--- description: SiteDocsを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: SiteDocsとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [EHSシステム](/directory/10015/ehs-management/software) > [SiteDocs](/software/143579/sitedocs) # SiteDocs Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/143579/sitedocs ページ：1 / 11\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/143579/sitedocs?page=2) > 現場のモバイル・デバイスで、安全対策フォームとドキュメントへの入力を完了することができます。オンラインにログインして、安全対策活動を追跡およびモニタリングすることができます。 > > 評価：241人のユーザーによる評価は**4.8/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### SiteDocsの対象ユーザー 建設、石油・ガス、鉱業、製造、機械、電気、配管、暖房、掘削、重建設など。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.8/5** | 241 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.8/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.8/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.7/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.5/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: SiteDocs - **ロケーション**: Abbotsford, カナダ - **設立**: 2012 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **対象となる企業**: 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: スペイン語, フランス語, 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アメリカ合衆国, イギリス, インド, オーストラリア, カナダ, ドイツ, ニュージーランド, バミューダ, フィジー, ブラジル, メキシコ, 中国, 日本 ## 機能 - OSHA記録保持 - Third-Party Integrations - アクセス制御・許可 - アラート／通知 - インシデント・レポート - インシデント管理 - コンプライアンス管理 - コンプライアンス追跡 - ステータス追跡 - タスク管理 - ダッシュボード - ドキュメント管理 - バージョン管理 - フォームのカスタマイズ - フォーム作成・デザイン - フォーム管理 - プロセス／ワークフロー自動化 - モニタリング - リスク・マネジメント - リスク評価 - レポートと統計 - ワークフロー管理 - 不適合追跡 - 品質管理 - 変更管理 - 契約者データベース - 是正措置・予防措置 (CAPA) - 根本原因解析 - 点検管理 - 監査管理 - 監査計画 - 監査証跡 - 達成、リテンション ## 統合 (合計22件) - Airtable - Asana - BambooHR - Clockify - Cloud Signage for Google Drive - Dropbox Business - Egnyte - Factorial - Gmail - Google Docs - Google Drive - Google Sheets - Google Slides - Harvest - LinkedIn Jobs ... さらに7件の統合 ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート ## Category - [EHSシステム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10015/ehs-management/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [EHSシステム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10015/ehs-management/software) - [請負業者管理ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30853/contractor-management/software) - [フォーム自動化ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10023/forms-automation/software) - [CAPAシステム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31343/corrective-and-preventive-action/software) - [インシデント管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31332/incident-management/software) ## 代替製品 1. [SafetyCulture](https://www.capterra.jp/software/141080/iauditor) — 4.6/5 (253 reviews) 2. [EHS Insight](https://www.capterra.jp/software/101454/ehs-management-software) — 4.4/5 (59 reviews) 3. [VelocityEHS](https://www.capterra.jp/software/119952/ehs-management-software) — 4.4/5 (85 reviews) 4. [Cority](https://www.capterra.jp/software/102848/ehs-management-software) — 4.4/5 (107 reviews) 5. [HSI Donesafe](https://www.capterra.jp/software/141558/donesafe) — 4.7/5 (80 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Simplify your OHS Management System" — 5.0/5 > **Richard** | *2022年5月17日* | 石油、エネルギー | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Templates for all of the major components of our OHMS such as: - Toolbox Talks Incident reporting and investigation Inspections of sites and equipment Accident investigations Risk Assessments Employee Certifications Analysis of stats > > **改善点**: It would be great if the system could alert you (instant message/email) when someone has assigned a corrective action to you. > > 3 years ago our company set up and began to implement a Safety Management System (OHMS) so that we could achieve COR certification with WorkSafe BC. Early on in the process, we realized that we would need a way to provide two-way communication with our workers (most of whom work remotely from our office locations) and also to record safety-related information relevant to our OHMS. Rather than try to create such a system we looked at several online, cloud-based options that could do the job for us with little or no set-up time and effort involved. Site Docs fit the bill perfectly. The templates that were immediately available to us for such things as incident reporting and investigation, site inspections, equipment inspections, risk assessments and toolbox talks enabled us to get up and running with our system quickly, efficiently and in a way that was easy for our field staff to understand and adopt into their daily work patterns. The system worked so well for us that we achieved our goal of COR certification in record time thanks, in no small part, to the ease with which our auditors were able to see our records. There is no doubt that the adoption of Site Docs into our OHMS has made us a more proactive company with respect to Safety and has helped encourage a much better safety culture among our employees. The numbers don't lie. Our rates of incidents and near misses have dramatically decreased resulting in a safer work environment and lower WCB premiums. ----- ### "Great System\! have recommended to others" — 4.0/5 > **Corey** | *2025年8月12日* | 建設 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The custom forms, my company has several branches that range from commercial to industrial, and the forms can't be the same. However with the customizable forms, users can navigate to applicable portions using dropdowns. I have a range of employees from 20 to 60 year old workers, all found the program easy to use and simple. I also had an audit recently and the auditor was able to log into our archive and perform the audit on documentation easily, saved a pile of time. > > **改善点**: Not much to complain about, I suppose I have mentioned this to the engineering team a few times, but when signing the form, you have the opportunity to choose anyone on/off site, so I could sign off as the CEO if I wanted. An additional layer of security is lacking there. > > Overall its been great\! there are lots of companies out there that are growing this type of system, and all seem to be holding SiteDocs as their main goal to beat, which isn't a bad thing\! Holding SiteDocs as the standard should be an achievement to the team. ----- ### "Sitedocs is a simple doccumentation platform" — 3.0/5 > **Trevor** | *2025年10月8日* | 建設 | おすすめ評価：6.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Site-docs was easy to use and had a good interface. Some features I miss compared to other platforms are repeatable segments and common lists. It was extremely easy to pull and review documents for things like audits or to send to customers. > > **改善点**: The features and abilities were limited. For example while there were sections where workers could upload certificates but no ability to track outstanding certificate renewals and training matrix requirements, site analytics were not helpful in gaining insights or tracking requirements. Tracking and completing tasks created by sitedocs forms was not easy and was not able to work for us in tracking deficiency reports on equipment. > > Site docs was an adequate platform, they were about mid on value for cost (some are better some are worse), and while I prefer another platform I can see some people finding it to be ideal. Specifically if the user(s) administrating it have a low technical ability on computers or only want the simple features that it offers (no "if" functions or calculations, limited specific notifications or task assignments). The user interface makes navigating to documents forms and certifications very easy for end users in a way I haven't seen replicated as smoothly on other systems. ----- ### "HIGHLY RECOMMEND SITE DOCS" — 5.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2026年1月14日* | 建設 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Site Docs provides accurate, time saving, user friendly processes for our Safety Dept. The reporting allows us to determine risk and provide accountability to our executive team quickly. > > **改善点**: It's unlikely one would be able to jump in and use this program without going through an onboarding process, which is now provided easily. > > Excellent customer service. This company has gone above and beyond to customize our needs through analytics and their one on one interaction is amazing. ----- ### "SiteDoc Review" — 4.0/5 > **Alison** | *2025年7月29日* | 石油、エネルギー | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Easy for field workers to use, quick reporting, can make customization and allows file uploads from individuals phones and customer service > > **改善点**: Like most programs I think the costs could be broken down better into the user categories ranges. Is a good value, but I am always looking to lower costs. > > Ease of the program, forms are easy to build and sharing of reports automatically. No matter the level of computer skills, can be used easily, and works with all phone types. ----- ページ：1 / 11\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/143579/sitedocs?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/143579/sitedocs) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## 構造化データ