--- description: Fusion Framework Systemを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Fusion Framework Systemとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [リスクマネジメントシステム](/directory/30665/risk-management/software) > [Fusion Framework System](/software/150583/fusion) # Fusion Framework System Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/150583/fusion ページ：1 / 3\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/150583/fusion?page=2) > Fusion Framework Systemでは、1つのプラットフォームでリスクと回復力を管理することができます。 > > 評価：51人のユーザーによる評価は**4.5/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Fusion Framework Systemの対象ユーザー ビジネスがどのように機能し、破壊し、回復するのかを理解したいと考えている組織。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.5/5** | 51 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.2/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.1/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 90% | (9/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Fusion Risk Management - **ロケーション**: Rolling Meadows, アメリカ - **設立**: 2006 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格モデル**: (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ）, Linux（デスクトップ）, Chromebook（デスクトップ）, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: アイルランド語, アラビア語, イタリア語, オランダ語, スウェーデン語, スペイン語, タイ語, デンマーク語, ドイツ語, ノルウェー語, フランス語, ポルトガル語, ロシア語, 中国語, 日本語, 繁体中国語, 英語, 韓国語 - **利用可能な国**: アイルランド, アメリカ合衆国, イギリス, オランダ, オーストリア, カナダ, スイス, スウェーデン, デンマーク, ドイツ, ノルウェー, フランス, ブラジル, ベルギー, メキシコ, ルクセンブルク, 中国, 日本 ## 機能 - ITリスク・マネジメント - Real-Time Reporting - Risk Analysis - アクセス制御・許可 - アラート／通知 - インシデント・レポート - インシデント管理 - オフボーディング - オペレーショナル・リスク管理 - オンボーディング - コンプライアンス管理 - ステータス追跡 - セキュア・データストレージ - セルフサービスポータル - タスク管理 - ダッシュボード - データの可視化 - ドキュメント管理 - パフォーマンス測定基準 - プロジェクト管理 - ベンダー管理 - モバイル・アクセス - リスクアラート - リスク・マネジメント - リスク評価 - リスク評価 - ワークフロー管理 - 内部統制管理 - 契約・ライセンス管理 - 応答管理 - 承認プロセス管理 - 災害復興 - 監査管理 - 監査証跡 - 設定可能ワークフロー - 評価管理 - 調査管理 - 通信管理 ## 統合 (合計11件) - AlertMedia - Argos Risk - Boomi - Everbridge Mass Notification - MuleSoft Anypoint Platform - OnSolve Platform - Salesforce Sales Cloud - SecurityScorecard - ServiceNow - Supply Wisdom - xMatters ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート - チャット対応有 ## Category - [リスクマネジメントシステム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30665/risk-management/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [リスクマネジメントシステム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30665/risk-management/software) - [ERM](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/32559/erm/software) - [BCP作成支援ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30206/business-continuity/software) - [ベンダー管理システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10024/vendor-management/software) - [統合リスク管理ソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31545/integrated-risk-management/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.jp/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2887 reviews) 2. [MasterControl Quality Excellence](https://www.capterra.jp/software/148577/mastercontrol) — 4.5/5 (526 reviews) 3. [GOAT Risk](https://www.capterra.jp/software/205001/goat-risk) — 4.7/5 (65 reviews) 4. [Resolver](https://www.capterra.jp/software/147599/resolver) — 4.4/5 (79 reviews) 5. [Onspring](https://www.capterra.jp/software/138931/audit-software) — 4.8/5 (105 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Strong Business Continuity and Resilience Platform" — 5.0/5 > **Greg** | *2024年5月22日* | 食品、飲料 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The Fusion platform has helped us build our continuity plans, categorize our risks, and incidents across our organization. Fusion is very easy to use, update, and everything connects together easily. The platform is very reliable and stable. In addition, Fusion has been thoughtful with integrations, such as with AlertMedia and Security Scorecard, which allows you to bring in additional data for context and awareness. > > **改善点**: Because the platform is built on Salesforce, which is pretty easy to use, you're limited to what Salesforce can (or cannot) do - such as enhancements or specific customizations. Also, with Salesforce, additional seat licenses can be expensive. > > We have been partners with Fusion since 2017 and have used the product quite extensively. They are a passionate organization that wants to see their clients be successful and resilient. They have been great to work with. ----- ### "Fusion Framework System, by Ed Brown" — 5.0/5 > **Ed** | *2020年1月31日* | 保険 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: I love the simplicity as an administrator to make changes, within my knowledge limits and the use of Fuel Hours to supplement my knowledge gaps. There were very view, but some, implementation problems. Fusion listens to their clients and has since improved their implementation process. I presented a complex model to determine the process RTO based 9 impact categories over time. They delivered what I wanted. Of course, I think, everyone client would want this model and it should be a separate object because it did eat up a lot of our available custom fields in the process object. We are working with Fusion to pull that part out and create a new object or leverage a lesser used object. I really like the incident management object. > > **改善点**: I think there should have been standard dashboarding out of the box. All clients implement a program with a BCP life cycle and dashboard are used to help user and program managers manage compliance to the annual deliverables. Instead these were created with fuel hours. (scale 1-10, 1 being not a big deal to 10 being horrible - this is a 2.) I am also accustom to having a BIA (Process) review with a maintenance control and we used fuel hours to enhance this for a BIA approval section. I think that should be standard. (scale 1-10, 1 being not a big deal to 10 being horrible - this is a 4.) Lastly plan conga generator and its templates are not well designed and we have had several changes requested to make them design the way we want them. Fusion could spend more time on the conga templates clients may like. (scale 1-10, 1 being not a big deal to 10 being horrible - this is a 7.) All these cons are correctable and have been and which is why I added the first PRO above. > > Improved crisis management and communication during events. We call these response plans which are activated based on the level of the event and are a prelude to a recovery plan activation. ----- ### "Expensive product with lots of hidden caveats." — 3.0/5 > **Kevin** | *2022年10月16日* | 銀行 | おすすめ評価：2.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: It is not vaporware and does cover a wide area on a number of BC, DR, QA, EM, Risk, etc areas. > > **改善点**: Limited by Salesforce platform and decisions. Can't run large reports. Have to export to run deep analytics. No real tools to measure performance of system or determine what the issues are. No Archiving built in. Audits require evidence within a audit window period "typically" in the past. Reporting ability with Conga is outdated. Even the new Adv Reporting should be called Adv Dashboarding. Executives DO NOT want to login to see those pretty pictures. Need a supported interface to PowerBI. SOQL is NOT SQL. Joins limited to 3 levels. Every SQL tool I have used to solve problems in the past is basically NOT allowed in SOQL. Lacking Audit tools to even use Shield product. Lack of advanced training specific for the tool. Need a 3rd party blog site to track and discuss issues that will NEVER be discussed or even allowed in the ENGAGE meetings. Limitations on refreshes, limitation on space for data, and the absolute need to engage with additional 3rd parties and tools for Deployments and backup and recovery. It is embarrassing that a Risk (BC/DR) tool does not even have "self coverage" of BC/DR within an RTO/RPO or MTO that would pass an audit much less a real event. > > If you go with base package, then load your data and go from there, you will have a better chance of success. Like all software packages, the Devil is in the details. If you want a bespoke solution then do not buy a package that limits your ability to customize it to the UI or the limitations of ANOTHER 3rd party (Salesforce) which is an independent company that creates issues on "who" to even talk to. ----- ### "Fabulous Fusion Framework" — 5.0/5 > **Vicky** | *2020年2月3日* | 通信 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: That it is so flexible and configurable. We have very specific requirements based on our risk models and this platform allows us to meet every single one. > > **改善点**: The classic version is dated, but moving to the Lightening is improving our end user experience. It is also somewhat difficult to learn some of the concepts of relational data, how they integrate and are maximized for those who don't have a background in software back ends. Having said that, I'm not a developer and can do most of my own configurations. > > It took us time to set up and integrate all of our data, but just plan development for all but one of the 40 teams, went from estimated 3-5 days, down to 1 day. That is BIA data collection in the AM and BCP in the PM. We had basic plans with requirements done in 1 day\! This saved us 10K hours of team time during the first year. We have been thrilled with the automation both on the planning side and on the Risk Management side. ----- ### "Fusion Framework System" — 5.0/5 > **Brian** | *2020年2月6日* | 健康、ウェルネス、フィットネス | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Plan configuration and management, Incident management, Processes, Library Procedure Group options, Dashboard for reports, Application and Component records. We were looking to replace our old LDRPS and this was clearly a better tool. > > **改善点**: The inability to remove/delete user accounts. > > The tool works well for our BC and IT plan management. We have taken the next step to use the tool for our disaster recovery exercise monitoring. We are monitoring our exercises and proof of concepts manually and we will eventually implement the Service now connection that will allow us to track, monitor and delegate tasks once an incident is triggered and the plans are executed. We are looking to use the tool too its full capability. ----- ページ：1 / 3\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/150583/fusion?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/150583/fusion) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## 構造化データ