--- description: CAQ.Netを実際に使用したユーザーのレビューから、製品の機能や価格、メリットデメリットをご覧いただけます。類似製品との比較も簡単、ぴったりのSaaSが見つかるはず！ image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: CAQ.Netとは？ | 機能や料金、導入事例をご紹介【キャプテラ】 --- 現在地表示: [ホーム](/) > [QMS（品質管理システム）](/directory/30099/quality-management/software) > [CAQ.Net](/software/127367/caq-compact-net) # CAQ.Net Canonical: https://www.capterra.jp/software/127367/caq-compact-net > すべての業界と企業規模に対応するモジュラー型の品質管理ソフトウェア・ソリューション。 > > 評価：5人のユーザーによる評価は**4.8/5**。**おすすめ度**で最高の評価。 ----- ## 概要 ### CAQ.Netの対象ユーザー 多種類の企業、品質管理 (QM) を行うあらゆる企業。 ## 簡単な統計と評価 | 測定基準 | 評価 | 詳細 | | **総合評価** | **4.8/5** | 5 レビュー | | 使いやすさ | 4.6/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | カスタマー・サポート | 4.8/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 価格の妥当性 | 5.0/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | 機能 | 5.0/5 | レビュー全体に基づく | | おすすめ率 | 100% | (10/10 おすすめ度) | ## 企業情報 - **キャプテラについて**: CAQ AG Factory Systems - **ロケーション**: Rheinboellen, ドイツ - **設立**: 1993 ## ビジネスコンテキスト - **対象となる企業**: 自営業, 2～10, 11～50, 51～200, 201～500, 501～1,000, 1,001～5,000, 5,001～10,000, 10,000+ - **デプロイとプラットフォーム**: クラウド、SaaS、ウェブベース, Windows（デスクトップ）, Windows（オンプレミス） - **サポートされる言語**: スペイン語, ドイツ語, フランス語, 英語 - **利用可能な国**: アイスランド, アイルランド, アメリカ合衆国, アラブ首長国連邦, アルバ, アルバニア, アンギラ, アンティグア・バーブーダ, アンドラ, イギリス, イタリア, インド, インドネシア, ウクライナ, エストニア, オランダ, オーストラリア, オーストリア, オーランド諸島, カナダ さらに68件 ## 機能 - アラート／通知 - インシデント管理 - クレーム管理 - コンプライアンス管理 - タスク管理 - ダッシュボード - トレーニング管理 - ドキュメントのコーディングおよび制御 - フォーム管理 - メンテナンス管理 - リスク・マネジメント - リスク評価 - レポートと統計 - 不適合追跡 - 品質管理 - 変更管理 - 是正措置・予防措置 (CAPA) - 根本原因解析 - 機器管理 - 点検管理 - 監査管理 - 監査計画 - 監査証跡 ## 統合 (合計22件) - APplus - Abacus - CSB-System - DeepL Pro - ELIAS - IFS Cloud - IFS Ultimo - Infor CRM - Infor CloudSuite - Isah ERP - Microsoft 365 - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Word - ORDAT.ERP - PSI ... さらに7件の統合 ## サポートのオプション - メール/ヘルプデスク - FAQ/フォーラム - ナレッジベース - 電話サポート - 24時間対応（オペレータ） - チャット対応有 ## Category - [QMS（品質管理システム）](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30099/quality-management/software) ## 関連カテゴリー - [QMS（品質管理システム）](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30099/quality-management/software) - [監査ツール](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/30664/audit/software) - [CAPAシステム](https://www.capterra.jp/directory/31343/corrective-and-preventive-action/software) ## 代替製品 1. [QT9 QMS](https://www.capterra.jp/software/97557/qt9-quality-management) — 4.8/5 (117 reviews) 2. [MasterControl Quality Excellence](https://www.capterra.jp/software/148577/mastercontrol) — 4.5/5 (526 reviews) 3. [Qualio](https://www.capterra.jp/software/134050/quality-management-software) — 4.6/5 (128 reviews) 4. [Dot Compliance](https://www.capterra.jp/software/192574/dot-compliance) — 4.4/5 (76 reviews) 5. [Ideagen Quality Management](https://www.capterra.jp/software/155354/Ideagen-Quality-Management) — 4.5/5 (178 reviews) ## レビュー ### "20 Years of Positive Experience with CAQ.Net" — 5.0/5 > **Maik** | *2026年3月3日* | 経営コンサルティング | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: What I liked most about CAQ.Net is its modular structure and fully integrated approach. The system is user-friendly and offers numerous interfaces to ERP and measurement systems, making it easy to integrate into existing IT environments. The Document Management module ensures structured workflows, clear version control, and strong audit readiness. In addition, the Compliance and Risk Management functionalities provide a systematic and transparent way to identify, assess, and monitor risks. Combined with its very good value for money, CAQ.Net delivers a powerful and well-rounded quality management solution. > > **改善点**: Honestly, I can't say anything negative about the software. The support team is extremely competent, and response times are fast and reliable. If I had to suggest one improvement, it would be the form creation, which could be made a bit more user-friendly. But that's really nitpicking. > > I have been working with CAQ.Net for over 20 years in various consulting and implementation projects. During this time, I have seen the software continuously evolve and adapt to new requirements. From my perspective, the modular and fully integrated structure is a major strength, as it creates transparency and ensures consistent data across all quality processes. The Document Management and Compliance \& Risk Management modules particularly stand out, supporting structured workflows, audit readiness, and proactive risk control. Overall, CAQ.Net offers excellent functionality combined with very good value for money, and my long-term experience with the system has been consistently positive. ----- ### "Excellent Management Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Armand** | *2017年1月6日* > > We are using CAQ AG software since 1994. All pc\`s are equipped with CAQ as central quality assurance system. Benefits: All important data stored at one SQL server. Transparent overview of data and processes. Online-Monitoring of all management system relevant processes. Unique system of monitoring of actions and due dates. Access to data from ERP and other databases. Positive Feedback from customers, suppliers and certification bodies. ----- ### "CAQ QEN Partner-Review" — 4.0/5 > **Mario** | *2026年1月26日* | 情報技術、情報サービス | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: The consistency between the individual modules enables effective, transparent and holistic quality management. > > **改善点**: As it is a standard product, there are better tools available for individual specialist areas (e.g. FMEA-Tool, Process Management-Tool). > > The software covers a wide range of requirements across various industries and now also has a very user-friendly interface. ----- ### "Flexible CAQ system with strong support and high automation potential" — 5.0/5 > **Christian** | *2026年4月1日* | 自動車 | おすすめ評価：10.0/10 > > **良いポイント**: Very flexible system that can be configured without programming skills. Strong and reliable support that helps implement workflows. Once you understand the logic, it can be applied across multiple modules like complaints, inspection planning, and maintenance. Powerful automation features such as escalation workflows and email notifications significantly improve process control. Excellent for standardization, data quality, and KPI tracking. > > **改善点**: Initial setup and structuring require time and a clear concept. Without defined standards (e.g. error catalogs), the system can become complex. Administrative know-how is needed to fully leverage the system’s potential. Nowadays with AI strategy Planing for failure glossars or Standard data bases not really a big Deal. My proposal on the beginning would be to call the Support, when you have any questions. They will help you immidiatly. > > I have been working with a CAQ system for about 12 years initially as a user in complaint management and initial sampling, and later also in administration. Even as a user, the system offered everything needed for day to day operations. Its high flexibility is particularly impressive: many functions can be customized without requiring programming knowledge. Especially in the early years, when we didn’t have a dedicated administrator, I was able to implement changes easily with the help of support. The support team was always easy to reach and solutions oriented. As my experience grew, I was able to delve deeper into system administration and map out complex processes. One example is a three-tier escalation process for overdue complaints: automatic notification of the employee, followed by the team leader, and finally the department head each triggered by a timer via email. This has significantly contributed to making our processes more stable and transparent. By introducing clearly defined error glossaries, structured error groups, and locked master data, we were able to significantly improve data quality. Combined with stored text modules and libraries, the system became a true productivity tool: standardized customer communication was possible with just a few clicks, without any manual text entry. Once you understand this logic within the system, it can be easily applied to other modules. Whether it’s inspection planning or maintenance management: the same principles apply here as well. Automatic notification chains for overdue maintenance, clearly structured maintenance plans, and defined error scenarios can be efficiently established and scaled. A major advantage today is the support provided by AI: whereas in the past a great deal of time had to be invested in structuring fault catalogs, today it is possible to establish a solid foundation and a well-thought-out system logic much more quickly. Overall, the CAQ system thus becomes a true control tool. Key metrics such as complaint processing times can be transparently evaluated and specifically improved. This allows concrete goals such as a complete 8D report within 30 days to be systematically tracked and achieved. At the same time, audit compliance and process quality increase significantly. Advantages: High flexibility without programming knowledge Excellent support Scalable to various modules (complaints, inspection planning, maintenance) Powerful automation and escalation logic Efficient key performance indicator tracking and analysis Significant increase in efficiency through standardization Disadvantages: Getting up to speed with administration takes time Without a clear structure, the system can quickly become complex. With AI as a Consulting for you special Company structure it makes it much easier ----- ### "Great product for Quality Management" — 5.0/5 > **Florian** | *2016年5月10日* > > Thsi is a great prosuct to mange our quality management system. Our QM-System is based on the ISO 9001:2015. ## リンク - [Capterraで表示する](https://www.capterra.jp/software/127367/caq-compact-net) ## このページは以下の言語で利用できます | ロケール | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## 構造化データ