--- description: GitHubを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitHubとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [アプリ開発ツール](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [GitHub](/software/129067/github) # GitHub Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/129067/github ページ：1 / 249\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/129067/github?page=2) > 開発チームが共同作業を行い、コードをレビューおよび管理できるソフトウェア。Windows、Mac、およびモバイル・デバイスで動作できます。 > > 評価：6187人のユーザーによる評価は**4.8/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### GitHubの対象ユーザー 小規模なスタートアップ企業と大企業の両方向けのソフトウェア開発。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.8/5** | 6187 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.7/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Microsoft - **ロケーション**: Redmond, アメリカ - **設立**: 1975 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $4.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ）, Windows（オンプレミス）, Linux（オンプレミス）, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アメリカ合衆国, イギリス, イタリア, イラク, インド, インドネシア, ウクライナ, エジプト, エストニア, オランダ, オーストラリア, オーストリア, カナダ, クロアチア, サウジアラビア, シンガポール, スイス, スペイン, タイ さらに27件 ## 機能 - Automated Testing - Real-Time Analytics - アプリケーション・セキュリティ - グラフィカル・ユーザーインタフェース - コラボレーションツール - コラボレーション開発 - コード点検 - タスク管理 - タスク進捗追跡 - ダッシュボード - チケット管理 - デバッグ - バグ検出、問題検出 - バグ追跡 - バックログ管理 - バージョン管理 - ファイル共有 - プロジェクト管理 - マイルストーン追跡 - モニタリング - リリース管理 - レポジトリ管理 - 品質保証 - 問題追跡 - 報告、プロジェクト追跡 - 統合型開発環境 - 継続的インテグレーション - 継続的デプロイ - 継続的デリバリ - 脆弱性診断 - 設定の管理 - 課題管理 ## 統合 (合計14件) - CircleCI - Git - Heroku - JIRA Service Management - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Pivotal Tracker - Slack - Trello - Vercel - Visual Studio Code ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース ## Category - [アプリ開発ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [アプリ開発ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [ソースコード管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) - [非営利プロジェクト管理ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) - [プロジェクト管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [CIツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) ## 代替製品 1. [GitLab](https://www.capterra.jp/software/159806/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1223 reviews) 2. [Bitbucket](https://www.capterra.jp/software/157785/bitbucket) — 4.6/5 (1346 reviews) 3. [Jira](https://www.capterra.jp/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15417 reviews) 4. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.jp/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (3023 reviews) 5. [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.jp/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4604 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Easy to use" — 4.0/5 > **Federico** | *2024年10月3日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: GitHub, very easy to install, configure, and use, no matter team size. And also, they keep improving it\! Version control is super convenient, and collaboration options, like "pull requests" and code reviews, are really great. Moreover, there are many integrations possible with other tools > > **改善点**: Nothing really bad, except some bugs occasionally, but they are quickly fixed > > GitHub, truly the best collaboration tool for developers\! ----- ### "Reliable Platform for Version Control and Test Automation Collaboration" — 5.0/5 > **Sarav** | *2026年5月20日* | コンピュータ・ソフトウェア | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: GitHub made collaboration and version control very efficient for development and automation testing projects. I especially liked the seamless integration with VS Code, which made committing, reviewing, and managing code much easier directly from the editor. Using GitHub together with Playwright helped streamline test automation workflows, maintain test scripts, and collaborate effectively with team members through PRs and branch management. > > **改善点**: Managing merge conflicts and repository permissions sometimes required extra attention. Some advanced enterprise features and CI/CD capabilities may also become expensive for smaller teams. > > Overall, my experience with GitHub has been very positive. It has been a reliable platform for source code management, collaboration, and automation testing workflows. The integration with VS Code improved developer productivity, and using Playwright with GitHub helped organize and maintain automated test scripts efficiently. Features like pull requests, issue tracking, and GitHub Actions added value to the development lifecycle and team collaboration. ----- ### "The Version Control Packed With Features" — 4.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2026年5月27日* | 消費財 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: This version control makes coding, deployment and maintainance of repository easier for a team.The tool is also exceptional for automating workflows. Easy to integrate with other UI platforms such as source tree , making it user friendly. > > **改善点**: Permission and security management with access tokens can be complicated. For large enterprices, Github can be expensive. For a new user, advance features have a steap learning curve. > > overall, I have a positive experience with the platform. Github is a widely used version control platform helping team collaboration and clean coding. over the years, it has created a strong ecosystem of its own. The large online community makes the life of a user easier. ----- ### "Good tool for code management but lacks some features when integrating with Confluence/Jira" — 3.0/5 > **Mark** | *2025年6月3日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：6.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: GitHub is a great tool to manage pull requests and being able to add labels in our teams helps to differentiate between urgent items which need reviews and are vital for the next release. > > **改善点**: One of the drawbacks with GitHub is integrating non development team members into a workflow process. Even though it is possible to setup a workflow too add approvers the terminology and UI is very developer based so can be a bit confusing to non development colleagues. > > Overall GItHub is a good tool for managing code, getting reviews and merging into the relevant branch ahead of deployment. There are some good integrations but it would be great if it could work more seamlessly with Confluence and Jira, and provide additional features to help automatically manage the correct states of the linked jira. ----- ### "The undisputed standard for code collaboration and open source" — 4.0/5 > **Davide** | *2026年4月17日* | セキュリティ、調査 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: GitHub Actions is the CI/CD tool I prefer over any other. It is immediate, works extremely well, supports multiple operating systems, and even allows you to run self-hosted runners on-premises with minimal setup. What makes it truly powerful is the ecosystem: thousands of community-built, reusable actions exist for almost every use case, so you rarely have to reinvent the wheel. This saves an enormous amount of time day to day. Beyond Actions, the pull request workflow is excellent and the collaboration features — Issues and Discussions in particular — are extremely convenient and well-designed. GitHub is also the de facto standard for open source: almost every meaningful open source project lives here, and the fact that public repositories are free makes it the natural home for community-driven software. I use it both for my personal open source projects and at an enterprise level, and it handles both scenarios very well. The ability to host public and private repositories on the same platform without needing separate tools is a significant advantage. > > **改善点**: The project management section (GitHub Projects) still feels rough compared to dedicated tools like Linear. It works, but the UX is unintuitive and I usually reach for other tools when I need real project tracking. Issues and Discussions are great; Projects needs more work. Stability has also become a concern. GitHub has been experiencing more frequent outages lately. They are usually short, but they are disruptive — when your entire workflow depends on GitHub (pushing code, running pipelines, reviewing PRs), even brief downtime brings everything to a halt. Finally, the notification system is genuinely broken for my use case. The sheer volume of notifications makes it nearly impossible to find the ones that actually matter — a comment on your own issue, a review request, a mention. I often miss important updates unless someone tells me directly or I stumble across them manually. > > GitHub is a tool I would recommend to any team, regardless of size or industry. Small teams can get started for free; larger organizations can scale up to GitHub Enterprise. The platform works equally well for closed-source commercial projects and public open source repositories, and you never need to split your work across multiple tools. I would especially recommend it to anyone building or contributing to open source software — GitHub is the central hub where projects are born, grow, and gain traction. There is simply no better place to build in public. It is also worth noting that GitHub is not limited to software developers. Writers, researchers, and academics can benefit from version-controlled plain-text workflows (Markdown, LaTeX) managed through branches and releases — and modern AI tooling makes the learning curve much more approachable than it used to be. In short: I could not work without GitHub. Despite its rough edges, it remains the most complete and widely adopted platform for code collaboration and version control available today. ----- ページ：1 / 249\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/129067/github?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/129067/github) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | tr | | ----- ## 構造化データ