--- description: Assemblaを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Assemblaとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [ソースコード管理ツール](/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) > [Assembla](/software/112631/assembla) # Assembla Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/112631/assembla ページ：1 / 5\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/112631/assembla?page=2) > Subversion、Perforce、Gitリポジトリ用のクラウド・ホスティングを提供するセキュアなバージョン管理およびプロジェクト・コラボレーション・プラットフォーム。 > > 評価：103人のユーザーによる評価は**4.2/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Assemblaの対象ユーザー ソフトウェアを構築するチーム。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.2/5** | 103 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.0/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 3.8/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 3.8/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.0/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 70% | (7/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: IDERA - **設立**: 2011 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $56.50 - **価格モデル**: (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ）, Linux（デスクトップ） - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アイルランド, アゼルバイジャン, アフガニスタン, アメリカ合衆国, アラブ首長国連邦, アルジェリア, アルゼンチン, アルバ, アルバニア, アルメニア, アンギラ, アンゴラ, アンティグア・バーブーダ, アンドラ, イエメン, イギリス, イスラエル, イタリア, イラク さらに208件 ## 機能 - カスタム開発 - コラボレーションツール - コラボレーション開発 - コードレポジトリ統合 - コード点検 - タスク管理 - タスク進捗追跡 - ドキュメント管理 - バグ検出、問題検出 - バグ追跡 - バックアップ、修復 - バージョン管理 - ファイル共有 - プロジェクト管理 - プロジェクト計画／スケジューリング - ポートフォリオ管理 - マイルストーン追跡 - リソース管理 - ワークフロー管理 - 問題追跡 - 報告、プロジェクト追跡 - 変更管理 - 時間・支出追跡 - 監査証跡 - 継続的インテグレーション - 複数プログラミング言語をサポート - 課題管理 - 請求、インボイス ## 統合 (合計14件) - Dropbox - Filestack - GitHub - Gmail - Google Docs - Google Drive - Jira - Meta for Business - OneDrive - Slack - TestRail - Travis CI - Trello - Zapier ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [ソースコード管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [ソースコード管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) - [プロジェクト管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [バグ追跡システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) ## 代替製品 1. [monday AI Work Platform](https://www.capterra.jp/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6123 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.jp/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15498 reviews) 3. [Caspio](https://www.capterra.jp/software/137206/caspio) — 4.6/5 (249 reviews) 4. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.jp/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6206 reviews) 5. [Juno.one](https://www.capterra.jp/software/204436/junoone) — 4.4/5 (26 reviews) ## レビュー ### "A one Hub solution that could work a bit faster" — 4.0/5 > **Corstiaan** | *2021年2月4日* | インターネット | おすすめ評価：7.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: It's a one-hub solution. Everything I need is within reach. Task management and planning in the card-wall of tickets are indispensable. > > **改善点**: Slow: Opening a page or a ticket can sometimes take seconds of looking at a blank page. When used in meeting this is really annoying. Clutter: It lacks options to clean-up. Since I work with it for 10 years I have 150 projects in my view and no way to hide old projects. New projects appear at the bottom of that list, so scrolling galore\! Yes, I could go to the project-owner and ask him to archive, but you know how that goes in large companies and I don't have rights to archive so I'm stuck with over 10 years of old projects. GIT: It could use some more optimizations, specially Merge-request handling / canceling, retaining comments etc. > > It's a solution that has it all but I would welcome an overhaul of UI and backend optimization for speed. It feels like there's a lot of ancient code in there. ----- ### "Strive to be best toolset for development organization" — 4.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2020年2月11日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：6.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: It is a cloud based solution and can be accessed from anywhere. Support for protocols like git. It has embedded document management workflow. > > **改善点**: Lack of support for document search. Lack of support for wide adoption among developers. No easy way of project management, bug tracking etc. At the least the versions that we used in the past. No management reports. It serves the basic purpose of source code management with git. No clear support for command line tools and scripting for ci/cd pipelines. > > It is ok for smaller teams. It is affordable. Not much of online documentation, but most parts are intuitive. ----- ### "Slow and inconvenient" — 1.0/5 > **ximena** | *2021年2月3日* | アニメーション | おすすめ評価：3.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The Kaban and list view are convenient. Being able to add options to tickets are also good for management, and the prioritization set is good too. The way the tickets keep track of the dates and hours of every change in the ticket is really good. And the relationships you can build between tickets is good too. > > **改善点**: A don't like many things about this software, the main thing is that Is too hard to plan long-term using it. Also is hard to have access to quantitative reports. To keep all my information accurate and easy to access I use Airtable to organize the information I have on Assembla. Because Assembla is too slow and too hard to get reports from it. Everyone at my office does the same thing of using another tool to interpret and organize the info we have on Assembla. I think a Gantt view would help and a view more likely to excel in which you could add and edit tickets faster. It would be great if you could build features for the admins to build their own statistics and reports. And features to automate some actions on tickets. > > It has been not as good, the tool is slow and more like an old management tool. Also, the customer service is not very good. We had to report all manager for a whole week the same problem to get a follow up for the problem. For a whole week, all of our teams couldn't see the missing info on tickets, it was a waste of our time and resources. ----- ### "Assembla for SVN only" — 5.0/5 > **scott** | *2021年5月6日* | コンピュータ・ソフトウェア | おすすめ評価：4.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Reliable SVN Server, pretty fast, easy to manage > > **改善点**: We just use the SVN features, it's ridiculously expensive per person for SVN,. > > Other than the ridiculous cost its been extremely reliable for the past 7 years we have used it. We've had a couple short outages but they were very brief and got quick attention from their support. ----- ### "honest opinion" — 4.0/5 > **Steffano** | *2021年2月13日* | エンタテインメント | おすすめ評価：5.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: It seems very secure, and I love the fact that you can see which files others have checked out, that's huge thing when working with a big team. > > **改善点**: It's super slow when you need to revert files or when you added 2k files to a submit queue and you decide not to move forward with the submit. That will take a lot of time and it's really annoying. One last thing is that is a pain in the ass for new users especially for artists to setup perforce, perforce should have automated tools to setup your workspace, like a wizard to ask you about the basics. Having to open the command to type manual commands is not intuitive. > > Even with its flaws it's a good option over git and svn, it has a nice webapp to help you keep track of the project and source files. ----- ページ：1 / 5\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/112631/assembla?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/112631/assembla) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## 構造化データ