--- description: Microsoft To Doを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Microsoft To Doとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [タスク管理ツール](/directory/10030/task-management/software) > [Microsoft To Do](/software/1010347/wunderlist) # Microsoft To Do Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/1010347/wunderlist ページ：1 / 124\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1010347/wunderlist?page=2) > ユーザーがTo-Doリストの共有、リマインダーの設定、メモの追加をすることができる、タスク管理アプリ。 > > 評価：3067人のユーザーによる評価は**4.6/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.6/5** | 3067 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.7/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Microsoft - **ロケーション**: Redmond, アメリカ - **設立**: 1975 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Windows（デスクトップ）, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: イタリア語, スウェーデン語, スペイン語, チェコ語, トルコ語, ドイツ語, ノルウェー語, フランス語, ヘブライ語, ポルトガル語, ポーランド語, ロシア語, 中国語, 日本語, 繁体中国語, 英語, 韓国語 - **利用可能な国**: アイルランド, アメリカ合衆国, アルゼンチン, イギリス, イタリア, インド, インドネシア, オランダ, オーストラリア, カナダ, コロンビア, シンガポール, スロベニア, チリ, デンマーク, トルコ, ドイツ, ニュージーランド, フランス, ベトナム さらに10件 ## 機能 - Sub-Task Management - Task Editing - コメント、メモ - コラボレーションツール - タスク管理 - メモ管理 - 優先順位付け - 納期管理 - 進捗の追跡 ## 統合 (合計18件) - Asana - ClickUp - Evernote Teams - GitHub - Google Calendar - Google Sheets - Mattermost - Microsoft 365 - Microsoft OneNote - Microsoft Outlook - Microsoft Teams - Paymo - Placetel - Slack - TMetric ... さらに3件の統合 ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート - チャット対応有 ## Category - [タスク管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10030/task-management/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [タスク管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [生産性向上ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30968/productivity/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Jira](https://www.capterra.jp/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15371 reviews) 2. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.jp/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6037 reviews) 3. [Trello](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23533 reviews) 4. [Any.do](https://www.capterra.jp/software/173614/any-do) — 4.7/5 (931 reviews) 5. [Asana](https://www.capterra.jp/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13574 reviews) ## レビュー ### "予定の管理や期限の通知が簡単にできて重宝しています" — 4.0/5 > **匿名ユーザー** | *2024年11月26日* | 初等・中等教育 | おすすめ評価：7.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: 私が一番気に入っているのは、タスクを選んでアラームと期限を追加できるところです。Microsoftアカウントでサインインすれば携帯等でも同期できるので、どこにいても必要に応じて操作できます。 > > **改善点**: シンプルで使いやすく、リマインダー機能も便利なので、今後もより使いやすいよう改善されていくことに期待しています。 > > 開始のタブから入れば、各操作が画面中央に分かりやすい文章で示されるので、導入初期から使いやすいです。左に並ぶ項目のタブも使いやすく、タスクを入力、整理しながら予定や進捗状況を簡単に確認できます。そのため、忙しい時期でも優先順位を意識して仕事を進められるようになったように思います。 ----- ### "Simple yet very powerful task organizer" — 5.0/5 > **Gabriel** | *2025年3月19日* | Eラーニング | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I love the "My Day" feature. The simplicity of the user interface. very straightforward direct and simple software, which is great. > > **改善点**: While the simple things work great, it would be awesome to have more features. Also, there is something about the my day feature where it would be great if it was easier to rollover unfinished tasks from my previous day. > > Amazing, simple to use, very usefuel for simple every day productivity. ----- ### "Microsoft review- Coordinator" — 4.0/5 > **Kennedy** | *2025年11月6日* | 教育管理 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The thing I like most about Microsoft is that it allows a space on my computer for all of my Outlook calendar events to be laid out in a neater/easier way to see and understand. > > **改善点**: Sometimes I experienced minor lagging/ glitching, which could get annoying. Although, these glitches never lasted very long and they seemed to fix the problem as soon as it was reported. > > Overall, I love using Microsoft and will continue to use it to help keep me organized at work, especially since it is convenient and automatically pulls things from Outlook. ----- ### "A Beginner Tool for Task Management with Noticeable Limits" — 3.0/5 > **Shaun** | *2025年7月18日* | 執筆、編集 | おすすめ評価：6.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: 1) It has a low learning curve and is very easy to use right out of the gate. The navigation is intuitive. 2) If all you need is a basic task manager that works with the Microsoft ecosystem, it is perfectly suitable for that task. 3) Within the Microsoft ecosystem, it does a solid job provide reminders and notifications, connecting to your calendar, etc. The mobile app is also, in my experience, perfectly usable. 4) For most basic task management needs, To Do's features make it perfectly suitable. When I first used it for a single large project, its features let me differentiate types of work, steps, and due dates. > > **改善点**: 1) If you need it to interact with anything outside of the Microsoft ecosystem, I found that you needed to use a third party service as a router between Microsoft and the other ecosystem. For me, this would have required navigating two different ecosystems and manually moving things from one to the other. 2) It is not feature rich. The features it has work great for small project management or general to do lists, but beyond that, it lacks some of the common features of its competitors. I won't fault it too much for this because it is a free piece of software. 3) It isn't, in my opinion, well-designed for managing large projects or multiple projects. The features it has could technically do this work, but I found that this created more confusion and mental drain than a more feature rich alternative. This might not be an issue for someone who does not manage multiple projects which run regularly and all year. 4) Some integrations between To Do and other Microsoft software either isn't possible or requires a third party solution. This is unfortunate. > > When I first started using MTD, I found it to be an intuitive tool for project management. I liked the ability to organize tasks into categories and to have access to these via my phone. However, once I graduated to larger project management across multiple software ecosystems, the limits of MTD became abundantly clear. If one needs it for small project management, I think it is a better piece of software than its immediate competitor (Google Tasks). ----- ### "Microsoft To Do Keeps Me in Order" — 4.0/5 > **Nicholas** | *2026年3月18日* | 建設 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Microsoft To Do has some great features, and really helps me keep track of my day. As someone who can be all over the place, this product helps me keep my task list organized so I can best prioritize what needs to be done. I can manage each project, one at a time, based on how I scheduled myself to do so in To Do. And even better, I can assign some of these tasks to other users, allowing us to collaborate better. It's part of our overall M365 package, so I would say it's worth the money. > > **改善点**: I ran into a few issues earlier on, regarding collaboration, and when I reached out to customer support, they were helpful, if not a bit slow, in realizing that we had incompatible versions of the software installed. A quick update and we were good to go. > > I use Microsoft To Do on a constant basis to keep track of my projects, tasks, and other general needs around the business. I can share the load, or take on other tasks as needed with zero issues. It's truly helped me be my best self when it comes to project management and time management. ----- ページ：1 / 124\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1010347/wunderlist?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1010347/wunderlist) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## 構造化データ