--- description: IBM Targetprocessを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: IBM Targetprocessとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [PPMツール](/directory/30862/project-portfolio-management/software) > [IBM Targetprocess](/software/147228/targetprocess) # IBM Targetprocess Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/147228/targetprocess ページ：1 / 23\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/147228/targetprocess?page=2) > Targetprocessは、企業のアジャイル導入およびスケーラビリティをサポートする視覚的なプラットフォームです。 > > 評価：544人のユーザーによる評価は**4.5/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### IBM Targetprocessの対象ユーザー Targetprocessは中規模および大規模の企業に最適です。金融および石油ガス業界のITおよび非ITプロジェクトを効果的に管理するために使用できます。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.5/5** | 544 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.0/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: IBM ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格モデル**: (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ）, Windows（オンプレミス）, Linux（オンプレミス）, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: スペイン語, ドイツ語, フランス語, ポルトガル語, ロシア語, 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アメリカ合衆国, イギリス, インド, オーストラリア, カナダ, キプロス, スイス, スペイン, ドイツ, フランス, ブラジル, ベルギー, 日本 ## 機能 - KPIモニタリング - Real-Time Updates - Third-Party Integrations - アイデア管理 - アンケートおよびフィードバック - カンバンボード - ガントチャート、タイムラインビュー - コミュニケーション管理 - コラボレーションツール - ステータス追跡 - スプリント計画 - タイムシート管理 - タスク管理 - ダッシュボード - ダッシュボードのカスタマイズ - テンプレート管理 - バックログ管理 - プロジェクト管理 - プロジェクト計画 - マイルストーン追跡 - リソース管理 - リリース計画 - レポート／分析 - ワークフロー管理 - 予算設定、予測 - 予算運用 - 事業予測 - 優先順位付け - 報告、プロジェクト追跡 - 変更管理 - 戦略的計画 - 時間・支出追跡 - 目標管理 - 製品ロードマッピング - 複数プロジェクト - 要件管理 - 視覚化 - 課題管理 - 進捗の追跡 ## 統合 (合計17件) - Azure DevOps Server - Bugzilla - Coverity - Dynatrace - GitHub - GitLab - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Visual Studio - Miro - Okta - Phabricator - ServiceNow - Tableau ... さらに2件の統合 ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート - チャット対応有 ## Category - [PPMツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30862/project-portfolio-management/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [PPMツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30862/project-portfolio-management/software) - [ロードマップ作成ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30864/product-roadmap/software) - [製品管理システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30865/product-management/software) - [ITプロジェクト管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30952/it-project-management/software) - [アジャイルプロジェクト管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31556/agile-project-management-tools/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Jira](https://www.capterra.jp/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15371 reviews) 2. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.jp/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2994 reviews) 3. [Trello](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23533 reviews) 4. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.jp/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6037 reviews) 5. [Asana](https://www.capterra.jp/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13574 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Better than all the rest" — 4.0/5 > **Joel** | *2015年11月5日* | コンピュータ・ソフトウェア > > **良いポイント**: + Easy to use + Incredible customization available + Rich, feature-packed filtering query language > > **改善点**: What I dislike the most is that the experience isn't consistent - some data types can be created, renamed and tweaked extensively, while some others are set in stone and baked into the system. I would rather have that it was very scaled down, and that you could create your own data types for cards, instead of having a few baked-in types (Epic, Feature, UserStory, Request, Bug etc). And the cards are tied to metadata such as Release, Project, User, Role, Effort etc - these cannot be modified and you cannot use them as you will. - Cannot rename card types or create more, delete unused types etc - You have to choose between points or hours as Effort metric - but they don't work the same\! Some features are not available when you choose points instead of hours. I'd rather it was only a label choosing "p" instead of "h". - Multiple stuff like the above - some stuff is build-in and cant be changed and it can be very confusing. - API is a mess. Everything can be modified in every request, instead of having separate requests for midifying different objects. For instance: you add a comment to a bug, you have to include the user (as an object, not just an id) that authored the comment. However, if you accidentally input the wrong name for the user (but the correct ID), it will actually \*change the name\* of that user. WTF? - Query language is very useful, but has some subtle bugs and inconsistencies. > > Targetprocess re-invents the workflow board, sort of like combining Trello and full-featured issue trackers and project management systems. The way it lets you create different view to slice the data and drag\&drop between grids to change properites of the cards is amazing. We can customize the app to fit our workflow in a way that is not possible with most other tools. This is much better than having to customize your workflow to fit the app. ----- ### "Loaded with Features, Fast, Smooth, and get the job done" — 5.0/5 > **Imad** | *2016年3月9日* | デザイン > > **良いポイント**: amazing support, responsive and almost immediate problem solving. Live Chat sessions with their support are always fruitful, most of the times, 3 minutes into the session, the questions Is answered. TP team provide support for technical issues, and help you get things done with TP (in cases where you are not able to figure things out on your own) The product is very easy to use, no training needed. Team members can just get things done without TP getting in the way. The new features and development cycle is great, and they kept the software fast, reliable with no noticeable bugs. I am using TP since 2007, and I have carried it over with me to two companies, suggested it to my colleagues, and I continuously use it. They have the most friendly and responsive, and knowledgeable team. > > **改善点**: I cannot keep up with the new features. (maybe this is a positive). it doesn't work well with IE 11. I am working on Microsoft Edge now, and I doesn't work as good as expected. They have great performance on Chrome and Firefox. need more support for Microsoft products. > > Project Manager, previously worked in Quality Assurance, and Process improvement. I used using TP in two different companies, the first one as a user, and in the second,I deployed it, configured it and provided the need training. Software development, consultancy projects. Perfect tool to use The product is very easy to use, no training needed. Team members can just get things done without TP getting in the way. I am using TP since 2007, and I have carried it over with me to two companies, suggested it to my colleagues, and I continuously use it. They have the most friendly and responsive, and knowledgeable team. ----- ### "TargetProcess is just ok" — 3.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2018年11月27日* | インターネット | おすすめ評価：5.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Was easy enough to enter in task items for making stories > > **改善点**: It did not seem robust enough to be able to conform to how we really wanted it to work. And sometimes the lag between adding something or modifying something and seeing the change was just too much ----- ### "TargetProcess" — 4.0/5 > **Rajan** | *2018年9月23日* | コンピュータ・ゲーム | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: TargetProcess is a cloud-based project management tool that is being continuously improved with new features. It can be configured to use a number of different workflows and has very customizable ways to view your project's work so different roles can find the views that work best for them. > > **改善点**: The biggest complaint that I've heard voiced about TargetProcess is that it's cutomizability can make it easy to lose entities. For example, if you're working on an Agile project and have an epic, feature, story, task breakdown with releases and sprints, you can set up a view that shows all items related to a feature and in a release but when you add a new item the new item will only inherit some of the properties of that view and in some circumstances will disappear immediately. TargetProcess have added a list of recent changes though which makes finding that entity easy but it is a pain as you have to set up views to find lost entities to keep the project tidy. ----- ### "Hard to grasp at the beginning but very powerful" — 5.0/5 > **José Luis** | *2021年4月27日* | コンピュータ・ソフトウェア | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: It's by far one of the best tools in terms of project reporting. There is a large number of configurations to show project stats in different dimensions such as tasks per user, items arranged by iteration, inter dependencies among tasks, just to name a few of the ones I use. > > **改善点**: Coming fro a project using Jira, it was a bit to understand at the beginning and creating reports it's not a trivial task at all like in other tools. This gets compensated by the variety of reports available. > > It has been a good experience. I was not very fond of the tool at first but it's definitely worth learning how to tweak. ----- ページ：1 / 23\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/147228/targetprocess?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/147228/targetprocess) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## 構造化データ