--- description: Codaを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Codaとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [製品管理システム](/directory/30865/product-management/software) > [Coda](/software/193164/coda) # Coda Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/193164/coda ページ：1 / 5\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/193164/coda?page=2) > Codaは、言葉、データ、チームをつなげる新しいドキュメントです。 > > 評価：98人のユーザーによる評価は**4.6/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Codaの対象ユーザー Codaはチームのためのドキュメントです。Spotify、Square、Uberといった企業は、会議の実施からグローバル展開の追跡まで、あらゆることにCodaドキュメントを活用しています。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.6/5** | 98 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.5/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Superhuman - **ロケーション**: San Francisco, アメリカ ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $0.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料版が利用可能) (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アメリカ合衆国, イギリス, インド, オーストラリア, カナダ, ドイツ, ブラジル, メキシコ, 中国, 日本 ## 機能 - API - Sub-Task Management - Task Editing - アイデア管理 - アラート／通知 - アンケートおよびフィードバック - カレンダー管理 - ガントチャート、タイムラインビュー - コメント、メモ - コラボレーションツール - ステータス追跡 - スプリント計画 - タスク・スケジューリング - タスク管理 - タスク進捗追跡 - テンプレート - ドキュメント管理 - ドラッグ・アンド・ドロップ - ファイル共有 - プレゼンテーション・ツール - プロジェクト計画 - プロジェクト計画／スケジューリング - プロジェクト追跡 - ポートフォリオ管理 - マイルストーン追跡 - メモ管理 - モバイル・アクセス - リソース管理 - リリース計画 - ワークフロー管理 - 予算運用 - 優先順位付け - 報告、プロジェクト追跡 - 時間・支出追跡 - 時間追跡 - 製品ロードマッピング - 課題管理 ## 統合 (合計16件) - Dropbox Business - GitHub - Gmail - Google Calendar - Google Contacts - Google Drive - Greenhouse - Instagram - Intercom - Jira - Lever - Phabricator - Shopify - Slack - Twilio ... さらに1件の統合 ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - チャット対応有 ## Category - [製品管理システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30865/product-management/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [製品管理システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30865/product-management/software) - [生産性向上ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30968/productivity/software) - [タスク管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [グループウェア](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [プロジェクト管理ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30002/project-management/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Google Workspace](https://www.capterra.jp/software/168389/google-workspace) — 4.7/5 (17519 reviews) 2. [Slack](https://www.capterra.jp/software/135003/slack) — 4.7/5 (24071 reviews) 3. [Asana](https://www.capterra.jp/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13555 reviews) 4. [Trello](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23506 reviews) 5. [Basecamp](https://www.capterra.jp/software/56808/basecamp) — 4.3/5 (14408 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Good now, only getting better" — 5.0/5 > **Stan** | *2020年7月17日* | 教育管理 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Other than Slack and e-mail, Coda is the main infratstructure for our organization. The flexibility and being able to set everything up and automate exactly to our liking is fantastic > > **改善点**: It's a fairly new product, which means that there's (almost) constantly UI changes going on. Performance could be better too, and interdoc connection is missing. > > I've been using Coda since the closed beta, and I've been blown away by their vision for the future and the speed with which they're implementing new functions. ----- ### "Comprehensive knowledge sharing and project management software" — 5.0/5 > **Isabella** | *2025年5月5日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Coda is a very comprehensive tool with many features that can be directly customized. I primarily use it as a company-wide "notebook", where different teammates have specific permissions to edit or view various pages. We also use it for very comprehensive project management - we even integrated an ability to take meeting notes via "forms". Our project manager can configure project management very specifically to meet each team's needs and requests. > > **改善点**: Some technical acumen and Coda-specific training is required to make the most of Coda features. We have a project manager who is responsible for administering Coda; the software requires an administrator to get the most out of the platform. > > Great tool for knowledge sharing and project management ----- ### "Good product, has potential but difficult to use" — 3.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2025年8月20日* | 病院、ヘルスケア | おすすめ評価：6.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I like how much you can do on Coda - we use it for quite a lot of things within our company. Its intuitive and a good product. > > **改善点**: Very difficult to use - not so user friendly. It has great capabilities but knowing how to use them can be tricky. Some clunkiness as well in terms of building tables, creating cross-docs etc - quite admin heavy. Also can't get any automations to work. > > It's a good product, needs some improving to make it easier to use. If you're not an IT person can get complicated with trying to use formulas to automate etc. ----- ### "Stellar and perfectly adaptable database system" — 5.0/5 > **認証済みレビュアー** | *2023年11月3日* | インターネット | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The flexibility of both setting up and using Coda is by far the best of any similar service I have tried. Whatever your needs are for a database-type service Coda will tick most, if not all boxes. Build the database exactly to your liking and expand when needed. The team also constantly works on implementing improvements based on user feedback. They also keep developing new features. > > **改善点**: They do not offer a lot of options when it comes to formatting and visual layouts. For example, you are bound to only two fonts: one serif and one sans-serif. Granted, you can play around with italics and bold types but you are pretty limited in your choices, at least for now. > > I usually try to find free online tools as much as possible. With Coda, I decided early on that this is something I am willing to pay for. And, since I do not need to pay for each user that has access to my databases, I only pay for the "Doc maker", the person(s) who builds the database, I found it a very reasonably priced option for my use. ----- ### "The future of docs and collaboration" — 5.0/5 > **Marie** | *2020年7月29日* | ベンチャーキャピタル、プライベートエクイティ | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Why I \*love\* Coda - First and foremost: tables and a writing surface in one doc. Never again do I have to link to a spreadsheet or paste long-form text into table so that all of my Google Suite info is cobbled into one doc. - Spans personal and professional work. I have transferred most of my professional work into Coda docs and (even more excitingly) moved all of my "life admin" work (moving checklists, auto repair history, wedding planning, etc) into Coda docs. Coda's flexible platform allows you to build docs that suit whatever work you're trying to accomplish. - Automations. In Coda you can set data and time-based triggers to alert you in email and Slack. These are game-changers when it comes to remembering an upcoming deadline, reminding a co-worker of an outstanding action item, or celebrating a data milestone. - Doc Gallery. The gallery is a collection of published docs that can be copied for your own use or be used for inspiration for creating new docs. If I'm ever stuck on how to make a doc (like distributed onboarding), I browse docs that other Coda creators have published for ideas on layouts, formatting, and formulas. > > **改善点**: Challenges in using Coda - Onboarding. The power of Coda can be intimidating when onboarding – I would second-guess whether doc layouts were as good as they could possibly be, if my formulas were robust, if I should make a different sub-page or section for content, etc. Thankfully, Coda has a variety of resources like their Community of creators, the Help Center, a YouTube channel (shout out to \[SENSITIVE CONTENT HIDDEN\]\!), and a fantastic support team. It took a couple weeks of watching videos and reading the Community page while transferring docs to Coda for me to feel like I really understood the platform, but now I feel like I really \*get\* all of the features and feel empowered when making docs. - Onboarding your team. Getting a team to adopt a new tool, especially something as foundational as docs/collaboration/documentation is hard. We had the full spectrum of people who were elated about using Coda to... not elated. I wanted to give everyone the experience of using a fully built out doc, so we transferred our weekly team meeting gdoc into Coda. In doing this everyone had a direct comparison between old (gdocs) and new (Coda docs), and we won over most people just with that doc. To keep up the momentum, I worked with teams and individuals to transfer over their docs to Coda, and I send out an email every week sharing a Coda feature (like emailing pages, automations, conditional formatting). Coda is the new default for our team after ~1-2 months of transition. > > My experience with Coda has been exceptional. I feel empowered by their resources to create exciting docs that have transformed our workflows, and if I ever have questions I know that Coda Support or the Coda Community will be able to help. ----- ページ：1 / 5\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/193164/coda?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/193164/coda) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | sv | | ----- ## 構造化データ