キャプテラ - 企業の最適な
ソフトウェア選びをサポートし15年

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

JD Edwards EnterpriseOneとは?

プロジェクト管理、オーダー管理、商品追跡、サプライチェーン計画などでビジネスを支援する企業資源計画 (ERP) ソリューション。

JD Edwards EnterpriseOneの対象ユーザー

製造、食品・飲料、化粧品、石油・ガスなどの業界の企業が輸送、人的資本、不動産などを管理することができるERPソリューション。

JD Edwards EnterpriseOneをご存知でしょうか? 別の人気製品との比較

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

4.2 (157)
価格情報が見つかりません
無料バージョン
無料トライアル
66
連携サービスが見つかりません
3.8 (157)
3.9 (157)
3.9 (157)
VS.
価格プラン
価格オプション
機能
連携サービス
使いやすさ
価格の妥当性
カスタマーサービス
¥66,249
無料バージョン
無料トライアル
349
13
3.8 (1,547)
3.8 (1,547)
3.7 (1,547)
緑色の評価バーは、平均評価とレビュー数に基づいて高評価の製品を表しています。

JD Edwards EnterpriseOneの他のおすすめ代替製品

NetSuite
高評価の機能
プロジェクトの時間追跡
会計チャート
小切手作成
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
高評価の機能
注文管理
請求、インボイス
財務報告
SAP Concur
高評価の機能
経費精算
経費請求
請求書処理
QuickBooks Enterprise
高評価の機能
収入、バランスシート
財務報告
銀行勘定調整
Oracle Taleo Cloud
高評価の機能
候補者プロフィール
候補者追跡
採用管理
Dynamics 365
高評価の機能
収入、バランスシート
発注管理
財務報告
Sage 100
高評価の機能
総勘定元帳
請求、インボイス
財務報告
Odoo
高評価の機能
作業発注作成
受注
承認プロセス管理
Acumatica Cloud ERP
高評価の機能
売掛金
注文管理
総勘定元帳

JD Edwards EnterpriseOneの評判・レビュー

評価ポイント

総合評価
4.2
使いやすさ
3.8
カスタマーサービス
3.9
機能
4.1
価格の妥当性
3.9

企業規模(従業員数)別レビュー数

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1,000
  • >1,001
Fabio
Fabio
ブラジルのProcurement Supervisor
認証済みLinkedInユーザー
化学, 1,001~5,000人規模の会社
使用期間: 2年以上
投稿経路

検討した類似製品:

Best ERP

5.0 3 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: Unfortunately, I did not work with JD Edwards anymore, but it was a excellent ERP.

良いポイント:

In my opinion it is the best ERP in the market. I have worked with this ERP for more than twelve years, as a key user. It is flexible and easy to customize and has a good support. For Manufactirung module, I think it is the best.

改善してほしい点:

As it is easy to customize, when you need to update or upgrade the ERP, you have to spend more time testing.

Bryon
アメリカのTax & Treasury Accountant
石油、エネルギー, 201~500人規模の会社
使用期間: 2年以上
投稿経路

JDEdwards

5.0 4 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: JDE has made most of our processes significantly easier and more accurate.

良いポイント:

Integration was exactly as expected. JDE has been integral to our success in managing the financials, inventory management, supply chain management. It's also easy to integrate other pieces of specialized software.

改善してほしい点:

JDE requires a good amount of IT help to make any updates or adjustments this leads to upgrades happening slower than we'd like.

Howard
Maintenance Planner / Storeroom Supervisor
食品、飲料, 10,000+人規模の会社
使用期間: 2年以上
投稿経路
ソース:SoftwareAdvice

9 years of experience with JD Edwards software: Opinion, The single, worst piece of CMMS software I have Ever used.

1.0 7 年前

良いポイント:

The only positive remark I can make about JDE CMMS is that it will be going away at this location, Soon

改善してほしい点:

NOT user-friendly: at other locations I have trained Production AND Maintenance personnel in the use of CMMS / work order entry very effectively. From the most savvy computer users to old guy who didn't even know what a mouse was for. JDE: like pulling teeth to get them to use the system at all because it is so difficult to learn and counter-intuitive to most users. Not efficient: First red flag I found in JDE was that it took more than 20 clicks / selections (at best - assuming ALL default selections could be accepted) to simply PRINT 1 Work Order. While working thru that process, it was necessary to indicate, at least twice, (this is a computer folks, why would you be required to repeat the object to be printed. (First step- select the W/O, then about step 8 or 10 it had to be selected again.) This was eventually corrected to allow a SINGLE W/O to be printed in 2 clicks, but multiple selections still require these steps. Not intuitive: there are (or were) places in JDE where selecting a RED X is/was required to SAVE steps accomplished in a process. This may have been changed to a green check or a disk in recent updates, but it still begs the question. ?WHY would ANY software make such a selection necessary? EVER.? Did I mention,... NOT Efficient: using other (very effective) software, the old guy (as well as most anyone else) could enter the critical data for a Work order in under 30 seconds after maybe a couple weeks of use. at this point, (9 years, 3 updates later) even I, the most experienced user on the CMMS System, cannot enter the data necessary to create a W/O in less than 3 minutes. and it does not just work orders that consume valuable time. most of the processes in JDE require so many repetitive actions, that it is sickening to watch some of the individuals perform their daily tasks from purchasing, inventory functions, etc. because so much time is wasted in the process. and to top it all off, from early on (to present day) when I was observing some of the folks who work with me perform those daily tasks, I noticed them exiting the process, then returning to the process, as though they were double checking the entries. when I inquired about this action / repeated steps, I was told that on occasion it was possible for you to "time-out" on your JDE access, and have absolutely Zero indication that had occurred. so all of these folks had gotten in the habit of exiting then re-entering to verify the information did indeed get saved to the system. I actually had a hard time believing this could happen, with no indication, until it happened to my co-worker who was working with me at the desk next to mine and I personally witnessed it. (less than 6 months ago)

認証済みレビュアー
認証済みLinkedInユーザー
アウトソーシング、オフショア, 10,000+人規模の会社
使用期間: 2年以上
投稿経路

JDE will make your AP process smoother than ever

4.0 3 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: My overall experience with JD Edwards can be described as a learning ride. JDE is not too user friendly or intuitive, but once you learn how to use it and all the codes necessary for the actions required for your AP Process, then you can start to take full advantage of all its possibilities. In my team we have been very benefited by the use of this tool and are currently using it on a daily basis. I would totally recommend it.

良いポイント:

All the information needed about a vendor is already in the system when a new vendor creation is done, so you do not have to worry about remembering what are the payment terms, or checking what is their bank account. You just have to check that the invoice in the system was correctly processed and then once the payment is ran, you will get all the information on when the invoice will be paid, or you can even change the Net Due Date so it can be paid earlier if it is a down payment. Correction of payments is also very easy to do in JDE. You just have to create a PD (or cancellation document) for said payment and then create a new one with all the vendor information and change the items that were incorrectly booked, such as invoice amount, tax code, BU, among others. Then you just proceed to do the clearings so the action can be recorded in the books and done!

改善してほしい点:

One of the most important aspects for me is the ability to handle your vendor master data. Unfortunately for JDE this is not one of its brightest points. If the same vendor has changed their VAT and are now using a new one, or they changed their banking information, you cannot change it in the system, but you have to either create a new vendor with the new information, or duplicate the one existing and update the new items. This, sadly, takes quite some time (at least 48 hours), therefore impacting your payment process and generating delays.

Mark
Mark
アメリカのGlobal RPA & Automations Manager
認証済みLinkedInユーザー
消費財, 5,001~10,000人規模の会社
使用期間: 2年以上
投稿経路

EnterpriseOne - It's Enough

4.0 2 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: Overall, EnterpriseOne does what it sets out to be, a capable and reliable, ERP system. Beyond that, it does not probably hold a candle to more expensive and robust ERP systems.

良いポイント:

It's rather simple to pick up and learn, comes with a lower cost entry to pricing point, handles our massive manufacturing opps well enough. It's clips along at a solid pace, so less time waiting results to query.

改善してほしい点:

E1 is difficult to automate. Our robotics team requires endless loops, checks, and tests to ensure the automation software is working appropriately with E1. Additionally, E1 didn't have the capability to handle retail operations when we entered that market recently. Finally, the base "vanilla" E1 package lacks some features that might be considered standard elsewhere; such as good reporting functions.