--- description: Boxを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Boxとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [デジタルサイネージソフト](/directory/10055/digital-signage/software) > [Box](/software/148766/box) # Box Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/148766/box ページ：1 / 227\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/148766/box?page=2) > Boxを使用することで、チームは、コンテンツのライフサイクル全体をサポートするためにつくられた、セキュアな単一コラボレーション・プラットフォームで、どこからでも作業することが可能になります。 > > 評価：5642人のユーザーによる評価は**4.4/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### Boxの対象ユーザー Boxは、中小企業からグローバル企業まで、あらゆる業界とビジネス・サイズ向けのワークプレイス・ソリューションです。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.4/5** | 5642 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.5/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 4.3/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 4.4/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 80% | (8/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: Box - **設立**: 2005 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **価格プラン**: $20.00 - **価格モデル**: (無料のトライアル) - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Mac（デスクトップ）, Windows（デスクトップ）, Android（モバイル）, iPhone（モバイル）, iPad（モバイル） - **サポートされる言語**: イタリア語, オランダ語, スウェーデン語, スペイン語, デンマーク語, トルコ語, ドイツ語, ヒンディー語, フィンランド語, フランス語, ポルトガル語, ポーランド語, ロシア語, 中国語, 日本語, 繁体中国語, 英語, 韓国語 - **利用可能な国**: アメリカ合衆国, イギリス, インド, オーストラリア, カナダ, ドイツ, 中国, 日本 ## 機能 - @メンション - Real-Time Monitoring - Subcontractor Monitoring - Task Editing - アクセス制御・許可 - アクティビティの追跡 - アクティビティ・ダッシュボード - コメント、メモ - コラボレーションツール - コンテンツライブラリ - コンテンツ公開オプション - コンテンツ管理 - ステータス追跡 - セキュア・データストレージ - セキュア・ファイルビューア - タグ付け - タスク管理 - テキスト編集 - テンプレートのカスタマイズ - テンプレート管理 - データのインポート／エクスポート - データストレージ管理 - データセキュリティ - データ同期 - ドキュメント・キャプチャ - ドキュメント・ストレージ - ドキュメント分類 - ドキュメント管理 - ドラッグ・アンド・ドロップ - バックアップ、修復 - ファイル転送 - フルテキスト検索 - ブランディングのカスタマイズ - プロジェクト追跡 - ミーティング管理 - メタデータ管理 - メッセージング - モバイル・アクセス - リアルタイム同期 - リモートアクセス／コントロール - リモートサポート - 優先順位付け - 割り当て管理 - 原価見積もり - 暗号化 - 監査証跡 - 納期管理 - 認証 - 資産分類 - 電子署名 ... さらに18件の機能 ## 統合 (合計74件) - Adobe Workfront - Airtable - AppOmni - AppSheet - Asana - Benchling - Bluebeam Revu - CI HUB Connector - ChatGPT - Claris Connect - Claude - CloudSign（クラウドサイン） - Darktrace - Device Magic - Docusign ... さらに59件の統合 ## サポートのオプション - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [デジタルサイネージソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10055/digital-signage/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [デジタルサイネージソフト](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10055/digital-signage/software) - [文書管理システム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30063/document-management/software) - [グループウェア](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [CMS（コンテンツ管理システム）](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/10007/content-management/software) - [DAM（デジタルアセットマネジメント）](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30203/digital-asset-management/software) ## 代替製品 1. [Google Drive](https://www.capterra.jp/software/161425/drive) — 4.8/5 (28592 reviews) 2. [Google Workspace](https://www.capterra.jp/software/168389/google-workspace) — 4.7/5 (17672 reviews) 3. [OneDrive](https://www.capterra.jp/software/161304/onedrive) — 4.5/5 (12833 reviews) 4. [Microsoft 365](https://www.capterra.jp/software/58688/microsoft-365) — 4.6/5 (14144 reviews) 5. [Microsoft SharePoint](https://www.capterra.jp/software/1167/sharepoint) — 4.4/5 (5460 reviews) ## レビュー ### "Handy instrument for content collaboration" — 4.0/5 > **Maria** | *2026年4月22日* | 薬品 | おすすめ評価：8.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: It is easy to collaborate on documents. I can leave comments or propose changes in the text - it is very handy for articles and other documents, because we have a lot of people involved in the content creation and coordination. > > **改善点**: The interface might be confusing for less technically sophisticated people. I had to create a video tutorial on commenting because some colleagues couldn't figure out how to open the document and leave their notes. > > As an editor, I work with articles from multiple authors and collaborate in a box with authors, medical reviewers, and other stakeholders. We collect all the comments for materials and work on them together before we reach an agreement, and the document is accepted. Box helps keep all the history of comments and changes, and it also helps avoid the situation where someone has the wrong or outdated version of the article for review. ----- ### "Excellent sharing tool" — 4.0/5 > **Chris** | *2025年7月10日* | 教育管理 | おすすめ評価：9.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: BOX has good sharing, integrates with MS Office tools. Easy to arrange storage and cascading permissions make it easy to safely and appropriately share with staff. Does require some forethought for setting folders and share cascade. > > **改善点**: Can be glitchy and requires consistent updating to continue integration with MS Outlook tools. I don't like that won't remember the previous actions, saving to or whether or not I want to create a box. Sharing experience is good, but not totally native in the same way that Google Drive works. Hard sell on people who are committed to google environment > > I was not a fully committed google drive user, so I was not resistant to start. I love that it integrates with MS Office (which google does not) so it is native to the work environment. Sharing is solid, and this is important. ----- ### "Very good file storage & collaboration platform" — 5.0/5 > **David** | *2026年4月17日* | コンピュータ・ソフトウェア | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The ability to send an "upload" only link to someone is a great feature when working with external people. It allows them to upload their files without being able to view or access the original folder or see what other people may have uploaded. The folder structuring is pretty standard compared to other platforms but Box does a really good job with granular collaboration permissions from the parent folder and down. Configuring organization wide settings is easy to setup as well. UI is modern, clean, and easy to navigate. > > **改善点**: Box is a little on the pricier side when compared to other platforms and some of the more advanced features are hidden behind an additional license/add-on. There is no native "team/shared folder" feature. If you need to create a team/shared folder, it has to be created within someone's individual account. You essentially need to start off with creating a service account user and then creating all your team/shared folders within that service account. > > Box overall is a very good file storage and collaboration platform. Web interface is easy to use and navigate and the desktop app syncs and works well within File Explorer or Finder. Its great when collaborating with external users because you can either give them access to a folder with granular permissions or you can generate a link for them to upload files to only. Reporting is good as well as you can report on all user and file/folder activity (for both internal and external users). It can be on the pricier side especially if you want some of the more advanced features such as a Shield or Goverance or Retention Policies. ----- ### "Stay away from these crooks" — 1.0/5 > **Anne** | *2025年7月25日* | 金融サービス | おすすめ評価：0.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: It works well as long as you don't have a security breach and need support. If you try contacting them, they are resistant and angry, which on top of ignorance is hard to take. > > **改善点**: TERRIBLE customer service. Huge overcharges that they refuse to even acknowledge much less credit back. NEVER give this company a credit card. > > I tried to reduce the number of seats we are charged for with their online tool and they charged for double the number of seats. After a week, the only response to multiple inquiries is "You have to call on the phone," but their site provides no phone number. But I'm not offended: they also refuse to respond to the credit card company and the Better Business Bureau. Either Box is terribly managed or they actually care more about a few thousand dollars than about their reputation as corporate pirates. This company has deteriorated in the last few years and now Dropbox is far better. ----- ### "Secure, Reliable Document Management Built for Enterprise" — 5.0/5 > **Radha** | *2026年4月23日* | 法律サービス | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: What I liked most about Box was its strong focus on secure, enterprise‑grade file storage and collaboration, combined with ease of use. In particular: Robust security and compliance – Box excels at protecting sensitive information with granular permission controls, encryption, and compliance features, making it especially well‑suited for organizations handling confidential documents. Easy, intuitive file sharing – Sharing files and folders—internally or externally—is simple and user‑friendly, with clear control over access levels and expiration settings. Strong collaboration features – Real‑time comments, version history, and file previews made collaboration straightforward without needing to download files. Excellent Microsoft integration – Seamless integration with tools like Microsoft 365 (Word, Excel, Outlook) made it easy to edit and collaborate on documents without leaving Box. Centralized document management – Box did a great job of keeping documents organized and accessible, reducing version confusion and scattered file storage. Overall, what stood out most was Box’s ability to balance security with usability. It felt reliable and professional while still being easy for users to collaborate efficiently—particularly valuable for teams or organizations with strict data protection requirements. > > **改善点**: What I liked least about Box was that, while it’s very strong on security and compliance, it can sometimes feel heavy and less flexible for everyday use. In particular: Interface can feel cluttered – With many enterprise features layered in, the user experience isn’t always as clean or intuitive as some lighter file‑sharing tools. Performance with large folders – Navigating or syncing folders with many large files could occasionally feel slow. Offline access limitations – Working with files offline wasn’t always as seamless, especially compared to native desktop file systems. Administrative complexity – Managing permissions, policies, and settings requires careful attention, which can be time‑consuming for administrators. Cost for advanced features – Pricing can add up, particularly when advanced security, collaboration, or compliance features are required. Overall, the main drawback was that Box sometimes felt overbuilt for simpler needs. It’s excellent for regulated or security‑focused environments, but for teams looking for speed and simplicity first, it can feel more complex than necessary. > > My overall experience with Box was reliable and professional, particularly in environments where security, compliance, and document control are priorities. Box performed very well as a centralized document management and collaboration platform. It provided strong confidence that files were stored securely, with clear version history, access controls, and auditability. Sharing documents—both internally and with external parties—was straightforward, and the ability to manage permissions at a granular level was especially valuable when working with sensitive or confidential information. Collaboration features such as file previews, comments, and real‑time editing worked smoothly and reduced the need to download documents or rely on multiple versions. Integration with Microsoft 365 was a notable strength, allowing documents to be edited and co‑authored efficiently while remaining within Box’s secure environment. That said, the experience sometimes felt heavy for everyday use. The interface can feel busy, especially for users who only need basic file storage and sharing. Performance occasionally slowed when working with large folders or many files, and offline access was less intuitive than native desktop file systems. From an administrative perspective, managing settings and permissions required careful oversight, which added complexity. Overall, I found Box to be a strong, enterprise‑grade solution that excels in security and governance. While it may feel overbuilt for simple file sharing needs, it delivers significant value for organizations that require structured document management, compliance, and controlled collaboration. ----- ページ：1 / 227\ 次へ: [次ページ](https://www.capterra.jp/software/148766/box?page=2) ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/148766/box) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## 構造化データ