キャプテラ - 日本企業の最適な
ソフトウェア選びをサポートし17年

UpKeepとは?

Upkeepは、運用を効率的かつ効果的に実行するために必要なツールや情報をメンテナンスおよび信頼性チームに提供することで、企業の規模拡大を支援する資産運用管理ソリューションです。

UpKeepは、作業指示、資産、メンテナンスを効率的に管理し、迅速な解決を実現する中央コマンド・センターを提供します。UpKeepを使用すると、ユーザーは、すべての技術者があらゆるサービスとサポートを遂行するための1つの玄関口を作成することができます。

UpKeepの対象ユーザー

製造、産業機械、農業、食品加工、施設管理、車両、ホテル、石油・ガス、建設、流通、倉庫保管、公益事業、パッケージング。

UpKeepソフトウェア - 1
UpKeepソフトウェア - 2
UpKeepソフトウェア - 3
UpKeepソフトウェア - 4
UpKeepソフトウェア - 5

UpKeepをご存知でしょうか? 別の人気製品との比較

UpKeep

UpKeep

4.6 (1,336)
$45.00
無料バージョン
無料トライアル
181
24
4.6 (1,336)
4.5 (1,336)
4.7 (1,336)
VS.
価格プラン
価格オプション
機能
連携サービス
使いやすさ
価格の妥当性
カスタマーサービス
¥1,475
無料バージョン
無料トライアル
236
92
4.4 (12,930)
4.4 (12,930)
4.3 (12,930)
緑色の評価バーは、平均評価とレビュー数に基づいて高評価の製品を表しています。

UpKeepの他のおすすめ代替製品

Asana
高評価の機能
タスク管理
プロジェクト管理
プロジェクト計画/スケジューリング
eMaint CMMS
高評価の機能
予防メンテナンス
作業発注管理
資産追跡
Dynamics 365
高評価の機能
レポート/分析
請求書作成
連絡先データベース
MicroMain
高評価の機能
モバイル・アクセス
予防メンテナンス
作業発注作成
MEX Maintenance
高評価の機能
メンテナンスのスケジューリング
予防メンテナンス
作業発注管理
MaintainX
高評価の機能
モバイル・アクセス
予防メンテナンス
作業発注管理
mHelpDesk
高評価の機能
カレンダー管理
モバイル・アクセス
従業員スケジューリング
Fiix
高評価の機能
スケジューリング
予防メンテナンス
作業発注管理
Synchroteam
高評価の機能
サービス履歴
スケジューリング
モバイル・アクセス

UpKeepの評判・レビュー

評価ポイント

総合評価
4.6
使いやすさ
4.6
カスタマーサービス
4.7
機能
4.4
価格の妥当性
4.5

企業規模(従業員数)別レビュー数

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1,000
  • >1,001
Michael
Architect
認証済みLinkedInユーザー
建築、設計, 2~10人規模の会社
使用期間: 1年以上
投稿経路

UpKeep is FANTASTIC!

4.0 4 年前
動画プレイヤーで日本語字幕を表示できます
Dirk
Dirk
アメリカのDirector of Operations
認証済みLinkedInユーザー
不動産, 11~50人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

検討した類似製品:

Crucial Team Management

5.0 5 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: This creates the foundation for extensive maintenance records, historical tracking of problems, inventory, and more. It allows you to monitor your entire portfolio on a macro and micro level.

良いポイント:

Functionality. This cloud-based task manager functions at the level that works for you. Whether you're assigning basic tasks at a complex you own and manage or inspecting individually tagged pieces of hardware this is essential. The accountability from a required signature showing this task has been done is reassuring. Should there be a hang-up or question UpKeep's customer service is there to help you through it.

改善してほしい点:

The initial challenge is determining the depth at which to utilize this software most effectively. Whenever an organization chooses to go with a task manager, it is only effective as the degree to which your staff buys into it.

UpKeep Technologiesからの返信

5 年前

Hi Dirk, Thank you for taking the time to leave a review for UpKeep! We're so happy to hear that UpKeep is serving your team for tasks and projects big & small. The fact that the signature feature has provided a layer of accountability for your team is amazing! We're glad that the ability to historically track your work at a micro and macro level is helping you take the team to the next level. If you ever do need assistance in developing your maintenance program using UpKeep, feel free to reach out to your dedicated Customer Success Manager. Our team will follow up with you to connect your team to this dedicated resource. Thank you again for leaving us a great review. We really do take and appreciate your feedback seriously!

Rick
アメリカのFacility Manager
宗教団体, 51~200人規模の会社
使用期間: 無料トライアル
投稿経路
ソース:SoftwareAdvice

Perfect CMMS for my Needs

5.0 4 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: Using Upkeep has been an easy process, and it helps keep everything in one place. I also like the fact that our Operations Manager sees everything that I do, from creation of work orders, to updates, and completion of work orders.

良いポイント:

The free features are perfect for my use. My day is all about work orders, and being able to manage these work orders easily makes my day easier. We used to use paper work orders, which I had to fill out, file, and then track in another file. I would then need to create a separate report to send to the property team for review. I like having the ability to have everything in one place, without having to create so many separate reports.

改善してほしい点:

Nothing about this software is difficult to use. I do wish more was offered in the free version, such as reporting. I was able to use it during the free trial, but now am using the free version, in which reporting is only available in paid versions. I understand that this is how the company makes money, and I will be making the switch to a paid version when it is approved in our new budget. One thing that bugs me and hope gets fixed, is during the work order creation. I have over 120 locations and sub-locations. When I create a work order and choose the location, you should be able to begin typing the location in the box and it should self-populate the box. Right now, only the main locations will self-populate, not the sub-locations. I only have three main locations, and all the rest are sub-locations, so I have to scroll to search for the exact location I need. It's nothing major, but just an annoyance, and I hope this will be fixed soon so that any location will self-populate the box when you begin typing it.

Susan
オーストラリアのProject Manager
建築、設計, 51~200人規模の会社
使用期間: 2年以上
投稿経路

A Great Maintenance Management Solution

4.0 2 週間前 新着

良いポイント:

UpKeep has been helpful when it comes to streamlining work order. It comes with great asset tracking and management features

改善してほしい点:

Well, UpKeep has not failed us. It always delivers.

Nolan
アメリカのBuyer
環境サービス, 51~200人規模の会社
使用期間: 1年以上
投稿経路

Work orders works well on mobile app.

2.0 9 か月前

製品を使ってみた感想: We began using Upkeep in 2021 at the start up of our new company. Our asset list includes over 300 units, 165 of them needing regular preventative maintenance. From the beginning, the approximate monthly user license fee near $100 seemed high, but not for a system that was sold to us as an all-encompassing platform. As it turns out, Upkeep fell far short of that level. We began using Upkeep prior to the preventative maintenance module roll out they use now, and right away we found that recurring work orders were not populating correctly, most notably re-using work order numbers (which should be unique), and not populating at the correct time. This was mostly solved when the PM roll out took place in 2022, but the amount of labor time on our end to correct this recurring work order problem was excessive to say the least. Tech support was very limited, in that they were only able to train in how to use the new module. It didn’t help that when they migrated away from recurring work orders to PM, the functionality ceased on all our existing work orders. Many of our assets had several months of missed maintenance due to this as we frantically tried to catch up. The PM module still took over a year to establish a working capability, with many bugs found and long delays for fixes. The work order function still worked very well, especially for the technicians using the mobile app. Aside from always requiring an internet connection. It took some time, but we were able to manipulate the software to sort work orders correctly. Purchase orders and parts brought around a host of new problems. The first, and most noteworthy, is that our accounting department, who only required viewing of PO’s that are in the system, required an administrator’s license. This took one of the very expensive licenses away from a technician for a user that didn’t need full unfettered access. In addition, there were no custom security variations that wouldn’t require a full license to simply view purchase order data. Regarding purchasing, inventory control and cost appropriations, it is important to note that to change the pricing of an individual item in Upkeep, one must update the part in their parts/inventory module. There is no function in a working PO that allows for updating of current price. This has two problems. First, as prices fluctuate from vendor to vendor and day to day, an updated last cost is very important. Second, when updating the price in Upkeep’s Parts module, the cost would update all work and purchase orders from the past, thereby adjusting overall costs of every PO, some of which were not due, and making them no longer match invoices to be paid. This also brings up a purchasing question that if costs are not available to be averaged, then a buyer cannot accurately predict and anticipate cost increases and make bottom line dollar saving decisions. Among these issues with parts and POs was the fact that vendor assignments are a secondary thought, taking a distant 6th position to “PO Title”, “Description”, and “Category” among other less important references. These problems truly spoke of a company and designers that had never used a proper purchase order or items/parts inventory control system. These concerns were not rectified by the time we changed software in August 2023. I don’t want to sound completely disparaged by Upkeep. Like I said before, the work order mobile app is very easy to use, and the learning curve is very shallow. Tech support always left something to be desired as well as we were presented with “workarounds” rather than solutions on a regular basis. Our annual “check-in” was with our original salesman, who was more interested in the analytics of how we paid our bill than how the software worked. When said salesman left the company, it took nearly three months to get a new account representative. When we upgraded this year to another company (which will not be named) we got all the features of Upkeep and so much more, for half the price. I wish all the best to Upkeep and all their employees, but I would not recommend this software.

良いポイント:

Ease of use by technicians (mobile app), preventative maintenance scheduling was very robust.

改善してほしい点:

Overall sluggish UI, cloud based requirements (little to no “offline” mode), limited search parameters, limited locations and tracking, lack of aggregate or average cost on items, no PO look up in parts browser, part categories are allowed to be random, no PO dates assigned (unless manually entered and manipulated), limited purchase history, pricing updates are updated on fulfilled purchase and work orders, can only use “inventory adjustments” to remove items outside of work orders, can use the same function to add inventory without PO, lack of PO approval process for management, PO view only available on administrator level security access, lack of internal messaging system.

manju
アメリカのDirector of Maintenance
美術館、博物館, 201~500人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Comprehensive Solution for Maintenance Management

5.0 2 か月前

製品を使ってみた感想: Overall, UpKeep is a solid choice for maintenance management. However, if you're exploring alternatives, you might find https://QByte.ai to offer enhanced capabilities and a more competitive pricing structure.

良いポイント:

UpKeep offers a robust set of features that streamline maintenance management effectively. The user interface is intuitive, and the mobile app is particularly useful for on-the-go updates. The work order management and asset tracking functionalities are standout features, making it easy to keep everything organized.

改善してほしい点:

While UpKeep is comprehensive, it can be a bit overwhelming for new users to navigate initially. The pricing is also on the higher side compared to some other solutions.