キャプテラ - 日本企業の最適な
ソフトウェア選びをサポートし17年

Diligent Equityとは

EquityEffectは、民間企業が株式を管理するための使いやすいプラットフォームです。オプション管理、資本政策表、実行シナリオを簡単に管理することができます。

Diligent Equityの製品詳細

良いポイント:

Could have some nice features like waterfall if data was reliable.

改善してほしい点:

Data inputted by their team is often wrong, software is buggy, and lots of key features (like companies that have shuttered being reflected as zero) are not yet implemented.

Diligent Equityの評価

評価ポイント

使いやすさ
3.8
カスタマーサービス
4.3
機能
3.4
価格の妥当性
4.2

おすすめ度

6.9/10

Diligent Equityの総合評価は3.7/5です。 (キャプテラに寄せられた12件のレビューより集計)。

Diligent Equityを使用したことがありますか?

あなたのレビューを投稿しませんか?

レビューを絞り込む (12件)

Michael
Michael
アメリカのOffice Coordinator
認証済みLinkedInユーザー
バイオテクノロジー, 5,001~10,000人規模の会社
使用期間: 6~12か月
投稿経路
ソース:GetApp

No matter what Industry you are in, one can't go wrong with this software...

4.0 3 年前

良いポイント:

It took me only less than 2 days when it came to mastering the software and being confident on how to use it.

改善してほしい点:

the software has so many features that when you first see it, it can't be a little overwhelming the first 3 times you use it.

Nick
アメリカのController
ベンチャーキャピタル、プライベートエクイティ, 11~50人規模の会社
使用期間: 6~12か月
投稿経路

YE Review

4.0 4 年前

良いポイント:

I like the API Plug in the availability of the info.

改善してほしい点:

Would like there to be more customizable features for the tear sheets to be able to drag and drop information onto the page however we would like. Also, for post money valuations, would like the ability to update on our own if there is a disconnect as it's based on Pre-Money and doesn't always agree to our records.

Anat
イスラエルのRevenue Assistant Controller
情報技術、情報サービス, 501~1,000人規模の会社
使用期間: 6~12か月
投稿経路

Software is not reliable enough

2.0 5 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: On a daily basis, I use the software mainly to check options status of the company's employees. I perform exercises and cancellation of options. Also, I manage the company's cap table and all other relevant equity updates (pool increasing, warrants updates etc.).

良いポイント:

Easy to understand how to use. Menu is simple.

改善してほしい点:

In my opinion, the software is not reliable. I don't trust it to save my data in proper way. I usually do double checking when performing actions.

Genevieve
アメリカのGP
ベンチャーキャピタル、プライベートエクイティ, 2~10人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Refreshing and functional!

5.0 4 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: The team at Equity Effect is great to work with! They are super responsive, helpful and patient. Great team and great customer service!

良いポイント:

We really like the capabilities for managing cap tables and modeling scenarios. It is easy to use and has sophisticated functionality.

改善してほしい点:

So far, there is not anything I do not like.

Patrick
アメリカのAssociate
ベンチャーキャピタル、プライベートエクイティ, 2~10人規模の会社
使用期間: 6~12か月
投稿経路

Becoming an Integral Part of Our Operations

5.0 4 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: The EquityEffect team has been incredibly responsive and helpful.

良いポイント:

EquityEffect has made it easier to aggregate our fund information, investment documents, and other pertinent materials in a centralized location that is accessible to both our team and our investors. The system provides nice visualization tools and other features that aide in our reporting and portfolio management.

改善してほしい点:

The software is missing a few key features that would enable us to upload without having to go to the Diligent portal, easily update investments on the platform , etc. All in all, it seems the system is still being iterated upon but will eventually reach a point where it provides a seamless interface for VC fund management.

Sergey
イスラエルのController
コンピュータ・ソフトウェア, 501~1,000人規模の会社
使用期間: 2年以上
投稿経路

Zerto

3.0 5 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: Recommended for use by small-medium enterprises with a lot of controls in place to constantly verify the data.

良いポイント:

Helps with the daily large database management.

改善してほしい点:

1) Not reliable - sometimes the saved changes are lost. 2) Upon some updates, the data may be altered. 3) No flexible reporting functionality - build-in reports vs having a flexible reports building tool.

認証済みレビュアー
認証済みLinkedInユーザー
ベンチャーキャピタル、プライベートエクイティ, 2~10人規模の会社
使用期間: 6~12か月
投稿経路
ソース:GetApp

Complicated and unreliable

1.0 4 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: This software has increased the time required to manage the cap table by 10X compared to a spreadsheet

良いポイント:

Could have some nice features like waterfall if data was reliable

改善してほしい点:

Complicated to navigate and fix errors Slow customer service in updating cap tables Data entry unreliable and data spontaneously changes

認証済みレビュアー
認証済みLinkedInユーザー
金融サービス, 2~10人規模の会社
使用期間: 6~12か月
投稿経路

Finally a platform for VC's that actually helps....

5.0 5 年前

良いポイント:

Easy to use, great customer service, does a lot

改善してほしい点:

Looking forward to new features being added -- e.g., more portfolio KPIs

Gil
イスラエルのGC
コンピュータ・ソフトウェア, 201~500人規模の会社
使用期間: 1年以上
投稿経路

my review of EquityEffect

4.0 5 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: generally satisfied, the software delivers but there is definitely room for improvement.

良いポイント:

Friendlier than similar software, ticks all boxes for my purposes

改善してほしい点:

often you run into bugs both in the UI/UX and in the core capabilities.

Erez
イスラエルのController
コンピュータ・ネットワーク, 51~200人規模の会社
使用期間: 6~12か月
投稿経路

ES review

5.0 5 年前

良いポイント:

What did you like most about this software: user-friendly interface

改善してほしい点:

no forget password mechanism some features required to reverse other data so it will be affected

Ben
アメリカのFinance Senior Manager
ベンチャーキャピタル、プライベートエクイティ, 51~200人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Great solution for fund construction

5.0 4 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: Overall great. The onboarding team was very detailed with building our environment and we have enjoyed working with the team. They have been very responsive to answering questions, too.

良いポイント:

I really enjoy that it gives you a one-stop shop for evaluating future financing rounds (via the scenarios tool)

改善してほしい点:

A bit trickier to handle international (non-USD) cap tables

Sam
アメリカのHead of Ops
金融サービス, 2~10人規模の会社
使用期間: 1~5か月
投稿経路

Don't buy EquityEffect

1.0 5 年前

良いポイント:

They seem to have a general sense of their product strategy, roadmap, and useful features

改善してほしい点:

Data inputted by their team is often wrong, software is buggy, and lots of key features (like companies that have shuttered being reflected as zero) are not yet implemented. Save yourself the time and frustration and wait until their product is usable.