--- description: FlexSimを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: FlexSimとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [シミュレーションソフト](/directory/30607/simulation/software) > [FlexSim](/software/107009/flexsim) # FlexSim Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/107009/flexsim ページ：1 / 6\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/107009/flexsim?page=2) > FlexSimは、あらゆるプロセスのモデル化、分析、可視化、最適化を支援し、既存のデータを正確な予測に変えます。 > > 評価：128人のユーザーによる評価は**4.6/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### FlexSimの対象ユーザー FlexSimは、製造、倉庫、サプライチェーン、物流、ヘルスケアなどのエンジニアや意思決定者が、シミュレーションのモデリングと分析をより簡単に、より強力に行えるように設計されています。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.6/5** | 128 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.0/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.5/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Autodesk - **ロケーション**: San Rafael, アメリカ - **設立**: 1982 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) (無料のトライアル) - **価格プランの詳細**: 価格については、お近くのFlexSim社販売代理店にお問い合わせください。 - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Windows（デスクトップ）, Windows（オンプレミス） - **サポートされる言語**: 中国語, 日本語, 繁体中国語, 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイルランド, アメリカ合衆国, アルジェリア, アルゼンチン, イギリス, イタリア, インド, ウクライナ, エクアドル, エジプト, オランダ, オーストラリア, オーストリア, カナダ, ギリシャ, コロンビア, シンガポール, スイス, スウェーデン, スペイン さらに30件 ## 機能 - 3D画像処理 - エージェント・ベース・モデル - グラフィカルデータ・プレゼンテーション - プレゼンテーション・ツール - モーション・モデリング - レポート／分析 - 動的モデリング - 数学的モデリング - 直接操作 - 確率モデル - 連続モデリング - 離散事象モデリング ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート - チャット対応有 ## Category - [シミュレーションソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30607/simulation/software) ## 代替製品 1. [SimForm](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1078103/SimForm) — 4.3/5 (3 reviews) 2. [AnyLogic](https://www.capterra.jp/software/95940/anylogic) — 4.5/5 (518 reviews) 3. [MATLAB](https://www.capterra.jp/software/125813/matlab) — 4.6/5 (2090 reviews) 4. [Ansys Discovery](https://www.capterra.jp/software/210124/ansys-discovery) — 3.9/5 (17 reviews) 5. [COMSOL Multiphysics](https://www.capterra.jp/software/123801/comsol-multiphysics) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Great looking and advanced simulations" — 5.0/5 > **Igor** | *2019年6月20日* | 教育管理 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Great visualization makes it very pleasant to start learning; Lots of built-in features, Data import-export; Different modes (3D, ProcessFlow), where you can work simultaneously or independently; Strong statistics (distributions), that can be integrated on the models, collecting and presenting data; Anything you lack regarding the model or actor logic can be added as code snippets; Really basic models can be made in minutes > > **改善点**: It becomes difficult to learn it when you go in deep. The really basic actions are easy and intuitive, like for kids. But when you get to something just little more complex - it requires a lot of additional knowledge. Little community tutorials. There are not many community samples and tutorials on youtube or in the web. Most of them are over basic functions - you probably will need to enroll a training. > > I am a teacher in university. I had never worked with simulation software before, so it was my first software of such type. FlexSim is just a whole universe, with it's own logic and rules. If you want to do BIG things with it - you have to understand all of these rules, accept them and change your own thinking to follow that rules (to think like FlexSim would think). I am a very advanced user of Excel, and Excel is a large universe as well. But now I am wondering which of them is bigger. ----- ### "FlexSim is a Great Tool" — 4.0/5 > **Kavan** | *2019年6月14日* | 食品製造 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: What I like most about FlexSim is the software's ease of use. I did trials on several other simulation software and FlexSim came out on top for me. It was intuitive and just simply made sense when building models. After the initial training I built a simulation model to represent one of our biggest production plants. Having that 3D visual was key in explaining processes to the rest of the team, and I could make real time changes in the model to work through those "what if" scenarios. The intricate details and the ability to allow viewers to see a different perspectives is actually very eye opening. > > **改善点**: What I like least about the software is the lack of floor levels that are representative of actual buildings. This might be minor, but I wished there were options for prebuilt stairs and different floor levels. Stairs and floor levels are common in plants, hospitals, airport, etc., so why not give the user those items in the toolbox. For example, if I wanted to simulate a building with three floors, with people walking from one floor to the other (not necessarily one above the other, otherwise we wouldn't be able to see the operation on the other floors), using a second and third elevated floor plan. Hopefully that makes sense. > > At the moment I use FlexSim to simulation the possibilities within a given confined space. I build models to represent a few different scenarios and demonstrate them to the team, so that leadership can make a decision on particular go/no-go criteria for a project. I use FlexSim to demonstrate possibilities that people in the viewing group might not have even considered, and generate new conversations regarding what's possible and which direction to go. ----- ### "Very pretty, but too hard to use if not in it often" — 3.0/5 > **Kate** | *2025年12月15日* | 病院、ヘルスケア | おすすめ評価：3.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: It was a very pretty way to show simulations that have real potential to be useful to show off to champions and project sponsors. > > **改善点**: I tried very hard and have a lot of background in simulation and couldn't get to a point where it made sense for our company to use it, I wasn't confident in the mathematical rigor of the simulations, and couldn't train my coworkers to use it, > > I really wanted to try like it but ended up not choosing it for the simulation software my company uses. ----- ### "Long time Simulation practitioner" — 5.0/5 > **Dhuey** | *2019年6月20日* | 食品、飲料 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Very easy to build a simple model with the 3D Objects. The 3D objects have enough hooks in place to deal with more complex situations as well. There is no need to know programing language. The software is a tool that can be used by both the novice and experienced modeler. > > **改善点**: The users manual is a bit hard to follow, and missing some information. I would like more options for flow item shapes and shapes for resources. > > We are using FlexSim to evaluate a new production line, everything from equipment capability, line control logic and staffing. The data from the simulations has enabled us to reduce staffing, and equipment requirements. ----- ### "All purpose simulation software" — 5.0/5 > **Vincent** | *2019年6月13日* | 経営コンサルティング | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Stunning interactive 3D graphics, full programming capabilities (no external compiler needed), links with Excel and SQL databases, ability to customize anything and develop reusable libraries > > **改善点**: Limited cloud interactivity, too many new important features appearing, company focus seems to be on Process Flow module which is more complicated to use by programmers and less object-oriented > > I simulate mining sites (surface and underground), mine-to-port logistics, food and beverage plants, airport baggage handling systems, mechanical workshops, manufacturing assembly lines, distribution centers, distribution networks, supply chains, rail and road transport systems. Very visual although visual can be turned off or ignored, very efficient flexscript language, I can simulate a wide range of industries with a single tool. ----- ページ：1 / 6\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/107009/flexsim?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/107009/flexsim) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## 構造化データ