--- description: Baserowを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Baserowとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [データベースソフト](/directory/18/database-management/software) > [Baserow](/software/1045353/baserow) # Baserow Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/1045353/baserow ページ：1 / 4\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1045353/baserow?page=2) > Baserowはオープンソースのコード不要のデータベースツールで、企業のデータ管理とコラボレーションを容易にします。 > > 評価：69人のユーザーによる評価は**4.7/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.7/5** | 69 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.5/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.7/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Baserow ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $0.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Windows（オンプレミス）, Linux（オンプレミス） - **サポートされる言語**: イタリア語, インドネシア語, ウクライナ語, オランダ語, スペイン語, チェコ語, ドイツ語, ノルウェー語, フィンランド語, フランス語, ポルトガル語, ポルトガル語, ポーランド語, ロシア語, 中国語, 日本語, 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アイルランド, アゼルバイジャン, アフガニスタン, アメリカ合衆国, アラブ首長国連邦, アルジェリア, アルゼンチン, アルバ, アルバニア, アルメニア, アンギラ, アンゴラ, アンティグア・バーブーダ, アンドラ, イエメン, イギリス, イスラエル, イタリア, イラク さらに208件 ## 機能 - Goal Setting/Tracking - Sales Planning - Web／モバイル・アプリ開発 - アイデア管理 - インテグレーション管理 - オンボーディング - ガントチャート、タイムラインビュー - コラボレーションツール - タスク管理 - タスク進捗追跡 - テンプレート - デプロイ管理 - データのインポート／エクスポート - データ同期 - データ複製 - ドキュメント管理 - ドラッグ・アンド・ドロップ - ノーコード - バックアップ、修復 - ビジネスプロセスの自動化 - ビジュアル・モデリング - ビルド済みテンプレート - ビルド済みモジュール - ファイル共有 - プロジェクト計画／スケジューリング - ポートフォリオ管理 - マイルストーン追跡 - リソース管理 - ワークフロー管理 - 予算運用 - 優先順位付け - 土地管理 - 報告、プロジェクト追跡 - 従業員管理 - 時間と参加 - 時間・支出追跡 - 検索／フィルター - 申請者追跡 - 製品ロードマッピング - 課題管理 ## 統合 (合計3件) - Pipedream - Zapier - n8n.io ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - チャット対応有 ## Category - [データベースソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/18/database-management/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [データベースソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/18/database-management/software) - [ローコード開発ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31756/low-code-development-platform/software) - [アプリ構築ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/32016/app-building/software) - [ノー コードツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/32095/no-code-platform/software) - [人事管理システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/5/human-resource/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Pipedrive](https://www.capterra.jp/software/132666/pipedrive) — 4.5/5 (3049 reviews) 2. [kintone](https://www.capterra.jp/software/143607/kintone) — 4.7/5 (153 reviews) 3. [Caspio](https://www.capterra.jp/software/137206/caspio) — 4.6/5 (249 reviews) 4. [Claris FileMaker](https://www.capterra.jp/software/162784/filemaker) — 4.3/5 (207 reviews) 5. [Airtable](https://www.capterra.jp/software/146652/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2227 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Baserow functional modern database approach" — 5.0/5 > **Domingo** | *2023年5月11日* | 研究 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I probably like the functionality and having the ability to self host the product is very important to be able to fully customize and align it with the institution's requirement > > **改善点**: The only thing we are missing is the live data view. For example is the live connection between airtable/google sheet existing table where we can see the changes to the original table in real time ----- ### "Baserow: The Low Code Base we all wanted" — 5.0/5 > **Jacob** | *2023年5月16日* | マーケティング、広告 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I like that it is using a FOSS model, and features self-hosting. The UI is much more laid back compared to competitors like SmartSuite and Airtable. Which can be a bit much with the UI colors. Baserow has the cleanness of a tool like Notion which I prefer.Also, the templates are really good. Would love to be able to help expand them.Love how the forms work as well as public sharing, it's just better than Airtable's setup here. Something nice about the cloud-based version. > > **改善点**: The user access is really bad. There should be a way to share a single base without everything in the workspace without having to go to the highest plan. Even then going through teams only for that kind of access is archaic and harder for users to manage. I have files I'd like only certain people to access, and sometimes on an individual basis. I would love it if Baserow had a feature to let guests edit public files without an account. Similar to a form.Wish it had more "extension" features, maybe a click-up or notion direct integration. Zapier helps here, though, I want to use this as a database inside of other tools directly. There are a lot of systems that do project management very well and it would be better to use this inside of those than lock it as a competitor of those systems to "compete". The pricing model is what it is, but I don't like it. A huge reason of why I've switched out of Airtable was cost. It seemed like you kept upgrading and upgrading and still were missing key features behind a payroll. For a team that got expensive. Baserow is much cheaper, but I'd feel more inclined to pay for the premium if I got more for it. Not just one user, not all of these scope limitations, a real value add for an org. This software is competing against google sheets which works just as well for 90+% of people with the same use cases for absolutely no cost. Figuring out how much you're going to pay for a team with most of these base software's is going to require thi > > Very good. I'm rooting for this platform to succeed in the long run. ----- ### "Great effort. needs many improvements." — 3.0/5 > **mazin** | *2023年5月25日* | 医療機器 | おすすめ評価：7.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: clean interface. seems to load much faster than airtable. support is by far exceeds others. > > **改善点**: Baserow, is missing many features offered by airtable. Such as the view imbed feature, where we can imbed a certain view, with automatically generated I frame, with options to convert the "grid" view into card format, (horizontal), that's very pleasing to look at. another, is hidden items. with baserow there is no option to hide items in order to minimize "item headers", but have all item's fully visible in expanded mode. in base row hidden items remain hidden, which makes the entire feature worthless. also, the controls, are as worthless as airtable, and are not compatible with mobile devices, in imbed / I Frame mode. Serious IOs compatibility as well, just like the competition. > > over all support is very good. sadly, without the certain features we cannot sign up. in order for baserow to excel, it must: offer all the airtable features, for less $, or offer better platform for the same (or more) $. ----- ### "Use Baserow instead of Google Form" — 4.0/5 > **Yoann** | *2023年5月19日* | 教育管理 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: easy to deployeasy to useeasy to understand > > **改善点**: we have to replace Google Forms and it cannot do it ----- ### "Affordable and Growing alternative to Airtable and Notion" — 5.0/5 > **Zachary** | *2023年5月12日* | デザイン | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I think the most I liked about Baserow was that it offered a lot of the features I was expecting coming from using Notion. I also worked with Airtable before and I think that Baserow can substitute both those platforms. But it exceeds them because Baserow is open source. That's what I like about this app. You can host it wherever you want and you get a solid user experience. I certainly see myself using this app for my day to day needs and for my clients as well. Also preparing templates with this app is easy and I would definitely pursue that angle as well. > > **改善点**: I feel like a rich text field like HTML or Markdown is missing in Baserow. I saw it in their development roadmap and I can't wait to also see that field in the list of fields Baserow offers. This is important to me because with this field, I won't have to rely on google docs, or uploading markdown files to the attachment field for writing longer form content. > > Overall, I had a solid experience using Baserow and I would recommend it to anyone coming from a background of using Notion or Airtable. I had connection issues with Notion and Airtable where I am from. However, I could easily fix that problem by hosting an instance of Baserow in my own server. ----- ページ：1 / 4\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1045353/baserow?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1045353/baserow) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fi | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## 構造化データ