--- description: Basecampを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Basecampとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [グループウェア](/directory/15/collaboration/software) > [Basecamp](/software/56808/basecamp) # Basecamp Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/56808/basecamp ページ：1 / 578\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/56808/basecamp?page=2) > 何百万人もの人々に信頼されているBasecampは、業務の遂行に必要なあらゆることを1か所にまとめています。 > > 評価：14423人のユーザーによる評価は**4.3/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Basecampの対象ユーザー 起業家、フリーランサー、小企業、大規模組織内のグループ。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.3/5** | 14423 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 80% | (8/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Basecamp - **ロケーション**: Chicago, アメリカ - **設立**: 1999 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $15.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ）, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アイルランド, アゼルバイジャン, アフガニスタン, アメリカ合衆国, アラブ首長国連邦, アルジェリア, アルゼンチン, アルバ, アルバニア, アルメニア, アンギラ, アンゴラ, アンティグア・バーブーダ, アンドラ, イエメン, イギリス, イスラエル, イタリア, イラク さらに207件 ## 機能 - @メンション - Discussions/Forums - Sub-Task Management - Task Editing - Third-Party Integrations - アイデア管理 - アクセス制御・許可 - アクティビティ・ダッシュボード - アクティビティ・ニュースフィード - アラート／通知 - アンケートおよびフィードバック - カレンダー管理 - コミュニケーション管理 - コメント、メモ - コラボレーションツール - タスク管理 - タスク進捗追跡 - チャット、メッセージング - テンプレートのカスタマイズ - ドキュメント管理 - ドラッグ・アンド・ドロップ - ファイル共有 - プロジェクト計画／スケジューリング - プロジェクト追跡 - マイルストーン追跡 - メッセージング - モバイル・アクセス - ライブチャット - リアルタイム・チャット - レポートと統計 - ワークフロー構成 - ワークフロー管理 - 優先順位付け - 割り当て管理 - 報告、プロジェクト追跡 - 役割ベース許可 - 時間追跡 - 検索／フィルター - 納期管理 - 製品ロードマッピング - 進捗の追跡 ## 統合 (合計93件) - AgencyDots - Akita - Apideck - Asana - AssessTEAM - Bridge24 - BrightGauge - Calamari - Centreli - Claritee - ClicData - ClickUp - Clockify - CoSchedule Marketing Suite - Cyfe ... さらに78件の統合 ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [グループウェア](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/15/collaboration/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [グループウェア](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [プロジェクト管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [タスク管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [チーム コミュニケーション ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31033/team-communication/software) - [非営利プロジェクト管理ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) ## 代替製品 1. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.jp/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6060 reviews) 2. [Clockify](https://www.capterra.jp/software/169607/clockify) — 4.8/5 (9248 reviews) 3. [Jira](https://www.capterra.jp/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15404 reviews) 4. [Asana](https://www.capterra.jp/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13591 reviews) 5. [Trello](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23548 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Basecamp great for collaboration and project management" — 4.0/5 > **Damian** | *2026年5月21日* | 非営利団体運営 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Basecamp allows for great collaboration. Both internally and with external vendors. Good for project management and assigning tasks to members of a project group. Easy to have back and forth chat on a task/project and copy in others. > > **改善点**: Repetition of notification emails when an update on a project is made and a task is also allocated to someone. > > Great tool for team collaboration, organizing, delegating tasks, staying on track with project timeline/due dates and overall project management. ----- ### "Basecamp: Clarity and Communication Over Complexity" — 5.0/5 > **Radha** | *2026年4月23日* | 法律サービス | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: What I liked most about Basecamp was its simplicity and clarity. It’s designed to help teams stay organized without feeling overwhelmed. In particular: Clean, user‑friendly interface – Basecamp is easy to navigate, even for new users. Everything is laid out clearly, which reduces confusion and onboarding time. Focused approach to project management – Instead of endless features, Basecamp sticks to core tools like to‑do lists, message boards, schedules, and file sharing. This keeps teams focused on actual work. Strong communication structure – Centralized message boards and comment threads cut down on scattered emails and make it easier to follow conversations over time. Transparency and accountability – Everyone can see what’s happening, who’s responsible for what, and what’s coming next, which supports collaboration and ownership. Minimal setup and maintenance – Projects can be created and managed quickly without complex configuration or customization. Overall, the biggest strength of Basecamp is how it reduces noise and complexity, making it especially effective for teams that value clear communication and straightforward project tracking over heavy customization or advanced workflows. > > **改善点**: What I liked least about Basecamp was that its simplicity can also feel limiting, especially for more complex or fast‑moving teams. In particular: Limited advanced features – Basecamp intentionally avoids things like custom workflows, detailed task dependencies, or advanced reporting, which can make it feel restrictive for larger or more structured projects. Not ideal for complex project tracking – There’s no native support for things like Gantt charts, workload planning, or time tracking, which some teams rely on for visibility and deadlines. Flat structure can feel rigid – Since all projects follow the same basic setup, it’s harder to adapt Basecamp to different project types or processes. Fewer automation options – Compared to other project management tools, automation and integrations are relatively minimal, which can mean more manual follow‑up. Scaling challenges – As the number of projects and conversations grows, it can become harder to manage or surface priorities quickly. Overall, what I liked least wasn’t a flaw so much as a trade‑off: Basecamp prioritizes simplicity over flexibility. That works well for straightforward collaboration but can feel limiting for teams that need more structure, customization, or advanced tracking tools. > > My overall experience with Basecamp was positive and refreshing, especially for teams that value clarity, communication, and simplicity over complex project management frameworks. Basecamp excelled at keeping work organized and easy to follow. Its clean interface and straightforward structure made it easy for everyone on the team to understand where discussions were happening, what tasks were assigned, and what deadlines were coming up—without needing formal training or ongoing system management. Communication felt more intentional and less fragmented thanks to centralized message boards and discussion threads, which significantly reduced email back‑and‑forth. The platform encouraged a calmer, more focused way of working. By limiting features to the essentials, Basecamp helped prevent over‑planning and micromanagement. For smaller teams or projects with well‑defined goals, this approach supported collaboration and accountability without adding unnecessary overhead. However, the experience became less ideal as project complexity increased. The lack of advanced task dependencies, customization, reporting, or automation meant that more structured teams or deadline‑driven projects sometimes needed workarounds or supplementary tools. In those cases, Basecamp felt more suited to coordination and communication than detailed project tracking. Overall, I found Basecamp to be a strong collaboration tool that works best for teams seeking simplicity, transparency, and reduced noise. While it’s not built for highly complex project management, it delivers a smooth, user‑friendly experience that supports effective teamwork and clear communication. ----- ### "Basecamp 5 is a perfect failure" — 2.0/5 > **Drew** | *2026年6月1日* | コンピュータ・ソフトウェア | おすすめ評価：2.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Basecamp has been a reliable project management and client collaboration platform since the classic version, delivering consistent core functionality across message boards, to-dos, file storage, campfire chat, and schedules Flat rate Pro Unlimited pricing is genuinely competitive and predictable for teams with large numbers of client users Clients can be added to projects at no additional cost, making it cost-effective for agency and SaaS onboarding workflows The platform served as an effective personalized documentation and training center, with clients actively using every feature > > **改善点**: The Basecamp 5 migration has been the worst product update experience in years of use dating back to Basecamp Classic Dozens of process-breaking workflow changes shipped with no opt-out or legacy mode Admin control over participant notification settings was removed; users must now manage their own notification preferences per project individually, destroying any ability to manage this at scale across hundreds of projects Project list access, archived items, templates, lineup, and other frequently used features were buried behind search bars and nested menus with no direct navigation Support response to every reported issue has been a consistent "sorry, that's the way it is now," with no acknowledgment that the changes broke real workflows > > The Basecamp 5 update has been the worst update migration experience and I've been a user since Basecamp classic. The number of process breaking changes are so long, we stopped tracking them. Basecamp's response, across the board, to each support request has been "sorry, that's the way it is now." ----- ### "Not the most user-friendly app" — 3.0/5 > **Caitie** | *2026年3月27日* | 健康、ウェルネス、フィットネス | おすすめ評価：6.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I didn't find basecamp to be very user friendly, the interface is a bit scattered and confusing, and I didn't like the way it was organized. > > **改善点**: The interface, the difficulty of finding where things were, and the constant confusion when trying to navigate within the app. > > I wasn't impressed with basecamp overall. As mentioned I had a tough time finding where things were and staying organized in the app. ----- ### "The simple project management system a hectic billing team can at least stick with." — 4.0/5 > **Frank** | *2026年4月26日* | 高級品、ジュエリー | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: All my team will need to work with is in one location and no one will need a tutorial to locate it. Such simplicity is actually worth something when individuals are working on things and not on learning software. > > **改善点**: Experienced two annoying bugs when sharing files with the team, where the attachments could not load. A glitch like that is difficult to ignore in a billing environment where accuracy of documents is a concern. > > Basecamp has introduced a serene organization to our project organization process at Kilarys. The calendar enables the financial deadlines to be visible and the flat pricing reduced the internal budget dialogue to a very short one. ----- ページ：1 / 578\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/56808/basecamp?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/56808/basecamp) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## 構造化データ