with app design - if you use it as intended. ----- ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/148124/sencha-platform?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/148124/sencha-platform) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## 構造化データ