--- description: Onfleetを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Onfleetとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [配送ルート最適化ソフト](/directory/30944/route-planning/software) > [Onfleet](/software/142633/onfleet) # Onfleet Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/142633/onfleet ページ：1 / 5\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/142633/onfleet?page=2) > Onfleetのソフトウェアは、最終拠点から消費者までの配送業務を最初から最後まで強化します。今すぐ無料トライアルを開始してください。 > > 評価：96人のユーザーによる評価は**4.6/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Onfleetの対象ユーザー Onfleetの顧客は、多国籍の宅配業者、小売業者、流通業者からオンデマンドの配達スタートアップ企業まで多岐にわたります。お客様は、飲食品から小包、医薬品まで、あらゆるものを配送しています。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.6/5** | 96 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.5/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.5/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Onfleet - **ロケーション**: San Francisco, アメリカ - **設立**: 2012 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $599.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: アラビア語, スペイン語, ドイツ語, フランス語, ヘブライ語, ポーランド語, ロシア語, 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アイルランド, アゼルバイジャン, アフガニスタン, アメリカ合衆国, アラブ首長国連邦, アルゼンチン, アルバ, アルバニア, アルメニア, アンギラ, アンティグア・バーブーダ, アンドラ, イエメン, イギリス, イスラエル, イタリア, イラク, イラン, インド さらに153件 ## 機能 - GPS - Real-Time Updates - Third-Party Integrations - アラート／通知 - カスタマー管理 - スケジューリング - ステータス追跡 - ドライバーのライブ追跡 - ドライバー管理 - パフォーマンス測定基準 - モバイル・アクセス - モバイル署名キャプチャ - ルーティング - ルート最適化 - レポートと統計 - レポート／分析 - 従業員管理 - 注文管理 - 派遣管理 - 走行距離追跡 - 車両管理 - 配送追跡 - 配達追跡 - 顧客データベース ## 統合 (合計39件) - 2Ship - Aeropay - Airtable - Azuga Fleet - BLAZE - BloomNation - CARRIYO - Central No-Code Integration Platform - Dutchie - Enapps - Evermile - Flowhub - Flybuy - Google Docs - Google Sheets ... さらに24件の統合 ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート - チャット対応有 ## Category - [配送ルート最適化ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30944/route-planning/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [配送ルート最適化ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30944/route-planning/software) - [配送管理システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10046/courier/software) - [輸送派遣ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10048/transportation-dispatch/software) - [車両管理システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/20007/fleet-management/software) - [物流ソリューション](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30081/logistics/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Route4Me](https://www.capterra.jp/software/149633/route4me) — 4.5/5 (411 reviews) 2. [Tookan](https://www.capterra.jp/software/218952/tookan) — 4.1/5 (77 reviews) 3. [Detrack](https://www.capterra.jp/software/188592/detrack) — 4.7/5 (97 reviews) 4. [Motive](https://www.capterra.jp/software/138669/motive) — 4.5/5 (1688 reviews) 5. [Gofrugal](https://www.capterra.jp/software/71693/gofrugal-pos-software) — 4.4/5 (198 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Great software for warehouses/ trucks - yet to step up for on demand delivery use cases" — 4.0/5 > **Vinol Joy** | *2021年7月14日* | 物流、サプライチェーン | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: - It comes with driver apps for Android and iOS out of the box - Setup was quick and easy - SMS and live notifications very well integrated - Easy to use dispatch UI and drag and drop options - Transparent pricing - Amazing feature of multi brand support (especially when you scale) > > **改善点**: - Not the best for food delivery or on demand delivery services and there is no way to broadcast tasks and drivers to pick up tasks (Currently in beta but featureless) - Allows communication between drivers , caused us potential trouble of drivers ganging against us - No driver management of driver pay integrations - Route optimization is made for truck or warehouse deliveries and not like on-demand deliveries, Eg.If you need 50 drops from one pick up location it takes a lot of workarounds to optimize - Few downtimes of software when the entire communication went down since they were using twilio, sometimes route optimizations had issues > > Its an amazing software easy to use, best pricing model of pay as per use and scale as you go, wish it could support driver pay integrations, ability for drivers to self pick up task s(especially when they are linked pick up and drop -off) ----- ### "Exceeds the simplicity that competitors dont\!" — 5.0/5 > **Ashli** | *2021年6月28日* | 代替医療 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I absolutely love the simplicity that this platform provides. Optimized routing and the option to see where our fleet/drivers are in real time. The last feature that is very helpful is the eta text message. > > **改善点**: I liked the price point least, along with the way the scheduling auto-sets. It seems like it's a little redundant but it definitely still gets the job done. > > As a cannabis distribution company, it is extremely important to track fleet and drivers, route multiple deliveries and scheduling the most efficient routes since we are carrying expensive products that must be left in cold temps. We are able to track all our employees and more with OnFleet, and provide exact etas to brands that procure us to make their scheduled deliveries. Best most simplified delivery platform on the market. ----- ### "Poor Billing Governance and No Effective Control Over Payment Methods" — 1.0/5 > **Yael** | *2026年6月8日* | 物流、サプライチェーン | おすすめ評価：1.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The platform itself provides useful logistics and delivery management capabilities. Initial onboarding was straightforward and the product generally performed as expected when actively used. > > **改善点**: illing transparency and account governance were extremely disappointing. A payment method associated with me continued to be charged even though I was not the account owner and had no administrative access to billing settings, subscription management, or payment methods. When a different company payment method failed, charges reverted to my card without my knowledge and without any mechanism available to me to review or remove it. The account was inactive for months, yet billing continued. When I requested a refund for unused service, the request was denied despite the lack of recent platform usage. The overall process exposed serious concerns regarding billing controls, payment method management, and customer visibility over recurring charges. > > While the product itself is functional, my experience with account management and billing was extremely frustrating. The most concerning issue was discovering that I remained financially responsible for recurring charges while lacking the permissions necessary to manage the subscription or remove the payment method being charged. This created a situation where I had financial liability without corresponding account control. Customer support was responsive, but ultimately unwilling to provide a refund despite prolonged inactivity and legitimate concerns regarding payment management. I cannot recommend a platform where billing responsibility and account control can become disconnected in this way. ----- ### "Easy to use software" — 5.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2021年7月1日* | 食品、飲料 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The software has been reliable and just works. Delivery is a key part of our business and this software definitely helps us co-ordinate well with the drivers along with giving customers the opportunity to track their food. > > **改善点**: The time estimates are too pessimistic and overshoot actual driving times by at least 50%. > > The software has helped make the driver management and route tracking piece of our business a lot simpler. ----- ### "Centralized Data Management, But Slows Down with Heavy Filtering" — 4.0/5 > **Jimmy** | *2025年10月23日* | 物流、サプライチェーン | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: What I appreciate most is being able to manage a large amount of data in a single location, instead of having to search through various different sources. > > **改善点**: At times, the software can become slow, especially when multiple filters are applied simultaneously, which makes the overall experience less than ideal. > > This tool helps eliminate the need to search through multiple sources when analyzing data, making the process much more efficient. It also provides valuable historical data, which is especially useful when reviewing past scenarios in detail. ----- ページ：1 / 5\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/142633/onfleet?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/142633/onfleet) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## 構造化データ