--- description: Mendを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Mendとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [アプリ開発ツール](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [Mend](/software/146730/whitesource) # Mend Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/146730/whitesource ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/146730/whitesource?page=2) > オープンソース・ライブラリでセキュリティおよびコンプライアンスの問題をリアルタイムで修正することができます。 > > 評価：8人のユーザーによる評価は**4.4/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Mendの対象ユーザー ソフトウェア・チーム、セキュリティ・チーム、DevOpsチーム、およびソフトウェア・アプリケーション開発企業にとって役立つソリューションです。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.4/5** | 8 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.0/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 3.8/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 70% | (7/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: WhiteSource Software - **設立**: 2010 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $4,000.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ）, Linux（デスクトップ）, Android（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: ドイツ語, フランス語, ヘブライ語, 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アメリカ合衆国, イギリス, イスラエル, インド, オーストラリア, カナダ, ドイツ, 中国, 日本 ## 機能 - API - Real-Time Monitoring - アクセス制御・許可 - アラート／通知 - エンドポイント保護 - グラフィカル・ユーザーインタフェース - コラボレーションツール - コンテナのスキャニング - コンプライアンス管理 - コンプライアンス追跡 - ダッシュボード - トライアル・ライセンス - パッチ管理 - ポリシー管理 - ライセンス・インベントリ - ライセンス追跡 - ランタイム・コンテナ・セキュリティ - リリース管理 - レポート／分析 - 優先順位付け - 継続的インテグレーション - 脆弱性診断 - 脆弱性評価 ## 統合 (合計9件) - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cloudbees CI - Docker - GitHub - GitLab - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Travis CI ## サポートのオプション - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート ## Category - [アプリ開発ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [アプリ開発ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [コンテナセキュリティソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/32916/container-security/software) - [ALMツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) - [脆弱性管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31062/vulnerability-management/software) - [PCIコンプライアンス ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31127/pci-compliance/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Cloudflare](https://www.capterra.jp/software/155191/cloudflare) — 4.7/5 (519 reviews) 2. [AVG Antivirus Business Edition](https://www.capterra.jp/software/176245/avg-antivirus-business-edition) — 4.3/5 (2145 reviews) 3. [ESET Endpoint Security](https://www.capterra.jp/software/151915/eset-endpoint-security) — 4.7/5 (1169 reviews) 4. [SentinelOne](https://www.capterra.jp/software/152564/endpoint-protection-platform) — 4.8/5 (113 reviews) 5. [Splunk Enterprise](https://www.capterra.jp/software/94317/splunk) — 4.6/5 (262 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Good supplement to other SAST tools for "shift left" security." — 4.0/5 > **Mo** | *2022年12月7日* | 法律サービス | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Easy integration with Azure DevOps and Mend for Github and the fact that you can run as a task during the pipeline but you don't have to see the output from a CLI since they provide a tab on the pipeline run to see a good report on used libraries and vulnerabilities. > > **改善点**: Other tools have auto fixing which is not a need but good to have. Auto-fixing is not always "auto" and might need review which doesn't make it a big con. ----- ### "Best Unified solution for SCA,SAST & Container on the market." — 5.0/5 > **Sonal** | *2025年6月25日* | 物流、サプライチェーン | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Best Open Source analysis with their In-house and other multiple sources of software vulnerabilities giving you value for money for your subscription. Also one of the few companies in the market which will give you license \& policy violations alert as well. Pipeline integration of this tools is greatly helpful for the software which are shipped out securely \& safely. > > **改善点**: Mend SAST tool gives remediation as a general one or two liners, they are pointing as to where the issue is present, but also need to provide detailed fix for SAST issues. > > Overall a good experience working with WhiteSource team, even their Technical Accounts Manager (TAM) was able to troubleshoot issues on the call. It's better to keep a bi-weekly cadence with them as they do provide hands-on approach to issues raised and helps us in resolving any integration problems. ----- ### "Tons of false positives, prepare to spend hours fixing it manually" — 2.0/5 > **Don** | *2018年6月7日* | おすすめ評価：1.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Fast, quick reviews of your code. They do a good job of putting all the relevant reports and dashboards in front of you quickly. Once you manually fix everything, it can look really good. > > **改善点**: The false positives are awful. I had to spend hours and hours manually fixing everything it mis-identified - dozens of libraries and thousands of source files. If you use a library not in its database... too bad. You can make a support request and wait for them to enter it for you, whenever they get around to it. The search is pretty awful. There is some kind of syntax to using it but when I asked our account rep, she couldn't give me any documentation on it. You will frequently see results like "openssl-v0\_9\_8" in your search, but if you type "openssl" it will vanish and not come up. Don't ever both trying to search for a version, it doesn't work. This results in a lot of time scrolling through very large lists. Naming schemes are random and follow no established pattern. For a good half of all libraries, they have not assigned a license. Guess who gets to go google search them all? You, the user\! Isn't the point of this tool to help me identify the licensing? UI navigation is challenging. Back button will take you to a different place than you were almost every time. You'll love the dashboard... because you have to go back to it roughly every 5 minutes and start over. No great system for notes/todos/reminders. When you have to fix 60 libraries, it's hard to remember what you want to do with each one. > > After much manual configuration, a nicely formatted output that looks reputable. I could have just made my own in excel a lot faster. ----- ### "WhiteSource Review" — 5.0/5 > **Elyes** | *2021年12月7日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: WhiteSource give you the ability to scan open source packages within your source code. The ability to integrate it with Azure pipelines is a huge plus > > **改善点**: Duplicated result for same packages and within the same project ----- ### "FOSS lifecycle management with Whitesource" — 5.0/5 > **Udi** | *2015年11月10日* > > Using Whitesource to manage the process of analysing FOSS for a large product with hundreds of opensource dependencies. Makes life much easier and helps you cover all dependencies much more accurately. Some processes are still a bit course (though improved dramatically over the past 18 months) Refresh performance might be a bit slow when there are very large dependency lists. Best product out there for FOSS lifecycle management ----- ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/146730/whitesource?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/146730/whitesource) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | ja | | ----- ## 構造化データ