--- description: ReqViewを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ReqViewとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [要件管理ツール](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [ReqView](/software/145388/reqview) # ReqView Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/145388/reqview ページ：1 / 3\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/145388/reqview?page=2) > 規制産業で活動するユーザー用に開発されたソフトウェアおよびシステム要件管理ツールです。システム・エンジニアリング基準に準拠するための管理業務を支援します。 > > 評価：49人のユーザーによる評価は**4.6/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### ReqViewの対象ユーザー 要件の重要性が高いシーンにおけるソフトウェアおよびシステムの要件管理を支援します。ReqViewは、重要保安基準への準拠を達成する業務を支援できるため、規制産業のユーザーから信頼されています。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.6/5** | 49 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.9/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.8/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.1/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Eccam - **設立**: 2004 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: €430.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ）, Linux（デスクトップ）, Windows（オンプレミス）, Linux（オンプレミス） - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アメリカ合衆国, イギリス, インド, オーストラリア, カナダ, チェコ, ドイツ, ブラジル, メキシコ, 中国, 日本 ## 機能 - コンプライアンス管理 - 優先順位付け - 変更管理 ## 統合 (合計11件) - Apache Subversion - Bitbucket - Enterprise Architect - GitHub - GitLab - IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS - Jira - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Word - Polarion REQUIREMENTS - Windchill ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - チャット対応有 ## Category - [要件管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [要件管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) - [IT管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10001/it-management/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.jp/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3663 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.jp/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15314 reviews) 3. [Aha\!](https://www.capterra.jp/software/144020/aha) — 4.7/5 (561 reviews) 4. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.jp/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2887 reviews) 5. [Zoho Projects](https://www.capterra.jp/software/169455/zoho-projects) — 4.5/5 (857 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Try ReqView\!" — 5.0/5 > **Benjamin** | *2025年8月25日* | デザイン | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Helpful to organize reqs, risks and other stuff. Straightforward setup and customizable. Good options. Great for smaller organizations that can't afford a huge IT overhead and maintenance for more complex products. > > **改善点**: Minimal free access for other users. Main issue is commenting. Need to be able to have a large number of users have access to leave comments. This would be really helpful. Also - simultaneous access for comments (at least leaving their own, not deleting or responding). Other small issues - slow loading and unlocking, could be easier to copy paste cells into other rows/requirements (especially tracing links). > > It has been good. They are responsive to requests, add features we ask for overtime, and it helps us collaborate. It will only get better I think. I would recommend to any small to medium org that needs a simple tracing/req/risk management systems. Massively better than Excel or other handcrafted systems. ----- ### "Lightweight and Capable Requirements Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Tolgahan** | *2025年8月7日* | 航空宇宙産業 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: ReqView is very lightweight and fast to use. UI feels modern and fresh and very intuitive. Recently added scaling options make reading on high DPI screens very comfortable. > > **改善点**: No out-of box solution for traceability link coherence/baselining if the linked documents are split into multiple git repositories. > > We are using ReqView as a replacement to Doors Classic. While it is not (yet) a drop in replacement due to some missing functionality, ReqView was flexible enough to let us integrate it into our workflow. Customer support is stellar, they are very responsive, friendly and do their best to find solutions for reported issues. Dev team also seem very capable solving reported issues in a timely manner. ----- ### "Good value for money with great support but still some work to be done on the tool" — 4.0/5 > **Nazar** | *2026年3月5日* | 航空会社/航空産業 | おすすめ評価：7.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Very fast responses from the support team with actual helpful advices. The software is very custom and anyone can tailor it to their needs instead of trying to fit in into the existing framework. Clear roadmap of features to be introduced, the product is constantly improving. It is a good value for money, though. > > **改善点**: There are some features for collaboration that are missing, which prevent us from multiple people using the tool at its maximum capacity ----- ### "Review by Albert" — 3.0/5 > **Albert** | *2022年11月4日* | 鉄道製造 | おすすめ評価：7.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The capability to make traceability between documents and projects in a very efficient way. > > **改善点**: The most critical of the SW to me is the 'CNTRl+Z' command does not exist. ----- ### "Loaded with features for a very reasonable price" — 5.0/5 > **Alexandre** | *2024年12月12日* | 航空宇宙産業 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The company enhance the product based on user's feedback and needs. The tool is lightweight, no brainer to deploy and maintain. Easy integration with Jira or other tools. The support I received was excellent. Different flexible types of licensing. Affordable. Round trip update from Jira\! Possible to work with distributed teams/tiers (document exchange). > > **改善点**: Indentation when moving requirements across section could be difficult, but with practice it is easier. > > User since 2020 something. Worked in the past with IBM/Jama/R4J (...) and I have to hard time finding out what ReqView is missing compared to those tools, given my experience is mainly in stringent domains (Aero/military). ----- ページ：1 / 3\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/145388/reqview?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/145388/reqview) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## 構造化データ