--- description: Florence eTMFを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Florence eTMFとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [臨床試験管理システム](/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) > [Florence eTMF](/software/1037953/florence-etmf) # Florence eTMF Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/1037953/florence-etmf ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1037953/florence-etmf?page=2) > 臨床試験を管理するための直感的なワークフローを備えた、電子治験関連文書 (eTMF) ソリューションです。 > > 評価：18人のユーザーによる評価は**4.6/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Florence eTMFの対象ユーザー 治験依頼者、CRO、治験施設、医療機器、バイオテクノロジー、病院および医療システム、学術医療センター向け。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.6/5** | 18 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.8/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.5/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 80% | (8/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Florence Healthcare ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アイルランド, アメリカ合衆国, アルゼンチン, アルバニア, アンドラ, イギリス, イスラエル, イタリア, インドネシア, ウクライナ, エジプト, エストニア, オランダ, オーストラリア, オーストリア, オーランド諸島, カナダ, カメルーン, カンボジア さらに50件 ## 機能 - 21 CFR Part 11準拠 - HIPAA準拠 - データのインポート／エクスポート - ドキュメント管理 - ワークフロー管理 ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース ## Category - [臨床試験管理システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Castor EDC](https://www.capterra.jp/software/143532/castor-edc) — 4.7/5 (204 reviews) 2. [Florence eBinders](https://www.capterra.jp/software/200364/florence-ebinders) — 4.5/5 (83 reviews) 3. [Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite](https://www.capterra.jp/software/192454/research-manager) — 4.2/5 (112 reviews) 4. [Flex Databases platform](https://www.capterra.jp/software/124010/flex-databases-platform) — 4.5/5 (13 reviews) 5. [Florence SiteLink](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1037074/sitelink) — 4.8/5 (6 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Fantastic eTMF\!" — 5.0/5 > **Sedalia** | *2023年2月10日* | 病院、ヘルスケア | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Florence has incredibly user-friendly software. > > **改善点**: I would like slightly more control on timeline in the implementation phase. ----- ### "Early user's appreciative review" — 5.0/5 > **Melissa** | *2023年2月13日* | 医療機器 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: It has been easy to use Florence, especially once the binders are set up and the roles are established. It has been great for getting signatures from sites, and easily maintaining our TMF and site eISFs. It is so nice to have all the documents in a softare that is easy to navigate, and is constantly improving/ adding new features to make it user friendly. > > **改善点**: The set up does take time, but there is a learning curve for everything. Especially systems as customizeable as Florence. The delegation of authority log feature has not worked as smoothly as I anticipated, given how many changes to study staff and site PIs that there are. > > Florence has enables us to go from paper TMF, to electronic TMF- which has been fantastic. We have learned a lot about electronic systems. ----- ### "Great Potential" — 4.0/5 > **Taylor** | *2023年2月16日* | 研究 | おすすめ評価：5.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The email documents to the binder feature is a huge positive. Granting user access it also simple, and the ability to create digital template logs is beneficial. Also, the ability to change the title of a document if there is an error is a huge plus. I've worked in other eTMFs and to change a document name you have to make it "obsolete" and go through tons of other processes to correct it. > > **改善点**: There is no search function. You cannot search for a specific document if you do not know which folder it is stored in. The binder structure for my studies is complicated, so I sometimes spend 10 minutes trying to decipher where a colleague or site might have saved a specific document. Also, when moving a document, you need to select all the folders to put it in which can be a bit time consuming. ----- ### "Ease of Use and Compliance" — 4.0/5 > **Sara Tisj** | *2023年2月15日* | 医療機器 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Florence has the ability to implement a regulatory compliant trial management file system easily for both you and all your clinical sites. Implementing changes within your file structure is easy. Uploading documents and adding users are easy to complete with simple toggles of buttons and drag and drops. > > **改善点**: Florence still has some challenges in terms of bulk file uploading for example when a new site is onboarded and was previously on paper or transferred. Also, there is no interface to upload images or Dicoms. This is part of our TMF but we have no ability to add these to Florence. Also a CTMS would be great. > > Overall, Florence onboarding and customer service is amazing. They go above and beyond and are always supportive. Although pricing is more than average and there is some downsides overall the experience is great. ----- ### "Florence review" — 5.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2023年2月21日* | バイオテクノロジー | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The fact that documents are electronic, easily located and retrievableeasy to share with study sites, easy to collect documents and to QC > > **改善点**: the reporting features are only worthwhile if everyone including your ISF sites use tags and labels staff training and implementation at the sponsor has been uneven so it is of little value.the search function could use some real updating. lets make it folder specific\! > > paper TMF is a difficult endeavor - this cuts study start in half, and allows for consistent and ongoing visibility into the files so you can keep on top of things. ----- ページ：1 / 2\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1037953/florence-etmf?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1037953/florence-etmf) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | tr | | ----- ## 構造化データ