--- description: RedTeam Goを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: RedTeam Goとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [施工管理システム](/directory/30057/construction-management/software) > [RedTeam Go](/software/126972/paskr-project-management-suite) # RedTeam Go Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/126972/paskr-project-management-suite ページ：1 / 6\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/126972/paskr-project-management-suite?page=2) > 入札から終了までのワークフローを標準化する建設管理ソフトウェア。 > > 評価：108人のユーザーによる評価は**4.3/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### RedTeam Goの対象ユーザー ゼネコン、下請業者、オーナー、および非常に大規模なプロジェクトに必要とされる財務チームのメンバー。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.3/5** | 108 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.1/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 80% | (8/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: RedTeam Software - **ロケーション**: Orlando, アメリカ - **設立**: 2006 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $10,000.00 - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アメリカ合衆国 ## 機能 - Budget Tracking - RFP管理 - カレンダー管理 - コラボレーションツール - スケジューリング - タイムシート管理 - タスク管理 - テンプレートのカスタマイズ - ドキュメント管理 - プロジェクト管理 - モバイル・アクセス - レポート／分析 - 下請け業者管理 - 入札管理 - 原価追跡 - 営業パイプライン管理 - 変更注文管理 - 契約・ライセンス管理 - 履歴データベース - 見積もり、概算 - 販売承認 - 顧客追跡 ## 統合 (合計2件) - QuickBooks Online - Sage Construction Suite ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [施工管理システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30057/construction-management/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [施工管理システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30057/construction-management/software) - [建築見積ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30056/construction-estimating/software) - [建設入札管理ソフトウェア](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30960/construction-bid-management/software) - [建築業向け CRMソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30657/construction-crm/software) - [建設スケジュールソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31522/construction-scheduling/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Procore](https://www.capterra.jp/software/56250/procore) — 4.5/5 (2657 reviews) 2. [Buildertrend](https://www.capterra.jp/software/70092/buildertrend) — 4.5/5 (2485 reviews) 3. [Houzz Pro](https://www.capterra.jp/software/199689/houzz-pro) — 4.3/5 (1086 reviews) 4. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.jp/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6015 reviews) 5. [Visual Planning](https://www.capterra.jp/software/91852/visual-planning) — 4.5/5 (94 reviews) ## レビュー ### "RedTeam Go makes my work life easier." — 5.0/5 > **Kelly** | *2023年6月1日* | 建設 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The accounting features are what use and love most. All the information is at my finger tips and my PM's can track the status of their owner and sub payments without having to ask me. > > **改善点**: Some of the filter options could be improved in the accounting section. > > I would not want to be without RedTeam Go. Its our main hub for project management. ----- ### "Red Team Review" — 5.0/5 > **Mark** | *2023年6月1日* | 建設 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Easy to use, I like the bidding and awarding of subcontracts > > **改善点**: I preferred the live help line vs the online chat ----- ### "Paskr saves time" — 3.0/5 > **Leanne** | *2016年10月11日* | 建設 | おすすめ評価：6.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Bidding, billing, chat support, training library > > **改善点**: reporting, contact database, sales tax > > Our PM team has seen increase in productivity due to using Paskr. The bidding module saves time \& is excellent for managing invitations \& compiling sub bids. Paskr is fundamentally a solid tool for tracking the project's bottom line, housing documentation, \& overseeing progress. There are endless possibilities for growth/improvement within the software with respect to document control, reporting, \& accounting connectivity. Innovations can't come fast enough, as we are excited for the potential we see in Paskr. The staff at Paskr has bent over backwards to please us \& train our staff on Paskr processes. They are attentive \& responsive to both us \& our contacts. L1 needs more training to avoid providing misdirection. The support staff is amazing, but limited by the program itself \& its functionality. More often than not our requests are left with "future enhancement" as a response. As with any software there is a learning curve. We are slowly learning the Paskr process \& developing work-arounds for its limitations. The platform is rudimentary \& user-friendly but not necessarily intuitive. Therefore, it takes time to learn its idiosyncrasies (thank goodness for the chat feature). Features \& functionality are lacking from my perspective (accounting) as I rely heavily on reports. All reports are in pdf format \& not customizable or interactive. Developing reports that allow you to click on figures \& see what is behind them would be a huge leap in functionality for both the PM \& accounting depts. Printing pdf reports \& manually searching for data to audit is very time consuming for accounting \& leaves the PM blindly accepting his/her entries. The QB web connector is what drew us to the product over others, however it is very basic \& requires manual massage of data to correct some glitches in the data transfer. Again a time consuming process (yet still quicker than our prior fully manual system). Example of an area needing enhancement that would have tremendous impact: dashboard calendar. It could be a highly effective tool for PM team if it integrated task from all project for which they were assigned, allowing them to have full view from a single pane of glass. Overall we are better with Paskr than we were before it. There is potential for Paskr to be so much more. As it improves our productivity will also improve, as will our staff's ability to convey the pulse of the business to our owner which was our primary reason for selecting Paskr software. ----- ### "Red Team" — 5.0/5 > **Toni** | *2023年6月1日* | 建設 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Bidding, document management, live chat. > > **改善点**: Trying to get used to all the steps it takes to do change orders ----- ### "RedTeam Go" — 5.0/5 > **Isaac** | *2023年6月1日* | 建設 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Integration was easy. Writing contracts and CO's, creating owner billing, and managing bid requests are what I love about RTG, fast and easy\! > > **改善点**: Spell check feature does not work or lags many times. > > We have increased productivity with RTG and all the project managers love the quickness of writing contracts ----- ページ：1 / 6\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/126972/paskr-project-management-suite?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/126972/paskr-project-management-suite) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## 構造化データ